Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: By the way, instead of saying "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil." I should have said "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out *prematurely" due to dirty lubricating oil." True. I was just using the pump to pump comparison because those are the first things each oil sees (not counting the diaphragm pump on most diesels) as they get to the engine. Perhaps not the best comparison. But I still believe my point is valid. That fuel oil needs to be filtered and kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running well. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. I can just see the looks on the crews faces as you say, "pray for rough weather, I need to clean my fuel". :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. I can just see the looks on the crews faces as you say, "pray for rough weather, I need to clean my fuel". :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill Invalid statement. Really? Without foundation. How so? Are you saying a diesel will run a long time with dirty fuel? No, I said that a diesel will run a long time with dirty oil. In one case you are talking about lubrication oil, in the other your are talking about fuel. Correct. But that does that make those statements "invalid"? Yes. A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Of course it will. But that has no relation to how long it will run with dirty or poorly filtered fuel. Other than to back up just what I was saying, that lubricating oil does not need to be filtered as well as fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running. Absolutely. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill Invalid statement. Really? Without foundation. How so? Are you saying a diesel will run a long time with dirty fuel? No, I said that a diesel will run a long time with dirty oil. In one case you are talking about lubrication oil, in the other your are talking about fuel. Correct. But that does that make those statements "invalid"? Yes. A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Of course it will. But that has no relation to how long it will run with dirty or poorly filtered fuel. Other than to back up just what I was saying, that lubricating oil does not need to be filtered as well as fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running. Absolutely. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" If it is away from the pickup, then it isn't entering into the problem. If things get stirred up then the polishing system will do its job better. Of course. But in the context of "bubbling" the fuel to "polish" it, it doesn't do much good. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" If it is away from the pickup, then it isn't entering into the problem. If things get stirred up then the polishing system will do its job better. Of course. But in the context of "bubbling" the fuel to "polish" it, it doesn't do much good. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: By the way, instead of saying "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil." I should have said "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out *prematurely" due to dirty lubricating oil." True. I was just using the pump to pump comparison because those are the first things each oil sees (not counting the diaphragm pump on most diesels) as they get to the engine. Perhaps not the best comparison. But I still believe my point is valid. That fuel oil needs to be filtered and kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running well. Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: By the way, instead of saying "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil." I should have said "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out *prematurely" due to dirty lubricating oil." True. I was just using the pump to pump comparison because those are the first things each oil sees (not counting the diaphragm pump on most diesels) as they get to the engine. Perhaps not the best comparison. But I still believe my point is valid. That fuel oil needs to be filtered and kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running well. Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) No, we sailed to the point where we needed a tow to get into Lake Worth Inlet. Didn't seem prudent to try and sail through the inlet. And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? No. Not until after getting repairs at Rybovich. We have one now. If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? QED Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) No, we sailed to the point where we needed a tow to get into Lake Worth Inlet. Didn't seem prudent to try and sail through the inlet. And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? No. Not until after getting repairs at Rybovich. We have one now. If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? QED Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. And hence the crud as well. Yes, but only if the fuel is well shaken, not "bubbled" in one baffle. And that's the context that my answer was written in. I assumed that was understood. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. And hence the crud as well. Yes, but only if the fuel is well shaken, not "bubbled" in one baffle. And that's the context that my answer was written in. I assumed that was understood. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Whatever. You've lost sight of the outcome being strived for. Don't
need bad weather. Just a trip down the ICW will stir up the fuel tanks. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. I can just see the looks on the crews faces as you say, "pray for rough weather, I need to clean my fuel". :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Whatever. You've lost sight of the outcome being strived for. Don't
need bad weather. Just a trip down the ICW will stir up the fuel tanks. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. I can just see the looks on the crews faces as you say, "pray for rough weather, I need to clean my fuel". :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Steve,
Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Steve,
Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
