"Boater" wrote in message
...

Eisboch wrote:

Maybe not. Some of your own party members are complaining that it is
starting to look like
four more years of the same.

Eisboch


I hadn't noticed that Obama was appointing incompetent party hacks or
ideologues the way Bush did and does.

Anyone who thought Obama was "radical" wasn't paying attention. Obama is a
centrist who leans slightly left of center.

There will be plenty of "change" the next four years, beginning 20 January
2009.

I previously published a list of 10 changes I would like to see the
incoming administration make. I'm confident Obama will make all of them.

Meanwhile, I see that your boy, President "Call me a Total Failure" Bush
is still appointing right-wing numnutzies to federal jobs, and pushing
through rules and regulations to continue screwing with the environment
and worker safety. He's a regular piece of ****, right to the end, an
incompetent who has done his very best to ruin this country,


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.

Eisboch

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.

Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to they
belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.

Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)


Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:41:02 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


Welcome to the club.
--
*****Have a Spectacular Day!*****

John H

JohnH wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:41:02 -0500, Tom Francis - SWSports
wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.
And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


Welcome to the club.


Why, it's John Herring...the "Christian."

Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie and
his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


I'm pulling your leg - again - Tom. An interesting fact about you is
that you like to pull the legs of others, but when others do it to you,
you get ****ed - fast. You also get very upset very fast when others
deign to question your opinions. As evidence of the latter, I offer up
your defensiveness about eTec outboards and 4/3'ds format cameras.

I think McCain was badly used by the GOP. I think he is a better man
than the one his campaign depicted. But I don't think he wears his age
and his hard life well, and I believe they caught up to him during the
campaign.

My opinion on Palin, though, is the same: brainless. dangerous,
ideologue and first-class ditz.

Boater wrote:
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:50:24 -0500, Boater
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The
complaints are
coming from your flock.
Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?
OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)
Tom is just sore because his over-the-hill idea-less pseudorightie
and his dumb bimbo running mate lost big time.

And right there is the reason you are despised and reviled by all who
participate here.

And yes - I did say all.

You cannot, and are incapable of, discussing issues in a calm rational
manner without getting into personal insults and outrageous
statements. You can't keep up, so you resort to negativity.

Ask around Harry - I've often defended you in side conversations with
different participants, but sometimes when you post crap like this, it
becomes very hard to do.

You are nothing more than a slightly more literate slammer2. You are
all venom and spite just like slammer.

So, with that in mind, I'm through with you for a while.

Again.


I'm pulling your leg - again - Tom. An interesting fact about you is
that you like to pull the legs of others, but when others do it to you,
you get ****ed - fast. You also get very upset very fast when others
deign to question your opinions. As evidence of the latter, I offer up
your defensiveness about eTec outboards and 4/3'ds format cameras.

You need to work on you ass kissing.

I think McCain was badly used by the GOP. I think he is a better man
than the one his campaign depicted. But I don't think he wears his age
and his hard life well, and I believe they caught up to him during the
campaign.

McCain is an idiot. Always was and always will be. Just ask his mother.

My opinion on Palin, though, is the same: brainless. dangerous,
ideologue and first-class ditz.

Your opinion means nothing.

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:42:48 -0600, wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 05:36:51 -0600, thunder wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 06:25:24 -0500, Eisboch wrote:


I am not the one doing the complaining about Obama. The complaints are
coming from your flock.

Are you sure? Those that are writing those articles, whose flock to
they belong to? Personally, I haven't heard any complaints, have you?

OK, OK, there is Tom. ;-)

YAY!!! Somebody loves me!!! :)