Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:21:03 -0700, "Lloyd Sumpter"
wrote: Wow - am I ever glad I live in Canada! I've NEVER been stopped or boarded: not in 40 years of boating on everything from runabouts to skiffs to dinghies to 36-ft sailboats. (I've also never been asked for my fishing license. Go figure...) Never been stopped in my 33 foot sailboat in Toronto, have been stopped twice in the Inner Harbour in my Zodiac by Metro Marine (water cops, local, but using federal safety regs at hand). They've seemed faintly disappointed, particularly given my piratical appearance, to find a proper PFD, bailer, heaving line, flares, signalling device, handheld VHF, GPS and extra oars, boat hook and engine spares aboard my 10 foot RIB. Thank goodness they weren't looking for dope G. R. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:21:03 -0700, "Lloyd Sumpter"
wrote: Wow - am I ever glad I live in Canada! I've NEVER been stopped or boarded: not in 40 years of boating on everything from runabouts to skiffs to dinghies to 36-ft sailboats. (I've also never been asked for my fishing license. Go figure...) Lloyd "Far Cove" Catalina 36 Hmm. Try living in the State of Victoria, Australia. Our State Gov just sees yachties and boaties as a revenue stream. You need a liscence for your boat (we get around that since we're registered as a ship with the Commonwealth Gov) plus a personal annual liscence for anyone who might move the boat under power. Serious penalties if you let an unliscenced friend "have a go" one day. The test itself has nothing to do with driving a boat! Oh, and fishing permits of course. And you can be stopped by the Water Police, Coatguard and Fisheries. We've been stopped a few times because we don't have the State boat liscence showing. We point out we don't need one and that we have the ships number on our stern. They tell us it is too small - it is if it were a State registration number, but it's fine as a Commonwealth registration. We show them our letter from the State Marine Board confirming we are exempt from the State liscence. To protect it, it's sealed in clear plastic - they complain they can't check it's legit. To make themselves feel useful, they check the safety gear ("Yes, the fire blanket is up to date with its certification") and sometimes breathalyse you for good measure before zooming off. I have no problem with safety gear checks. Our Water Police are bloody good, but I feel realy sorry them being dragged into this paperwork war so the fat pollie cats in Spring Street can go on another fact finding misson to Barbados! Peter www.oceanodyssey.net Peter & Jean looking for sponsors for the Melbourne-Osaka in 2007, and promising we will get round to updating our website this year. "Do not measure your life by the number of breaths you take, Rather by the number of times life just takes your breath away" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:21:03 -0700, "Lloyd Sumpter"
wrote: Wow - am I ever glad I live in Canada! I've NEVER been stopped or boarded: not in 40 years of boating on everything from runabouts to skiffs to dinghies to 36-ft sailboats. (I've also never been asked for my fishing license. Go figure...) Lloyd "Far Cove" Catalina 36 Hmm. Try living in the State of Victoria, Australia. Our State Gov just sees yachties and boaties as a revenue stream. You need a liscence for your boat (we get around that since we're registered as a ship with the Commonwealth Gov) plus a personal annual liscence for anyone who might move the boat under power. Serious penalties if you let an unliscenced friend "have a go" one day. The test itself has nothing to do with driving a boat! Oh, and fishing permits of course. And you can be stopped by the Water Police, Coatguard and Fisheries. We've been stopped a few times because we don't have the State boat liscence showing. We point out we don't need one and that we have the ships number on our stern. They tell us it is too small - it is if it were a State registration number, but it's fine as a Commonwealth registration. We show them our letter from the State Marine Board confirming we are exempt from the State liscence. To protect it, it's sealed in clear plastic - they complain they can't check it's legit. To make themselves feel useful, they check the safety gear ("Yes, the fire blanket is up to date with its certification") and sometimes breathalyse you for good measure before zooming off. I have no problem with safety gear checks. Our Water Police are bloody good, but I feel realy sorry them being dragged into this paperwork war so the fat pollie cats in Spring Street can go on another fact finding misson to Barbados! Peter www.oceanodyssey.net Peter & Jean looking for sponsors for the Melbourne-Osaka in 2007, and promising we will get round to updating our website this year. "Do not measure your life by the number of breaths you take, Rather by the number of times life just takes your breath away" |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around the Kemah / Galveston Bay area, the best way to be boarded is to have
a bunch of bikinis or even less scantily clad beauties in plain view. That's about all the watercops pay any attention to around here. You could scream through the no wake zone at 50 mph and they couldn't care less... I guess the equivalent of doughnut shops on the water. -- Keith __ 'No, `Eureka' is Greek for `this bath is too hot.'' -- Dr. Who "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... (Capt Lou) wrote in : If the Coast Guard continues to board vessels with the latest CGAUX safe boating decals displayed, why bother getting a decal? How many times a month does a boat need to be boarded and inspected? Besides, the 2004 USCGAUX decal has an isnurance company's name printed on it. I am cutting it off of mine. You should own a jetboat in Charleston, Capt Lou. There are several police bureaucracies all looking for targets: City of Charleston County of Charleston USCG Dept of Natural Resources dressed up like SWAT teams in camo'd boats you can't see in the dark trying to kill themselves and the person who ran over them. They think Wappoo Cut is in the Mekong Delta and are playing GI Joe. My