Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Edgar" wrote in message I would expect a number of any deaths reported from canoes and kayaks are due to them being run down by fast power boats in the hands of idiots. Actually it is the paddler that is most often the idiot. I almost ran over a shell in a light fog in San Francisco Bay a couple years ago. Guy is in a white shell, wearing a white shirt, and is in the middle of the channel area. Luckily it was me, going maybe 20 mph and not the ferryboat doing 35 knots. You could hardly see the idiot at 30'. Is why my next yak is going to be a bright color. And I wear a bright red PFD when paddling. Sort of the same mentality as a lot of sailboaters. I am in a sailboat, I have the right of way. My wife got hit by a sailboat in Mission Bay, SD. while in a yak. Could not get completely out of the way. He is in the back, f'n around with something and the tiller is locked and he is doing 10-12 and is not looking at all where he is headed. I did not have the VHF with me at the time or he would be explaining the hit-run to the police and lifeguards. Could not get his numbers and the other witness didn't either. I have had sailboats with the motor running turn directly in front of me with a 90 degree term. And other sailboaters say, maybe he was not under power and only charging battery. BS. Motor running, is a power boat. Same as I heard a sailboater claim he had the right of way over a large tanker entering SF Bay. He will be both dead, and wrong. I a bit confused. First you're talking about a kayak in the fog that you almost hit because you were going 20 mph when you could hardly see 30 feet. Then you're complaining about the sailboat doing 10-12 (and what kind of sailboat goes 10-12, other than mine?) and doesn't see your wife's kayak. Sounds like anyone who comes near you or your wife is clearly at fault! And what's your point about misbehaving sailboats? Sure there are rude and/or ignorant sailors, but certainly not in greater proportion than power boater (or kayakers, for that matter). Frankly, the sailors and the small boat fisherman annoy me at times, but what really scares me are the sportfishers doing 30 knots in pea soup, because with radar and gps they think they're invincible. My wife's kayak was hit a glancing blow by a sail boat without anybody looking where it was going. Guy is in the back doing somethinng, but not piloting the boat. He was not near my wife, he hit the kayak and kept going! I could see other boats in the light fog, but the shell was white, low in the water, and he is wearing white and is crossing the channel. Put up an orange flag, or something to make yourself visable. I could see the other boats a lot further away than a low, white shell. I see where others annoy you as you figure you have the "right of way"over all other type craft. |
#63
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne.B" wrote in message
... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:29:14 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. That is the way the rules are being taught and interpreted these days. Taught by whom? Not out here, as far as I know. Training schools approved and monitored by USCG. That's too bad. It's not been my experience out here, but I suppose it happens. My understanding is that the approved schools really aren't monitored, certainly not closely. They typically get the curriculum approved, and that's about it beside submitting the completed tests. You're talking about regular sailing schools or license classes (e.g., OUPV, 100GT)? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#64
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
m... "Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Jeff" wrote in message ... I'd be curious to see the numbers. Canoe deaths were 80 last year, over 10% of the total; while kayak deaths were 34, or 5%. However, Kayak sales are about 4 times canoes, so there is a discrepancy. The two together have been selling about half a million a year recently, though falling off last year. So its quite possible that the number of "paddle boats" out there are equal to the number of small open power boats (or at least a significant percentage of them) which were involved in 350 deaths last year. So I could believe that canoes are responsible for a disproportional number of deaths, but not kayaks. My hunch is that most kayakers wear PFDs, but many canoe users are actually fishing and don't think they are at risk. Although I often wear a PFD while kayaking, I have trouble convincing my wife to do so, because we almost always kayak in very protecting fla****er, often only a few feet deep. I would expect a number of any deaths reported from canoes and kayaks are due to them being run down by fast power boats in the hands of idiots. Actually it is the paddler that is most often the idiot. I almost ran over a shell in a light fog in San Francisco Bay a couple years ago. Guy is in a white shell, wearing a white shirt, and is in the middle of the channel area. Luckily it was me, going maybe 20 mph and not the ferryboat doing 35 knots. You