On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:59:06 -0400, "lupowell" wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:03:13 -0400, HK wrote:

jps wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 09:57:50 -0400, "lupowell" wrote:

"Wizard of Woodstock" wrote in message
...
"Neither the acceleration nor the jobs goal are new. Both represent a
White House repackaging of promises and projects to blunt criticism
that the effects haven't been worth the historic price tag. And the
job estimate is so murky, it can never be verified."

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20090609/D98MRQU80.html

One term, as in Carter's fiasco. We need new leadership - other than
Palin
or Gingrich in 2012. Here's hoping someone rises from the ashes....

Gingrich has risen from the ashes. That's your plan?

Have you ever heard the hope is not a plan?


What could be funnier than the frontrunners for the 2012 GOP nomination
being Newt Gingrich, a retreaded congressman with serious ethical
issues, and Sarah Palin, a simple-minded, ignorant woman whose
intellectual gaffes are emblazoned on hours of "HD" videotape?

Bring 'em on...

It's embarassing these buffoons could be put forward by one of the two
US policial parties to be leaders of our country and the free world.

A joke is putting it kindly.

If Palin or Newt are the only choices in 2012, might as well go for the
Libertarian candidate; certainly not for the Messiah and his hand puppet.

That'll put you squarely in the losing camp. I'd start searching high
schools for who may bring some ideas and value to the party by 2016.