little yellow Sea Rayder had the USCG-AUX current decal on it and I even pointed it out to the Coasties. It meant nothing and was a waste of my boating time to get the boat inspected. The inspection report from the Coasties WAS worth keeping, however. I kept it handy at the helm to show the other bureaucrats and they accepted the inspection report, even if it were a few months old. I simply offered it with my driver's license and the boat tax verification (registration) card. Showing it passed, only a few went snooping around in the engine/storage compartment to make sure I wasn't trying to sneak any Budweiser across the boarder from Mt Pleasant. Many of the unconstitutional stops-for-no-reason were thinly disguised drug raids without warrant or valid reasons. They dug around in the boat, I think, because there were teens aboard my boat. It's nonsense and ought to be stopped. I don't remember signing away any of the Amendments to our Constitution at the DNR boat license office....... Larry W4CSC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Around the Kemah / Galveston Bay area, the best way to be boarded is to have
a bunch of bikinis or even less scantily clad beauties in plain view. That's about all the watercops pay any attention to around here. You could scream through the no wake zone at 50 mph and they couldn't care less... I guess the equivalent of doughnut shops on the water. -- Keith __ 'No, `Eureka' is Greek for `this bath is too hot.'' -- Dr. Who "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... (Capt Lou) wrote in : If the Coast Guard continues to board vessels with the latest CGAUX safe boating decals displayed, why bother getting a decal? How many times a month does a boat need to be boarded and inspected? Besides, the 2004 USCGAUX decal has an isnurance company's name printed on it. I am cutting it off of mine. You should own a jetboat in Charleston, Capt Lou. There are several police bureaucracies all looking for targets: City of Charleston County of Charleston USCG Dept of Natural Resources dressed up like SWAT teams in camo'd boats you can't see in the dark trying to kill themselves and the person who ran over them. They think Wappoo Cut is in the Mekong Delta and are playing GI Joe. My little yellow Sea Rayder had the USCG-AUX current decal on it and I even pointed it out to the Coasties. It meant nothing and was a waste of my boating time to get the boat inspected. The inspection report from the Coasties WAS worth keeping, however. I kept it handy at the helm to show the other bureaucrats and they accepted the inspection report, even if it were a few months old. I simply offered it with my driver's license and the boat tax verification (registration) card. Showing it passed, only a few went snooping around in the engine/storage compartment to make sure I wasn't trying to sneak any Budweiser across the boarder from Mt Pleasant. Many of the unconstitutional stops-for-no-reason were thinly disguised drug raids without warrant or valid reasons. They dug around in the boat, I think, because there were teens aboard my boat. It's nonsense and ought to be stopped. I don't remember signing away any of the Amendments to our Constitution at the DNR boat license office....... Larry W4CSC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry,
I hear ya, our rights are being revoked, all in the name of terrorism. Paul "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... snipped Many of the unconstitutional stops-for-no-reason were thinly disguised drug raids without warrant or valid reasons. They dug around in the boat, I think, because there were teens aboard my boat. It's nonsense and ought to be stopped. I don't remember signing away any of the Amendments to our Constitution at the DNR boat license office....... Larry W4CSC |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
USCG inspections and their legal power to do them have been a reality
for many years and have little to do with Homeland "Security". In fact, with the new burdens and meager funding increase the CG will be hard pressed to do as many as they have in the past. Paul Schilter wrote: Larry, I hear ya, our rights are being revoked, all in the name of terrorism. Paul "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... snipped Many of the unconstitutional stops-for-no-reason were thinly disguised drug raids without warrant or valid reasons. They dug around in the boat, I think, because there were teens aboard my boat. It's nonsense and ought to be stopped. I don't remember signing away any of the Amendments to our Constitution at the DNR boat license office....... Larry W4CSC -- Glenn Ashmore I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which rights, specifically were revoked?
-- Scott Vernon Plowville PA __/)__/)__ "Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote in message ... Larry, I hear ya, our rights are being revoked, all in the name of terrorism. Paul "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... snipped Many of the unconstitutional stops-for-no-reason were thinly disguised drug raids without warrant or valid reasons. They dug around in the boat, I think, because there were teens aboard my boat. It's nonsense and ought to be stopped. I don't remember signing away any of the Amendments to our Constitution at the DNR boat license office....... Larry W4CSC |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:48:27 GMT, "Scott Vernon"
wrote (with possible editing): Which rights, specifically were revoked? Amendment IV - The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Some would also say: Amendment VIII - Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Btw, no flame intended here. I personally believe when Ashcroft proposed Patriot Act I and the provisions of Patriot Act II which were subsequently buried in other legislation, he crossed the line. -- Larry Email to rapp at lmr dot com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
where to buy ex coast guard or river police Rigid inflatable boats | General | |||
Just a few names... | General | |||
Coast Guard Auxiliary sold Safety Decal? | General | |||
Coast Guard Auxiliary and Homeland Security | General |