On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:19:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:58:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
newsf6dnQN93_wvxCPXnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@earthli nk.com...


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H


Where did I say I thought it wasn't? If you're asking, then yes, it's
pretty
offensive.

Then you should have the 'chesticles' to say something just as you
have to others who've said something you found offensive.
--

John H


You're claiming I'm supposed to look at every post in the newsgroup and
condemn everything that's offensive. Sorry, but that's a full time job, and
I already have a job. I believe he said it to/about someone besides me here,
and I suspect that person is capable of defending himself.

Why don't you take it on as a job.

However, if something says something in my direction that's offensive, I'm
willing to point it out. Aren't you?

I was referring to a post made in response to yours. That could be
considered somewhat different than looking 'at every post in the
newsgroup', as you erroneously claimed I claimed.
--

John H

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:19:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
. ..
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:58:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
m...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
newsf6dnQN93_wvxCPXnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@earthl ink.com...


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the
navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H


Where did I say I thought it wasn't? If you're asking, then yes, it's
pretty
offensive.

Then you should have the 'chesticles' to say something just as you
have to others who've said something you found offensive.
--

John H


You're claiming I'm supposed to look at every post in the newsgroup and
condemn everything that's offensive. Sorry, but that's a full time job,
and
I already have a job. I believe he said it to/about someone besides me
here,
and I suspect that person is capable of defending himself.

Why don't you take it on as a job.

However, if something says something in my direction that's offensive, I'm
willing to point it out. Aren't you?

I was referring to a post made in response to yours. That could be
considered somewhat different than looking 'at every post in the
newsgroup', as you erroneously claimed I claimed.
--

John H


As I said, I'm not responsible for what others say, especially about other
people. Are you advocating some sort of censurship program?

--
Nom=de=Plume

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"JustWait" wrote in message
...
In article 2d838706-3c98-43a4-937c-f75a232aab48
@o36g2000vbl.googlegroups.com, says...
On Sep 25, 7:17 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jack" wrote in message

...
On Sep 25, 5:22 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:





"Jack" wrote in message
...
On Sep 25, 3:50 pm, "nom=de=plume" wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:
"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I
stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my
word.
I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of
doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will
see
that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce.
Frogwatch
Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread
and
we
haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was
never
much
of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go
fast,
I
take
a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like.
Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our
exchanges,
even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining
the
"trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't
want
to participate anymore.
Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to
understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their
heads
in
agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time
about
politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we
can
have
a lively discussion without screeching.
I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some
folk
here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and insult
family
members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone
expressing an opinion on politics or religeon.
You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking
with
a
bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have
anything better to do?
Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable
people
Jimmy
Bob.
--
Nom=de=Plume
Like most liberals, you're numerically and judgmentally challenged.
Like most people, I call them the way I see them.
Hmm... the two aren't mutually exclusive.
Have a good weekend!
Hmmm... I don't disparage those who have a different political
philosophy.

"Unlike Republicans, Democrats are much less monolithic."
"Perhaps they're clinging to their guns and bibles"
"Or are you talking about Republicans, who didn't lift a finger when
Bush spent
like crazy? "
"Sickening. Glen Beck/Rush Limbaugh mentality."
"Are you telling us you condone what the previous president *you* put
in
office did? Feel free to insult me or say it's Bush rationale if that
makes
you feel better. "

That's just a quick review of a few of your posts where you most
definitley *did* attempt to disparage those who have a different
political philosophy. I'm sure you'll now say that they are just your
observations, but they, by definition, "disparage those who have a
different political philosophy".

Words do have meaning, you know.
YEAH! Remember, is, is!! Well unless it isn't... um, is, is not...
whatever...

Woooo.... Clinton got a blow job. Call CNN.

Classy


You, errr... brought it up. Sorry.

brought what up?

On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:27:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:19:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:58:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
om...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
newsf6dnQN93_wvxCPXnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@earth link.com...


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the
navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H


Where did I say I thought it wasn't? If you're asking, then yes, it's
pretty
offensive.

Then you should have the 'chesticles' to say something just as you
have to others who've said something you found offensive.
--

John H


You're claiming I'm supposed to look at every post in the newsgroup and
condemn everything that's offensive. Sorry, but that's a full time job,
and
I already have a job. I believe he said it to/about someone besides me
here,
and I suspect that person is capable of defending himself.

Why don't you take it on as a job.

However, if something says something in my direction that's offensive, I'm
willing to point it out. Aren't you?

I was referring to a post made in response to yours. That could be
considered somewhat different than looking 'at every post in the
newsgroup', as you erroneously claimed I claimed.
--

John H


As I said, I'm not responsible for what others say, especially about other
people. Are you advocating some sort of censurship program?

You find a post responding to you 'pretty offensive', yet you say
nothing about it until it is brought to your attention.

Strange, that's all. Might cause one to question whether you're really
not just another follower of HK.

