Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. Not necessarily so. One can just as well read it as these "automatic and free licenses" still carry certain obligations. The question is can one REJECT these licenses and remain unencumbered? Or better yet does the license have standing if it is automatic and free? Wilbur Hubbard |
#12
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Capt. JG" wrote in
easolutions: Dear Santa Clause: I read the link about the new EPA "MARPOL" regs.... Im already compliant. Its just good seamnaship. So what is the big deal? Can we still **** over the side of the floating docks if that lady that always screams and reports us to the office isn't looking and we're not ****ing on someone's overpriced gelcoat? How about in our dingies hanging it out to LEEWARD THIS TIME, PLEASE? When you gotta go you GOTTA GO...EPA or no EPA! I think she was trying to look at my willie and figured, rightly, I'd turn around towards the screaming when I heard it.....I did, nearly peeing on Lloyd who was also peeing to lee! Why do men pee off a dock? BECAUSE WE CAN! |
#13
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in
: If your state drops the ball on sending the necessary letter of tribute and submission to Washington, all recreational vessels with that state The last time the damned Yankees pulled this kind of crap, the Citadel Cadets in Ft Moultrie caused a helluva ruckus by firing the cannons on Ft Sumter, where the Yankee Army was holed up at the entrance to the harbor. We all know what happened then! Someone needs to remind Washington Bureaucrats the Citadel Cadets can STILL aim a big pounder pretty accurately and know how to use it! |
#14
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Thomas Flores" wrote in
: It could be turned into a jobs program. Think of all those good paying jobs for enforcement personnel and how good it would be for the economy. Do we have enough foreign government employees to cover all the boatramps?? |
#15
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Dave" wrote in message
... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#16
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Capt. JG" wrote
It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long |
#17
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long Law abiding citizens have nothing to fear. Can I see your free speech permit? |
#18
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Roger Long" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. You've hit the nail on the head. That is exactly where we are headed. A police state is one where anyone in a uniform can pull you in on a whim any time they feel like it. That can't be done here because we have this thing called a constitution. However, if you can get the public to accept all sorts of laws on the "Oh, they'll never bother enforcing that." basis, then the police can invoke them any time. Boaters are gradually making some progress in the anchoring battle that has been going on in Florida for years. What do you think the towns and police will do when they figure out that they have these EPA permit regulations to work with? 0400 There is the clomping of heavy boots on your deck. "It's been reported that a water discharge was seen coming from your boat. We're here to inspect your dish detergent and piping system. Ah, we see that you are using Joy instead of the best available non-phosphate brand. You've been anchored here two weeks. Your fine will be $384,000. Your EPA permit is now revoked and we are towing your boat to the nearest shipyard to be removed from the water." Nobody is going to enforce this stuff because they give a **** about water quality. It will be used like a lot of laws to pursue other agendas. It won't happen often and it won't be a significant risk to any individual boater, probably less than the hazards we routinely accept. But, doesn't it disturb people here to see this nation which is creating so much death and suffering in the name of "freedom" going down this path? This EPA stuff is just one example. -- Roger Long I think we're a ways off from this, but it's a slippery slope. People tend to think, for example, that scum like terrorists should be hanged immediately or held indefinitely without a trial (e.g., gitmo), but this is the precipice of a very slippery slope that may start with good intentions and ends with jackboots. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#19
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
In article lutions,
"Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. 'Not knowing the laws is no excuse for violating them' LOL -- Molesworth |
#20
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Proposed Discharge Permits
"Molesworth" wrote in message
... In article lutions, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Dave" wrote in message ... On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:32:09 -0700, "claus" said: New EPA water permit regulations are on the horizon. Some boaters fear this could cause them to sink or simply take their boats out of the water altogether. BoatUS is playing it for all the PR it's worth, but anyone with modest ability to read and think should realize that what the EPA has done by providing "automatic" and free licenses is to abolish any requirement for a license for vessels under 79 feet. It's an interesting situation, and unfortunately it reminds me of what the Chinese gov't does. It has lots of laws on the books that it doesn't generally enforce, but they're there, and when they like, they can enforce them. 'Not knowing the laws is no excuse for violating them' LOL -- Molesworth Almost funny, but not quite... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ahoy Scotty- road permits | ASA | |||
EU cruising permits? | Cruising | |||
New Permits will allow Longlining in Protected Areas | General | |||
Discharge | ASA | |||
NY State Parks Kayak Permits | Touring |