In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

"iBoaterer" wrote in message
...

In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:43 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 8:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/28/2012 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:59 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:47:18 -0400, JustWait

wrote:

On 9/28/2012 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:08:07 -0700, jps
wrote:

You have any idea what happens in a 15 year old brain?
Idiocy, that's
what. Kid's brains are rewiring and their frontal cortex is
missing.
The brain stem is in control, immediate gratification.
Instead of
shooting him to death, perhaps he should have just taken him
to the
local police and have him experience the reality of being in
jail.

You assume the kid's only motive was to steal this woman's
Ipod

I find it troubling that he is going into a neighbor's home
wearing a
mask at 1 AM when he knows there is a woman in there alone.



... and it was his aunt...

I am sure there is more to this story than we know right now.

How are you so sure of that?

There is always more to the story when you are going from an
internet
post .


I saw a couple of the reports, and watch local news... It just
"seems"
to me like they are not telling the whole story. Very careful not
to
mention what the "weapon" was for one thing.

Amazing!!! The kid was carrying something so you just to the wild,
unfounded conclusion that it was a "weapon". What an insane fool!

Are you saying that what the kid was carrying couldn't be considered
a
weapon?

Your hand can be considered a weapon, dumbass. Should I shoot you dead
if you are out at night?

I love it when you contradict yourself.
I never wore a burglar costume when I was a kid.
Nowadays cops will shoot you for carrying a plastic gun replica.

What I asked, and you failed to answer was that your hand can be a
weapon, ie: anything could be called (by stupid people) a weapon,
therefore, should I shoot and kill you if you are out at night? OR do
you have to be a teenager in order for me to shoot you?

Learn one thing, dummy. You can't go around shooting people without
justification.

But where does this justification stop? It's been said in this thread
that someone should be shot and killed for doing... WHAT?

-----------------------------
For stupidity maybe. Stupidly being 15 years old, and outside in a burglary
outfit when you should be in bed. Then not surrendering when the other
person has a bigger weapon than you and does not know it is their son out to
pillage the neighbor.

"BAR" wrote in message
...

In article , says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:40:22 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Show me where the cops said it was a "weapon".


If this article is to be believed, it was a knife.

http://www.courant.com/community/new...new-fairfield-
shooting-0928-20120927,0,3870995.story

You can die as quickly with a knife wound as you can die with a gun-shot
wound. I tire-iron upside the head can kill you instantly.

--------------------------
Actually you are more likely to die from a knife wound than a gunshot wound.

On 9/29/2012 12:46 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:12 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:43:50 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:11 AM, iBoaterer wrote:

What I asked, and you failed to answer was that your hand can be a
weapon, ie: anything could be called (by stupid people) a weapon,
therefore, should I shoot and kill you if you are out at night? OR do
you have to be a teenager in order for me to shoot you?

We are going to find that out in Sanford, probably in the second week
of November, after the election.

That's just about as unfounded as Scotty's insane bull****.

My intuition says Greg's right.

Intuition is just another form of dreaming.

Maybe in your case, but I like to call it an educated guess.

Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

Well, sure it is, it's to make a point, that you can't believe a thing
he says here.


He who?

"jps" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 21:03:12 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:15 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:

It is an occupational hazard for "night time" burglars.

I'll ask again, should all kids who are out at night be killed?

===

The ones who are masked, armed, and trying to break into someone's
home?

I think it's perfectly reasonable.

The best part?

No repeat offenders.

Even if you don't believe in Darwin there's a certain poetic justice
to it.

Armed with what? A pair of pliers? Did you even bother to read the
article or anything related before passing judgment?

Sheesh.


----------------------
The report said a knife. As to being shot. Did you go out late at night
when you were 15, dressed in black with a black head covering? Looks like a
duck, quacks like a duck, probably is a duck. Did not really need a weapon,
but something shiny in the hands of a person dressed as a cat burglar in the
middle of the night, should be assumed to be a weapon.

On 9/29/2012 12:47 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 9/29/2012 12:15 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:09 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article m,
says...

On 9/29/2012 10:40 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article , says...

On 9/29/2012 9:12 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 9/29/2012 8:29 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On 9/28/2012 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:54:59 -0400, iBoaterer
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:47:18 -0400, JustWait

wrote:

On 9/28/2012 12:32 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:08:07 -0700, jps
wrote:

You have any idea what happens in a 15 year old brain?
Idiocy,
that's
what. Kid's brains are rewiring and their frontal cortex is
missing.
The brain stem is in control, immediate gratification.
Instead of
shooting him to death, perhaps he should have just taken
him to
the
local police and have him experience the reality of being
in jail.

You assume the kid's only motive was to steal this woman's
Ipod

I find it troubling that he is going into a neighbor's home
wearing a
mask at 1 AM when he knows there is a woman in there alone.



... and it was his aunt...

I am sure there is more to this story than we know right now.

How are you so sure of that?

There is always more to the story when you are going from an
internet
post .


I saw a couple of the reports, and watch local news... It just
"seems"
to me like they are not telling the whole story. Very careful
not to
mention what the "weapon" was for one thing.

Amazing!!! The kid was carrying something so you just to the wild,
unfounded conclusion that it was a "weapon". What an insane fool!

Are you saying that what the kid was carrying couldn't be
considered a
weapon?

The cops said it was a "weapon"... Please, just let kevin read the
article himself.. It might take him a few times, but really, are you
gonna' answer each and every fake question from him today? JPS and
Kevin
only want to make points in a newsgroup, they could care less for the
effected families and neighbors...

Show me where the cops said it was a "weapon".

Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

It's none of your business, is what I think.

All he has to do is google the local news stories like I did...

I don't give a **** what the local news says, YOU SAID that the *COPS*
said it was a weapon, and you lied, again.

Who's paying you, Donnie?

On 9/29/2012 12:50 PM, iBoaterer wrote:

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

Hell no! Again, that is what a damned REPORTER said. YOU said that the
COPS said he had a weapon. Are you too stupid to understand the
difference?


Did the reporter lie?

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:29 PM, JustWait wrote:
On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"


Now can we write the stupid **** off?

But...But Looky hasn't finished his cross examination.

None needed. I guess you and Scotty and Greg aren't bright enough to
understand the difference in what a reporter said and Scotty's assertion
that " COP" said he had a weapon.


One of these days you're going to choke on nits or loogies.

On 9/29/2012 12:51 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article om,
says...

On 9/29/2012 12:23 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:09:35 -0400, iBoaterer wrote:


Stop playing Dick Tracy. You will be shown the truth by the expert
investigators..........................in due time.

But Scotty said, and I quote: "The cops said it was a weapon". So he
really should be able to show me, wouldn't you think?

A police statement released by Lieutenant J. Paul Vance, a spokesman
for the Connecticut State Police, explains what happened next.
?Believing the suspect was armed with a weapon and about to attack
him, the (father) discharged his personal handgun at the suspect.? The
father then found the victim ?lying on the ground in the driveway with
obvious gunshot injuries, holding a weapon?.


"holding a weapon"

I wonder what the kid's rap sheet looks like? A peek at it might reveal
certain traits that might have a bearing on the case. It certainly did
in the Martin case.

Yep, true to FOXites everywhere, tried, convicted, hung without any
evidence.

Who told you there isn't any evidence?