could hardly see the idiot at 30'. Is why my next yak is going to be a bright color. And I wear a bright red PFD when paddling. Sort of the same mentality as a lot of sailboaters. I am in a sailboat, I have the right of way. My wife got hit by a sailboat in Mission Bay, SD. while in a yak. Could not get completely out of the way. He is in the back, f'n around with something and the tiller is locked and he is doing 10-12 and is not looking at all where he is headed. I did not have the VHF with me at the time or he would be explaining the hit-run to the police and lifeguards. Could not get his numbers and the other witness didn't either. I have had sailboats with the motor running turn directly in front of me with a 90 degree term. And other sailboaters say, maybe he was not under power and only charging battery. BS. Motor running, is a power boat. Same as I heard a sailboater claim he had the right of way over a large tanker entering SF Bay. He will be both dead, and wrong. Technically, the engine needs to be engaged for it to be under power, but I agree with you. If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. I figure that the other guy is going to see the raw water coming out, and that might be enough to fool him. Why take a chance.... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com You get in a crash and and the motor is running and claim you were not in gear, and are a sailboat, you are going to lose! As long as the motor is on, your are technically a power boat. You could reach over and put it in gear. Same as if just before the crash you pop it into neutral. If an anchored powerboat is considered a powerboat when anchored, you think the court will let you get away claiming under sail status when the engine is running? No dispute from me, except that "technically" you're not a powerboat, unless the engine is engaged in driving the boat. Not sure what the anchor comment has to do with it, since you're not (obviously) underway. If you're unclear about what the rules actually say on the matter, look it up. I'm certain that you're right, however, when it comes to how a court would react. That's a seperate question, which is why I consider myself a powerboat if I have the engine on. It's not technically accurate, but it is accurate in practice. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com The motor on, and I bet the law would say power boat. As to day shapes, when was the last time you saw a recreational boater flying them. An anchored power boat is still a power boat in the laws eyes, and you could start the engine and drive out of the way. Same reason the court is going to find against a sailboater with motor running. You could engage motor an drive boat. I have no idea what the court would say. I suspect there would a lot of arguments for both sides, but the law itself is pretty clear. The vessel must be actually propelled. I've only seen one sailboat with the dayshape in 30 yrs of sailing on the bay. It was way over 12 meters. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#65
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... H the K wrote: On 10/18/09 9:47 PM, wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:34:54 -0400, wrote: So I could believe that canoes are responsible for a disproportional number of deaths, but not kayaks. My hunch is that most kayakers wear PFDs, but many canoe users are actually fishing and don't think they are at risk. Although I often wear a PFD while kayaking, I have trouble convincing my wife to do so, because we almost always kayak in very protecting fla****er, often only a few feet deep. The only difference I see is canoes can carry a bigger cooler so they may drink more beer. PFD use is spotty for both craft on our river. The real scary thing is they seem to have no respect for power boats and assume they are not only seen but will be yielded right of way. When the power boat is a PWC things can get real dicey since most PWC drivers refuse to give anyone quarter. They assume they have no wake. You're supposed to squeeze your cooler in an innertube and tow it behind your canoe or kayak. That way, the cool river water helps keep your ice from wasting away and your beer from tasting like Miller Lite. I like Miller Lite. You like Corona. Beer drinkers make fun Corona. Pacifico here... too many trips to Mexico! That and Guiness... too many trips to Ireland! -- Nom=de=Plume I rarely drink, but if in MX or a Mexican restaurant it is Negro Modelo. Dark beer is so much better. I don't like Mexican dark beer. It just doesn't have the flavor of Guiness. -- Nom=de=Plume Guiness is too dark and flavorful. Did not care for it when I traveled to the English office and everyone went to the pub. Lots of good ales, and stouts, but Guiness is not one my favorites. Best Stout I ever drank was at the Haines Brewery in Haines, AK. Did you have it warm (traditional) or chilled? I have been chastised because I prefer it cooled a bit. -- Nom=de=Plume |
#66
