Not much to go on. It looks like the larson may be better equipped, but
I like the interior style of the bayliner. The bayliner is newer, but
that doesn't necessarily mean squat. I guess it comes down to what you
think.

Bob Dimond

In article ,
(Trevor) wrote:

Given both in good condition (survey etc) - might I get some feedback
from this fine group on the following two boats?

http://adcache.boattraderonline.com/6/7/2/50710772.htm

http://adcache.boattraderonline.com/6/4/8/40244748.htm

Thanks much...

tcGb,
-trevor

Better yet. Look up the NADA or BUC valu and see which one is more in
line. Also in looking further into the description while I like the
Bayliner interior, I'd tend to go with the Larson if the the dealer
warranty is reasonable vs any used boat without any warranty.

Bob Dimond (again)

In article ,
(Bob D.) wrote:

Not much to go on. It looks like the larson may be better equipped, but
I like the interior style of the bayliner. The bayliner is newer, but
that doesn't necessarily mean squat. I guess it comes down to what you
think.

Bob Dimond

In article ,
(Trevor) wrote:

Given both in good condition (survey etc) - might I get some feedback
from this fine group on the following two boats?

http://adcache.boattraderonline.com/6/7/2/50710772.htm

http://adcache.boattraderonline.com/6/4/8/40244748.htm

Thanks much...

tcGb,
-trevor