On Tuesday, January 1, 2013 11:19:05 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1805701577378681744.653332bmckeenospam-

, says...



wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:

wrote:



On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:



In article ,







says...















Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...







http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html















What is YOUR solution?







Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles.







The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted



the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and



seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is



that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system



that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law.



All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms.



See what the control advocates in Canada have accomplished. You can have

you petty dictator run roughshod all he wants.



Here's how you do it:



http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexin...12/gun-control









And, to be crude, having few guns does mean that few people get shot. In

2008-2009, there were 39 fatal injuries from crimes involving firearms

in England and Wales, with a population about one sixth the size of

America?s. In America, there were 12,000 gun-related homicides in 2008.

Here's how who does it?
You do know that Canada makes it's own laws, eh?
That lady is talking about Britain. Being next door to y'all makes it much harder to control hand guns and ammunition.