Go in peace to love and serve your messiah.
--

John H

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:48:38 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Don White" wrote in message
...
"Jim" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Sweetcheeks, you have your bloomers all wedged up. Lighten up. Forget
about politics for a while. Tell us about your boating adventure with
that older couple. After all you signed on here to discuss boating,
didn't you?
That has to be the most sexist remark ever posted here.
Congratulations Flatulent Jim. You've finally discovered your one true
talent.
I'm hoping he isn't going to make a corset remark. Sorry, stupid pun.

It's strange that both you and Donnie find offensive a comment about
bloomers, yet a comment such as the following is acceptable:

"He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the
navy."

--

John H

John, I think Bloomers is onto Harry's act already, But Donny boy still
hasn't a clue.

nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"Frogwatch" wrote in message
...
It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific though. I
stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have kept my
word.
I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit of
doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you will see
that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce.

Frogwatch
Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another thread and
we
haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I was
never much
of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go
fast, I take
a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like.
Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our exchanges,
even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am joining
the
"trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I don't
want
to participate anymore.
Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to
understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their
heads in agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the
time about politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers
and we can have a lively discussion without screeching.

I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's some
folk here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and
insult family members at every opportunity. It's usually in response
to someone expressing an opinion on politics or religeon.
You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking with
a bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you have
anything better to do?
Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable people
Jimmy Bob.

Who is this Bob fella. No sirre Bob. Us conservatives are the reasonable
ones. You loons that fawn over liers, cheats, and thieves are the crazy
ones. Krausie and company which includes you are beating a dead horse
over all this political and economic nonsense. You cant change nuttin by
bawling and blustering about it here. Go join some political action
group or do something useful with your life instead of boring us to
tears.

Who's "Sweetie"? No such person here.

Go yourself. You don't get to tell me what to do.

Sweetie fits you better than name of the pen.


It's not my name. Do you not like Jimmybob?


Plume isn't your name either.

Don White wrote:
"Jim" ""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
Sweetcheeks, you have your bloomers all wedged up. Lighten up. Forget
about politics for a while. Tell us about your boating adventure with that
older couple. After all you signed on here to discuss boating, didn't you?

That has to be the most sexist remark ever posted here.
Congratulations Flatulent Jim. You've finally discovered your one true
talent.



Get back to us when you are equally upset about your leader's posts.
Until then...STFU, dummy.

H the K wrote:
On 9/26/09 1:50 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
"Jim"""tj\"@florida,com" wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:54:06 -0400, H the K
wrote:

On 9/25/09 7:17 PM, nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:50:21 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...
nom=de=plume wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:13:58 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

wrote in message
...

It isn't me, blame someone else. He/she is prolific
though. I
stopped posting political stuff for our truce and have
kept my
word.
I always thought jps was HK but will give him/her the benefit
of
doubt. If y'all will look back at Toots first posts, you
will
see
that I tried to discourage him/her due to said truce.

Frogwatch
Hey, a couple of us are discussing philosophy in another
thread
and
we
haven't come to blows yet. I think boating is a philosophy. I
was
never
much
of a power boater.. don't see the attraction.. if I want to go
fast,
I
take
a plane. Sailing on the other hand, seems very zen-like.
Ms Plume has been a cogent poster here and I enjoyed our
exchanges,
even if we don't agree on a lot of things but I think I am
joining the
"trusers" myself. When discussions simply become insults I
don't
want
to participate anymore.

Thanks! Agreement is over-rated anyway. It doesn't add much to
understanding if all you have is a bunch of people nodding their
heads
in
agreement. When I'm with my close friends, we argue all the time
about
politics and religion. A couple of them are Born-againers and we
can
have
a lively discussion without screeching.

I'm afraid you won't see that happening here, Sweetie. There's
some
folk
here that are programmed to holler racist, bigot, moron, and
insult
family
members at every opportunity. It's usually in response to someone
expressing an opinion on politics or religeon.
You never answered John about why you get so aroused over talking
with a
bunch of nasty old men about religion and politics. Don't you
have
anything better to do?

Pot, kettle, black. Looks like you're outnumbered by reasonable
people
Jimmy
Bob.
Why are you not thanking Harry for his insightful personality
assessments?

He's a great man to have on your side!
--

John H

Harry is not on my "side" and I'm not on his.


Please...you're confusing the moron.
By "side" he means you'll offer your skirt as a hiding place.

Well, I don't usually wear a skirt.


I didn't imagine you as the feminine type.


Have you been mistaken for one?



He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the navy.




Add that to your *writer's* resume. It's legendary!

H the K wrote:
On 9/26/09 2:30 PM, Don White wrote:
"H the wrote in message
news


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.




Might also explain his cowardice today...




But you don't *see* his posts - remember!

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:

"H the K" wrote in message
news

He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the navy.


Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H

He's dumb and can only do his best to follow his leader.