"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory
that Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his
vigilante style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his
neighborhood because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I
suppose the protest he organized a year prior in support of the black
homeless guy mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black
kids was all part of this master plan to get away with murder when the
opportunity presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym
trainer not to significantly improve his fighting skills and offered
help to neighbors whose houses were broken into ... all part of a
masterful, well conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become
unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him
and feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in
using deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be
appropriate.

On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory that
Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his vigilante
style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his neighborhood
because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I suppose the
protest he organized a year prior in support of the black homeless guy
mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black kids was all
part of this master plan to get away with murder when the opportunity
presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym trainer not to
significantly improve his fighting skills and offered help to neighbors
whose houses were broken into ... all part of a masterful, well
conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him and
feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in using
deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be appropriate.


Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.

On 7/24/2013 10:11 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Sorry. I forgot that earlier this month you postulated the theory that
Zimmerman's wounds were self-inflicted, ostensibly to mask his vigilante
style scheme to stalk, attack and shoot a black male in his neighborhood
because of his racist hatred of blacks in general. I suppose the
protest he organized a year prior in support of the black homeless guy
mistreated by the police and his tutoring of young black kids was all
part of this master plan to get away with murder when the opportunity
presented itself. He must have also convinced his gym trainer not to
significantly improve his fighting skills and offered help to neighbors
whose houses were broken into ... all part of a masterful, well
conceived plot.

More information is becoming available to the public regarding the
backgrounds and character profiles of both Zimmerman and Martin. Of
course there are those who will never acknowledge that maybe they were
wrong in their judgments, but the truth will eventually become
unavoidable.

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him and
feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in using
deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be appropriate.


Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.


What would he have punched martin with? The back of his head, or his nose?

"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have
punched
Zimmerman in the nose.

------------------------------------

Testimony in the trial suggests that it is unlikely that Zimmerman
threw *any* punches period. If he was the racist vigilante that you
like to promote, why throw a fist if you have a 9mm handgun strapped
to your belt?

In the end it doesn't matter who threw the first punch. The upheld
self defense claim has nothing to do with who threw the first punch,
who followed who or what anyone said to the other.

On 7/24/13 1:13 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 10:08 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 7/24/13 9:30 AM, Eisboch wrote:




There's nothing to suggest that Martin started the altercation.

--------------------------------

Zimmerman's nose provides a clue.


No, it doesn't.

----------------------------------------

Your comment postulated that Zimmerman's nose injury indicated Martin
started the fight. There's nothing on which to base that. Zimmerman
might well have punched Martin first, and Martin then might have punched
Zimmerman in the nose.

------------------------------------

Testimony in the trial suggests that it is unlikely that Zimmerman
threw *any* punches period. If he was the racist vigilante that you
like to promote, why throw a fist if you have a 9mm handgun strapped to
your belt?

In the end it doesn't matter who threw the first punch. The upheld self
defense claim has nothing to do with who threw the first punch, who
followed who or what anyone said to the other.



There were no witnesses, so I'm not sure what "testimony" would have
been valid. Obviously the lesson here is that if you want to kill
someone, make sure there are no witnesses.

In article
,
says...

Zimmerman broke no laws. He was getting the crap beaten out of him
and feared for his life. Under self-defense laws he was justified in
using deadly force, a conclusion that the jury also found to be
appropriate.

I see this continues.
Might be easier to just say "No, he didn't."
The other side then can say "Yes,he did."
More efficient.