On Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:03:16 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:27:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:19:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
om...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:58:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
news:5epsb5hdga0s56qisgrd4rrumc1qqj5qv6@4ax .com...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
newsf6dnQN93_wvxCPXnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@ear thlink.com...


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the
navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H


Where did I say I thought it wasn't? If you're asking, then yes, it's
pretty
offensive.

Then you should have the 'chesticles' to say something just as you
have to others who've said something you found offensive.
--

John H


You're claiming I'm supposed to look at every post in the newsgroup and
condemn everything that's offensive. Sorry, but that's a full time job,
and
I already have a job. I believe he said it to/about someone besides me
here,
and I suspect that person is capable of defending himself.

Why don't you take it on as a job.

However, if something says something in my direction that's offensive,
I'm
willing to point it out. Aren't you?

I was referring to a post made in response to yours. That could be
considered somewhat different than looking 'at every post in the
newsgroup', as you erroneously claimed I claimed.
--

John H


As I said, I'm not responsible for what others say, especially about other
people. Are you advocating some sort of censurship program?

You find a post responding to you 'pretty offensive', yet you say
nothing about it until it is brought to your attention.

I'm not required, nor am I capable of commenting on every post that I may or
may not find offensive, especially when it's not directed to me. You really
don't need to "bring it to my attention," as I would prefer to ignore posts
that aren't about me or to me and are about someone else.


The post was *to* you.


Strange, that's all. Might cause one to question whether you're really
not just another follower of HK.

Go in peace to love and serve your messiah.

What's strange is your obsession with HK. He's posted lots of times as a
follow-up to one of my posts, and I rarely reply. I'm not willing to play
that game, and I don't typically fuel someone else's loathing or animous.
Sounds to me like you can't or won't follow that kind of reasoned response
(or non-response I suppose).

Who is my "messaih"? I think I know who you seem to insist it is, but why
not just say it. You'll likely feel better.

Guess.

--

John H