Steve, Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. With the system I described below, what you can do is, while the engine is not running (there are long periods when it's off, right?) shut off the valve to the engine intake. Then you have your system that can recirculate fuel through the filtering system and clean the fuel in the tank without it going to the engine. Leave the pump on for a few days or until the filters clog, whichever comes first, before opening the valve to the engine. Then open the engine valve to run it and it'll get the freshest filtered fuel possible because it's drawing it right from the polishing system. Of course, the disadvantage of doing it this way is that if you don't install polishing system bypass valves, you have to run the walbro pump whenever you're running the engine. I've found that to be not all that much of a disadvantage and the advantage is that fuel is being polished whenever the engine is running. You can always wire it into the ignition switch with a double solenoid relay so that the pump can be controlled via the ignition switch or another switch with a 12 hour timer so you can set it and leave the boat and it'll turn off on it's own after running for 12 hours. There sre so many different ways you can plumb the thing. The more flexability you want, the more valves and piping you need. The disadvantage to making it too flexable is that it becomes too complex and prone to operator error as well as developing a vacuum leak somewhere. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) I know. I didn't use tabs though, just spaces. So if you cut'n'paste the schematic into a word processor and choose a fixed width font it'll look fine. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
Steve, Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. With the system I described below, what you can do is, while the engine is not running (there are long periods when it's off, right?) shut off the valve to the engine intake. Then you have your system that can recirculate fuel through the filtering system and clean the fuel in the tank without it going to the engine. Leave the pump on for a few days or until the filters clog, whichever comes first, before opening the valve to the engine. Then open the engine valve to run it and it'll get the freshest filtered fuel possible because it's drawing it right from the polishing system. Of course, the disadvantage of doing it this way is that if you don't install polishing system bypass valves, you have to run the walbro pump whenever you're running the engine. I've found that to be not all that much of a disadvantage and the advantage is that fuel is being polished whenever the engine is running. You can always wire it into the ignition switch with a double solenoid relay so that the pump can be controlled via the ignition switch or another switch with a 12 hour timer so you can set it and leave the boat and it'll turn off on it's own after running for 12 hours. There sre so many different ways you can plumb the thing. The more flexability you want, the more valves and piping you need. The disadvantage to making it too flexable is that it becomes too complex and prone to operator error as well as developing a vacuum leak somewhere. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) I know. I didn't use tabs though, just spaces. So if you cut'n'paste the schematic into a word processor and choose a fixed width font it'll look fine. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
|
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
|
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Good suggestions. I'll try and clean up the schematic and take a
closer look at it. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. With the system I described below, what you can do is, while the engine is not running (there are long periods when it's off, right?) shut off the valve to the engine intake. Then you have your system that can recirculate fuel through the filtering system and clean the fuel in the tank without it going to the engine. Leave the pump on for a few days or until the filters clog, whichever comes first, before opening the valve to the engine. Then open the engine valve to run it and it'll get the freshest filtered fuel possible because it's drawing it right from the polishing system. Of course, the disadvantage of doing it this way is that if you don't install polishing system bypass valves, you have to run the walbro pump whenever you're running the engine. I've found that to be not all that much of a disadvantage and the advantage is that fuel is being polished whenever the engine is running. You can always wire it into the ignition switch with a double solenoid relay so that the pump can be controlled via the ignition switch or another switch with a 12 hour timer so you can set it and leave the boat and it'll turn off on it's own after running for 12 hours. There sre so many different ways you can plumb the thing. The more flexability you want, the more valves and piping you need. The disadvantage to making it too flexable is that it becomes too complex and prone to operator error as well as developing a vacuum leak somewhere. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) I know. I didn't use tabs though, just spaces. So if you cut'n'paste the schematic into a word processor and choose a fixed width font it'll look fine. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Good suggestions. I'll try and clean up the schematic and take a