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:40:16 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:29:14 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. That is the way the rules are being taught and interpreted these days. Taught by whom? Not out here, as far as I know. Training schools approved and monitored by USCG. That's too bad. It's not been my experience out here, but I suppose it happens. Actually it might be a good thing in terms of educating the chowder heads who go around motoring with their mainsail up, and trying to press for right of way. My understanding is that the approved schools really aren't monitored, certainly not closely. They typically get the curriculum approved, and that's about it beside submitting the completed tests. You're talking about regular sailing schools or license classes (e.g., OUPV, 100GT)? License classes. Several different instructors have told me that admiralty courts have ruled that if propulsion is on and available, then the boat can not be considered under sail for purposes of collision avoidance. |
#67
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "nom=de=plume" wrote in message ... "Jim" wrote in message ... H the K wrote: On 10/18/09 9:47 PM, wrote: On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:34:54 -0400, wrote: So I could believe that canoes are responsible for a disproportional number of deaths, but not kayaks. My hunch is that most kayakers wear PFDs, but many canoe users are actually fishing and don't think they are at risk. Although I often wear a PFD while kayaking, I have trouble convincing my wife to do so, because we almost always kayak in very protecting fla****er, often only a few feet deep. The only difference I see is canoes can carry a bigger cooler so they may drink more beer. PFD use is spotty for both craft on our river. The real scary thing is they seem to have no respect for power boats and assume they are not only seen but will be yielded right of way. When the power boat is a PWC things can get real dicey since most PWC drivers refuse to give anyone quarter. They assume they have no wake. You're supposed to squeeze your cooler in an innertube and tow it behind your canoe or kayak. That way, the cool river water helps keep your ice from wasting away and your beer from tasting like Miller Lite. I like Miller Lite. You like Corona. Beer drinkers make fun Corona. Pacifico here... too many trips to Mexico! That and Guiness... too many trips to Ireland! -- Nom=de=Plume I rarely drink, but if in MX or a Mexican restaurant it is Negro Modelo. Dark beer is so much better. I don't like Mexican dark beer. It just doesn't have the flavor of Guiness. -- Nom=de=Plume Guiness is too dark and flavorful. Did not care for it when I traveled to the English office and everyone went to the pub. Lots of good ales, and stouts, but Guiness is not one my favorites. Best Stout I ever drank was at the Haines Brewery in Haines, AK. Did you have it warm (traditional) or chilled? I have been chastised because I prefer it cooled a bit. -- Nom=de=Plume I drank it just like the pub served it. |
#68
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. JG" wrote in message ons... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote in message easolutions... "Bill McKee" wrote in message m... "Edgar" wrote in message ... "Jeff" wrote in message ... I'd be curious to see the numbers. Canoe deaths were 80 last year, over 10% of the total; while kayak deaths were 34, or 5%. However, Kayak sales are about 4 times canoes, so there is a discrepancy. The two together have been selling about half a million a year recently, though falling off last year. So its quite possible that the number of "paddle boats" out there are equal to the number of small open power boats (or at least a significant percentage of them) which were involved in 350 deaths last year. So I could believe that canoes are responsible for a disproportional number of deaths, but not kayaks. My hunch is that most kayakers wear PFDs, but many canoe users are actually fishing and don't think they are at risk. Although I often wear a PFD while kayaking, I have trouble convincing my wife to do so, because we almost always kayak in very protecting fla****er, often only a few feet deep. I would expect a number of any deaths reported from canoes and kayaks are due to them being run down by fast power boats in the hands of idiots. Actually it is the paddler that is most often the idiot. I almost ran over a shell in a light fog in San Francisco Bay a couple years ago. Guy is in a white shell, wearing a white shirt, and is in the middle of the channel area. Luckily it was me, going maybe 20 mph and not the ferryboat doing 35 knots. You could hardly see the idiot at 30'. Is why my next yak is going to be a bright color. And I wear a bright red PFD when paddling. Sort of the same mentality as a lot of sailboaters. I am in a sailboat, I have the right of way. My wife got hit by a sailboat in Mission Bay, SD. while in a yak. Could not get completely out of the way. He is in the back, f'n around with something and the tiller is locked and he is doing 10-12 and is not looking at all where he is headed. I did not have the VHF with me at the time or he would be explaining the hit-run to the police and lifeguards. Could not get his numbers and the other witness didn't either. I have had sailboats with the motor running turn directly in front of me with a 90 degree term. And other sailboaters say, maybe he was not under power and only charging battery. BS. Motor running, is a power boat. Same as I heard a sailboater claim he had the right of way over a large tanker entering SF Bay. He will be both dead, and wrong. Technically, the engine needs to be engaged for it to be under power, but I agree with you. If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. I figure that the other guy is going to see the raw water coming out, and that might be enough to fool him. Why take a chance.... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com You get in a crash and and the motor is running and claim you were not in gear, and are a sailboat, you are going to lose! As long as the motor is on, your are technically a power boat. You could reach over and put it in gear. Same as if just before the crash you pop it into neutral. If an anchored powerboat is considered a powerboat when anchored, you think the court will let you get away claiming under sail status when the engine is running? No dispute from me, except that "technically" you're not a powerboat, unless the engine is engaged in driving the boat. Not sure what the anchor comment has to do with it, since you're not (obviously) underway. If you're unclear about what the rules actually say on the matter, look it up. I'm certain that you're right, however, when it comes to how a court would react. That's a seperate question, which is why I consider myself a powerboat if I have the engine on. It's not technically accurate, but it is accurate in practice. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com The motor on, and I bet the law would say power boat. As to day shapes, when was the last time you saw a recreational boater flying them. An anchored power boat is still a power boat in the laws eyes, and you could start the engine and drive out of the way. Same reason the court is going to find against a sailboater with motor running. You could engage motor an drive boat. I have no idea what the court would say. I suspect there would a lot of arguments for both sides, but the law itself is pretty clear. The vessel must be actually propelled. I've only seen one sailboat with the dayshape in 30 yrs of sailing on the bay. It was way over 12 meters. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com The rule is under power, not propelled. |
#69
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:32:26 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:44:15 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. That is the way the rules are being taught and interpreted these days. Not really. Even Americas Cup racers are permitted to run an engine for charging purposes while racing. I have an outboard on my boat. If I am just noodling around and not trying to set any speed records, I may leave the engine in the water while sailing, even though it is not running. That may look like I'm motoring to you, but if you don't see a black sphere hanging from my spreaders, or a steaming light, I'm a sailboat. That's the LAW. No it is not. A black sphere signifies that you are at anchor. You should have said 'cone apex downward' |
#70
![]()
posted to rec.boats,rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:40:16 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:29:14 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: If I turn on my engine, even if it's in neutral, I consider myself a powerboat. That is the way the rules are being taught and interpreted these days. Taught by whom? Not out here, as far as I know. Training schools approved and monitored by USCG. That's too bad. It's not been my experience out here, but I suppose it happens. Actually it might be a good thing in terms of educating the chowder heads who go around motoring with their mainsail up, and trying to press for right of way. My understanding is that the approved schools really aren't monitored, certainly not closely. They typically get the curriculum approved, and that's about it beside submitting the completed tests. You're talking about regular sailing schools or license classes (e.g., OUPV, 100GT)? License classes. Several different instructors have told me that admiralty courts have ruled that if propulsion is on and available, then the boat can not be considered under sail for purposes of collision avoidance. There's a (slightly) subtle point here. If you had power available and did not use it to avoid a collision, that's your bad. On the other hand, you can't look at a sailboat and say "He looks like a chowderhead, I'll bet he has his motor running" and treat him as a powerboat. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crikey...an ounce of prevention... | General | |||
effective prevention and recovery of sinusitis | General | |||
Flying Pig Prevention Measures | Cruising | |||
Mold and Mildew Prevention in Locked Boat | Cruising | |||
Boat Crime Prevention Tips | General |