On 2/27/2014 10:31 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:45:29 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 9:39 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:57:26 AM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 8:55 AM, Tim wrote:


Pardon me. Allow me to repeat myself-



"Doesn't make me wonder much about some peoples misconceived
(pardon the pun) ideas..."







I got it the first time. Interesting how belief and reality take

divergent paths, eh?

Could be, but art work is never reality.



Oh, I've seen "artwork" that so closely duplicates reality, anyone
would
be hard-pressed to tell the difference. But, then, that's not really
what we mean here, right?



Please don't take my comments about "faith" personally. I respect your
right to your religious beliefs and as I have mentioned more than once,
I am not an atheist...I am agnostic.

I think your agnosticism often spills over into politics more than the
ones with faith who you complain about does.





Really? You don't see me trying to pass laws that restrict gays.

You couldn't if you wanted to. To my knowledge, you've never held public
office of any sort. You're just an opinionated gas bag.

On 2/27/2014 1:41 PM, HanK wrote:
On 2/27/2014 10:31 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:45:29 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 9:39 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:57:26 AM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 8:55 AM, Tim wrote:


Pardon me. Allow me to repeat myself-



"Doesn't make me wonder much about some peoples misconceived
(pardon the pun) ideas..."







I got it the first time. Interesting how belief and reality take

divergent paths, eh?

Could be, but art work is never reality.



Oh, I've seen "artwork" that so closely duplicates reality, anyone
would
be hard-pressed to tell the difference. But, then, that's not really
what we mean here, right?



Please don't take my comments about "faith" personally. I respect your
right to your religious beliefs and as I have mentioned more than
once,
I am not an atheist...I am agnostic.

I think your agnosticism often spills over into politics more than the
ones with faith who you complain about does.





Really? You don't see me trying to pass laws that restrict gays.

You couldn't if you wanted to. To my knowledge, you've never held public
office of any sort. You're just an opinionated gas bag.

He would work to pass laws that hurt gays... as well as straights, men,
women, children, Americans in general, so again, he is lying...

On 2/27/14, 1:51 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/27/2014 1:41 PM, HanK wrote:
On 2/27/2014 10:31 AM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 10:35 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:45:29 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote:

On 2/27/14, 9:39 AM, Tim wrote:
On Thursday, February 27, 2014 7:57:26 AM UTC-6, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 2/27/14, 8:55 AM, Tim wrote:


Pardon me. Allow me to repeat myself-



"Doesn't make me wonder much about some peoples misconceived
(pardon the pun) ideas..."







I got it the first time. Interesting how belief and reality take

divergent paths, eh?

Could be, but art work is never reality.



Oh, I've seen "artwork" that so closely duplicates reality, anyone
would
be hard-pressed to tell the difference. But, then, that's not really
what we mean here, right?



Please don't take my comments about "faith" personally. I respect
your
right to your religious beliefs and as I have mentioned more than
once,
I am not an atheist...I am agnostic.

I think your agnosticism often spills over into politics more than the
ones with faith who you complain about does.





Really? You don't see me trying to pass laws that restrict gays.

You couldn't if you wanted to. To my knowledge, you've never held public
office of any sort. You're just an opinionated gas bag.

He would work to pass laws that hurt gays... as well as straights, men,
women, children, Americans in general, so again, he is lying...


Oh, really? What laws might those be, Scotty?