On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:27:42 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:19:17 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:58:03 -0700, "nom=de=plume"
wrote:

"JohnH" wrote in message
om...
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 15:30:58 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"H the K" wrote in message
newsf6dnQN93_wvxCPXnZ2dnUVZ_jRi4p2d@earth link.com...


He was the bendover and pick up that soap boy when he was in the
navy.



Explains why he has such fond memories of his 'service' days.


You, like the plum, find nothing offensive about this kind of talk?
--

John H


Where did I say I thought it wasn't? If you're asking, then yes, it's
pretty
offensive.

Then you should have the 'chesticles' to say something just as you
have to others who've said something you found offensive.
--

John H


You're claiming I'm supposed to look at every post in the newsgroup and
condemn everything that's offensive. Sorry, but that's a full time job,
and
I already have a job. I believe he said it to/about someone besides me
here,
and I suspect that person is capable of defending himself.

Why don't you take it on as a job.

However, if something says something in my direction that's offensive, I'm
willing to point it out. Aren't you?

I was referring to a post made in response to yours. That could be
considered somewhat different than looking 'at every post in the
newsgroup', as you erroneously claimed I claimed.
--

John H


As I said, I'm not responsible for what others say, especially about other
people. Are you advocating some sort of censurship program?

You find a post responding to you 'pretty offensive', yet you say
nothing about it until it is brought to your attention.

Strange, that's all. Might cause one to question whether you're really
not just another follower of HK.

Go in peace to love and serve your messiah.
--

John H