closer look at it. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 23:44:05 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, Just a quick reply since I'm about ready to hit the sack. I think you are saying that the polishing system should be something that can be switched inline on the way to the engine. That amounts to just more pre-engine filtering. What I want is a system that can recirculate fuel independent of the engine system. From what I gather, recirculating fuel through a filtering system will result in clean fuel so that the engine system will not be stressed (lift pump). Also, much crud is built up while just sitting in the slip or on the hard over the winter. Better to clean it up prior to offering it up to the engine than hitting the engine filters all at once. With the system I described below, what you can do is, while the engine is not running (there are long periods when it's off, right?) shut off the valve to the engine intake. Then you have your system that can recirculate fuel through the filtering system and clean the fuel in the tank without it going to the engine. Leave the pump on for a few days or until the filters clog, whichever comes first, before opening the valve to the engine. Then open the engine valve to run it and it'll get the freshest filtered fuel possible because it's drawing it right from the polishing system. Of course, the disadvantage of doing it this way is that if you don't install polishing system bypass valves, you have to run the walbro pump whenever you're running the engine. I've found that to be not all that much of a disadvantage and the advantage is that fuel is being polished whenever the engine is running. You can always wire it into the ignition switch with a double solenoid relay so that the pump can be controlled via the ignition switch or another switch with a 12 hour timer so you can set it and leave the boat and it'll turn off on it's own after running for 12 hours. There sre so many different ways you can plumb the thing. The more flexability you want, the more valves and piping you need. The disadvantage to making it too flexable is that it becomes too complex and prone to operator error as well as developing a vacuum leak somewhere. Your ACSII schematic came across totally skewed. That is a problem with proportional fonts and TABs :) I know. I didn't use tabs though, just spaces. So if you cut'n'paste the schematic into a word processor and choose a fixed width font it'll look fine. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Whatever. It was a joke Doug. Note the :-) You've lost sight of the outcome being strived for. Hardly. Don't need bad weather. Just a trip down the ICW will stir up the fuel tanks. If you say so. But I would doubt it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Whatever. It was a joke Doug. Note the :-) You've lost sight of the outcome being strived for. Hardly. Don't need bad weather. Just a trip down the ICW will stir up the fuel tanks. If you say so. But I would doubt it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: This is why I like the way my system is plumbed, i.e., the engine draws from the polishing system. That way, you don't have to worry about stirring up the fuel to polish it. If the engine is running and you're in rough weather, it's being filtered before going to the engine. If you have it in a separate loop and you run into rough weather that stirs up the tank, you can introduce dirt from the tank wall that wasn't dislodged while you were polishing and it'll get to the engine. You don't have to worry about bubbling or stirring it up if it's always being filtered before getting to the engine. And you can run the system with the engine off also to get a multiple pass circulation just like if it was in a separate loop. Sounds good to me. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: This is why I like the way my system is plumbed, i.e., the engine draws from the polishing system. That way, you don't have to worry about stirring up the fuel to polish it. If the engine is running and you're in rough weather, it's being filtered before going to the engine. If you have it in a separate loop and you run into rough weather that stirs up the tank, you can introduce dirt from the tank wall that wasn't dislodged while you were polishing and it'll get to the engine. You don't have to worry about bubbling or stirring it up if it's always being filtered before getting to the engine. And you can run the system with the engine off also to get a multiple pass circulation just like if it was in a separate loop. Sounds good to me. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. It's an obvious miss statement. I of course meant to write: "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than lubricating oil..." I'm not drinking Doug. But based on some of your replys I have had my doubts about you. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. It's an obvious miss statement. I of course meant to write: "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than lubricating oil..." I'm not drinking Doug. But based on some of your replys I have had my doubts about you. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
It never fails in a thread that lasts this long that the personal insults
start appearing. You haven't offered all that much useful anyway so won't miss the lack of any further contributions from you. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. It's an obvious miss statement. I of course meant to write: "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than lubricating oil..." I'm not drinking Doug. But based on some of your replys I have had my doubts about you. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
It never fails in a thread that lasts this long that the personal insults
start appearing. You haven't offered all that much useful anyway so won't miss the lack of any further contributions from you. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Have another beer. Please clarify that "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than fuel oil..."? You lost me. It's an obvious miss statement. I of course meant to write: "...fuel oil needs to be kept clean to a higher degree than lubricating oil..." I'm not drinking Doug. But based on some of your replys I have had my doubts about you. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) No, we sailed to the point where we needed a tow to get into Lake Worth Inlet. Didn't seem prudent to try and sail through the inlet. Makes sense. And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? No. Not until after getting repairs at Rybovich. We have one now. Ok, I wasn't sure of the time line. If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? QED Got it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Did your sails fail too? :-) No, we sailed to the point where we needed a tow to get into Lake Worth Inlet. Didn't seem prudent to try and sail through the inlet. Makes sense. And didn't you say you had electric priming pumps? No. