Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:09:26 -0400, jeff wrote:
JimC would like to write this off as just a drunk operator incident, but frankly, it happened so quickly and was so unexpected, that it might have happened even if he was sober. My issue is that 8 adults is not normally gross overloading on a 26 foot boat, and goosing the throttle on a typical sailboat does not instantly create a dangerous situation. Given that Macs are often sold to novices, the description of this event should be required reading by all Mac owners. http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html ========================================= Tragic, too many people plus a design weakness. Bayliner had a similar issue back in the 80s with some of their small flybridge cruisers. With too much weight on the flybridge they would flop over and capsize in a hard turn. Problem was solved with a warning sticker. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:09:26 -0400, jeff wrote: JimC would like to write this off as just a drunk operator incident, but frankly, it happened so quickly and was so unexpected, that it might have happened even if he was sober. My issue is that 8 adults is not normally gross overloading on a 26 foot boat, and goosing the throttle on a typical sailboat does not instantly create a dangerous situation. Given that Macs are often sold to novices, the description of this event should be required reading by all Mac owners. http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html ========================================= Tragic, too many people plus a design weakness. Bayliner had a similar issue back in the 80s with some of their small flybridge cruisers. With too much weight on the flybridge they would flop over and capsize in a hard turn. Problem was solved with a warning sticker. Problem solved with a warning sticker!!! That is just the builder covering his backside as best he can. The builders of the capsized Mac said they put a sticker on when it was built but the evidence indicated that it was not there at the time of the accident. Eight adults on the deck of what was in effect a large unballasted dinghy is a recipe for disaster because it constitutes overloading anyway and the weight of all on deck was so high up that if the boat heels even in a gentle turn it is going right over if there is no ballast in the keel to restrain it.. There is no mystery at all about the cause of the tragedy but it does indicate that this is not a boat that anyone without training about the water ballast and the max no of passengers can just drive away safely |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Edgar wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:09:26 -0400, jeff wrote: JimC would like to write this off as just a drunk operator incident, but frankly, it happened so quickly and was so unexpected, that it might have happened even if he was sober. My issue is that 8 adults is not normally gross overloading on a 26 foot boat, and goosing the throttle on a typical sailboat does not instantly create a dangerous situation. Given that Macs are often sold to novices, the description of this event should be required reading by all Mac owners. http://www.ne-ts.com/ar/ar-407capsize.html ========================================= Tragic, too many people plus a design weakness. Bayliner had a similar issue back in the 80s with some of their small flybridge cruisers. With too much weight on the flybridge they would flop over and capsize in a hard turn. Problem was solved with a warning sticker. Problem solved with a warning sticker!!! That is just the builder covering his backside as best he can. The builders of the capsized Mac said they put a sticker on when it was built but the evidence indicated that it was not there at the time of the accident. Eight adults on the deck of what was in effect a large unballasted dinghy is a recipe for disaster because it constitutes overloading anyway and the weight of all on deck was so high up that if the boat heels even in a gentle turn it is going right over if there is no ballast in the keel to restrain it.. There is no mystery at all about the cause of the tragedy but it does indicate that this is not a boat that anyone without training about the water ballast and the max no of passengers can just drive away safely The skipper was drunk, the boat was severely overloaded and top heavy, the skipper had borrowed the boat from the owner and was apparently unfamiliar with it, and the owner was apparently not there to check things out. Most critically, the drunk skipper was motoring the boat with the ballast tank empty. Therefore, once the boat started to roll (apparently when he turned, under power, with the heavy load on deck), the boat had little righting force and rolled over. ANYONE WHO HAS SAILED OR MOTORED a water-ballasted boat should know that such boats aren't self-righting without the water ballast and are dangerous, particularly if you are going out with the boat overloaded and while you and several of the guests are drunk. Also, the two casualties were small infants who had been left in the cabin while the "adults" were drinking up on deck. I also think the owner had a responsibility to check the boat (and the skipper) before the boat went out. In any event, the case was vigorously prosecuted, but the plaintiffs lost. They tried to make the case that the boat was inherently unsafe, but the judge didn't buy it. As to how this relates to our present discussion, I really doubt than any even half-way rational skipper would consider taking a Mac offshore under such conditions (with the boat overloaded, with several adults standing on the deck, with the skipper and half the guests drunk, and with the ballast tank empty). It's an anomaly that doesn't really relate to the present discussion. Jim |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimC" wrote in message
... I really doubt than any even half-way rational skipper would consider taking a Mac offshore under such conditions (with the boat overloaded, with several adults standing on the deck, with the skipper and half the guests drunk, and with the ballast tank empty). It's an anomaly that doesn't really relate to the present discussion. Such conditions? Calm waters? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Capt. JG wrote: "JimC" wrote in message ... I really doubt than any even half-way rational skipper would consider taking a Mac offshore under such conditions (with the boat overloaded, with several adults standing on the deck, with the skipper and half the guests drunk, and with the ballast tank empty). It's an anomaly that doesn't really relate to the present discussion. Such conditions? Calm waters? You are again evading the substance of my post, Ganz. "Calm waters" was only one factor out of a number of more critical ones, including: drunk skipper, negligent owner, drunk guests, ignorant skipper who wasn't familiar with the boat, empty ballast tank (apparently not checked by either the skipper or the owner), motoring at night under varying lighting (fireworks) boat overloaded, boat top heavy with several drunk adults standing on the deck, some apparently holding on to the mast, and infants left in the cabin. Regarding the "calm waters" issue, apparently the skipper was trying to maneuver around other boats also in the area to watch the fireworks. In any event, he turned the boat at excessive speed under the conditions. Ganz, are you intentionally or maliciously distorting the points made in my notes, or are you just stupid? Jim |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimC wrote:
Ganz, are you intentionally or maliciously distorting the points made in my notes, or are you just stupid? Jim Hold up, Jim. You seem to be expecting rational behavior and fair treatment from the creatures inhabiting this list. They, on the other hand, are having fun making sport of you via your boat. Drop it and go on and enjoy sailing. Maybe the first cartoon here will help... http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb/proof.htm Richard -- (remove the X to email) Now just why the HELL do I have to press 1 for English? John Wayne |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() cavelamb himself wrote: JimC wrote: Ganz, are you intentionally or maliciously distorting the points made in my notes, or are you just stupid? Jim Hold up, Jim. You seem to be expecting rational behavior and fair treatment from the creatures inhabiting this list. They, on the other hand, are having fun making sport of you via your boat. Drop it and go on and enjoy sailing. Maybe the first cartoon here will help... http://www.home.earthlink.net/~cavelamb/proof.htm Richard Richard, yours is one of the few rational responses posted so far in this string. As you may have noted, I don't spend a lot of time in discussions of the Macs on alt.sailing.asa. However, I sometimes think that the MacBashers have been getting something of a free ride. - Few Mac owners seem to be willing to stick up for their boats on this ng, and it doesn't seem right that a boat as popular, versatile, and fun to sail as the Mac26 shouldn't be supported by at least some of their owners. Also, I sense that it's something of a shock to some of the MacBashers when they get their asses kicked. If I didn't enjoy it, I wouldn't continue doing it. Jim |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JimC" wrote in message
.. . Capt. JG wrote: "JimC" wrote in message ... I really doubt than any even half-way rational skipper would consider taking a Mac offshore under such conditions (with the boat overloaded, with several adults standing on the deck, with the skipper and half the guests drunk, and with the ballast tank empty). It's an anomaly that doesn't really relate to the present discussion. Such conditions? Calm waters? You are again evading the substance of my post, Ganz. "Calm waters" was only one factor out of a number of more critical ones, including: drunk skipper, negligent owner, drunk guests, ignorant skipper who wasn't familiar with the boat, empty ballast tank (apparently not checked by either the skipper or the owner), motoring at night under varying lighting (fireworks) boat overloaded, boat top heavy with several drunk adults standing on the deck, some apparently holding on to the mast, and infants left in the cabin. Regarding the "calm waters" issue, apparently the skipper was trying to maneuver around other boats also in the area to watch the fireworks. In any event, he turned the boat at excessive speed under the conditions. Ganz, are you intentionally or maliciously distorting the points made in my notes, or are you just stupid? Jim I must be stupid to believe you take yourself so seriously. You're the best troll ever!! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
I have decided to become.......... | General | |||
Decided on Dry Tortugas | Cruising | |||
Decided on Dry Tortugas | General | |||
Decided on Dry Tortugas | General |