On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of
employment taxes. Check it out.

so the rich got a tax DECREASE

the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your
rich buddies.


But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.

HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and
complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough!

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wf3h wrote:


the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the
Eisenhower administration.

kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax
policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay
increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay
increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle
class

welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wf3h wrote:
or.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.

HAHAHAHAH the WRECKED THE ECONOMY and you're sitting here telling me
how WONDERFUL the rich are

and you ASSHOLE...some HAVE been sent to jail

**** you're dumb! jesus christ, no wonder you're right wing!

You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

hey genius. your buddies....the right wing...deregulated the **** out
of bank robbery to protect the rich. the rich got a bailout, they got
a get out of jail card, all courtesy of the american right wing and
their LOVE affair with the rich

YOU are proof. the rich WRECKED this country and you STILL believe the
BULL**** about how they're the masters of the universe

On 09/08/2011 4:36 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:18:01 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 3:01 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

did their taxes go up 500% in the last 30 years? nope.

they dropped

their INCOMES went up 500% though, while middle class incomes went

nowhere

so your rightwing bull**** is a fable

Middle class got raises, they were soaked up in the steady rise of
employment taxes. Check it out.

so the rich got a tax DECREASE

the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

thanks. i already knew that. the mddle class ALWAYS bankrolls your
rich buddies.


But your just an ignorant dumb****, so I don't expect you to understand.
It is beyond your genetic capabilities.

HAHAHAHAH i love this. he lives in a 'socialist' paradise and
complains the US middle class isnt supporting the rich enough!

Bull****. Top 20% of the earners pay 80% of he taxes. You little
fleabeggars get a free lunch. But then when their are no more rich, you
can all share having nothing.

As for Canada, you would be surprised how much like the USA it real is.
But you can't experience living in 4 countries because of prior
criminal records and welfare residency requirements.
--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

On 09/08/2011 8:39 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wrote:
or.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.

HAHAHAHAH the WRECKED THE ECONOMY and you're sitting here telling me
how WONDERFUL the rich are

and you ASSHOLE...some HAVE been sent to jail

**** you're dumb! jesus christ, no wonder you're right wing!

You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

hey genius. your buddies....the right wing...deregulated the **** out
of bank robbery to protect the rich. the rich got a bailout, they got
a get out of jail card, all courtesy of the american right wing and
their LOVE affair with the rich

YOU are proof. the rich WRECKED this country and you STILL believe the
BULL**** about how they're the masters of the universe

Yea, and democrats and Obama gave it to them. What is your point?
Obama sell your ass out?

--
Seems like paying your bills with real money is no longer the accepted
behavior in USA. Perhaps that is the problem and not the the solution.

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:09 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 10:54 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:58:01 -0600,
wrote:

On 09/08/2011 9:35 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600,
wrote:

On 07/08/2011 4:18 PM, wrote:
From an article in the Economist:

"Food stamps, they argue, are far from lavish. Only those with incomes
of 130% of the poverty level or less are eligible for them. The amount
each person receives depends on their income, assets and family size,
but the average benefit is $133 a month and the maximum, for an
individual with no income at all, is $200."

and

"Food stamps also help stimulate the economy more than other forms of
government spending, points out Jim Weill of Food Research and Action
Centre, a charity, since their recipients are so poor that they tend
to spend them immediately. When Moody?s Analytics assessed different
forms of stimulus, it found that food stamps were the most effective,
increasing economic activity by $1.73 for every dollar spent.
Unemployment insurance came in second, at $1.62, whereas most tax cuts
yielded a dollar or less. All the talk in Washington these days,
however, is of cutbacks?even for the hungry."

Of course, the asshole teabagger Republicans don't give a crap about
the poor.

Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


Huh? So, you believe that the rich should not pay their fair share and
that any tax or imposition on them destroys America. You probably
claim to be a teagagger.

Rich already do pay MORE than their fair share idiot. All you do with
that line is tell us you never got of the bottom rung of society. Yep,
you are a loser.

No, they don't. You're too stupid to get it, so you believe paying a
CEO 500x a regular worker who pays a higher percentage in taxes is
just fine. You are the bottom rung.

Faact is your full of **** as you never have made minimum wage for 2
weeks....before your fat ass was fired. And that assumes you got hired
once upon a time.

Faaaaact is you live in a single-wide, scratching what you presume are
you balls but are in fact plump fleas.

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

Firstly, many of the American rev. DID have a problem with slaves.

But, yes, by comparison they're pretty tame. The difference of course
is that the teagaggers are mostly middle class, and were hoodwinked by
the very rich and connected to get THEIR taxes lowered. They tend to
have a poor understand of what gov't does, think it's evil, right up
until they're affected. Given the made up crisis of the debt ceiling,
the S&P downgrade, the market drop, they'll find out shortly that
they're the ones most affected.

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:10:04 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:48:50 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:43:32 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:00:08 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 07:18:07 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:00:31 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Hey, if the poor don't care why should we? After all they voted Obama
which means they don' care about America.


says the guy who wants america destroyed as long as the rich are
protected....and are white

Destroying the rich, destroys the poor.


tell it to king george

didnt work out the way your simplistic, reader's digest view thought,
did it/

Huh?

The people who organized the American revolution were rich men who
didn't want to pay taxes and did not have a problem with slaves,
indentured servants and overthrowing the government.

The tea party is pretty tame in comparison

john paulson made 3.7 BILLION trading CDO's as goldman sachs went into
the toilet

how'd that work out for your reader's digest view of the rich?

I have said many times they should have sent some of those guys to
jail but there were ZERO prosecutions from Obama.
You can say all you want bad about Bush but his DoJ did prosecute over
a dozen criminals from the Clinton era scams.

You're right.. Holder should have indicted Cheney.

On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:48:07 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 21:11:57 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:58:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400, wf3h wrote:


the middle class, courtesy of 30 years of right wing economics, got a
tax INCREASE

Bull****, we have the lowest tax rates for the middle class since the
Eisenhower administration.

kind of shows you how useless right wing tax policy is, doesnt it? tax
policy is so useless that the mddle class STILL hasnt had a pay
increase in 30 years while the richest 1% have had a 500% pay
increase. the richest have had their taxes cut by over 70%. the middle
class

welll...we got a lunch at mcdonalds

Those Eisenhower tax rates are deceptive. Rich people never paid
anything like what the rate would indicate because they had a lot more
tax shelters and things they could deduct.
The biggest reform of those tax shelters happened under Reagan (1986)

who raised taxes 11 times. bush's 2 tax cuts created much of our
deficit