"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm
not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

Too late! Bush couldn't say it right either. ;-)

But, you don't really think any president could create a theocracy do you?
That means you'd rather have a man who CAN and WILL TRY to turn the country
into a socialist country over a woman who could not turn the country into a
theocracy?

See what I mean about female logic? It's just not logical.


Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I
might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no.

Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive
experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between
your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or
what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not supporting
McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic.

--
Gregory Hall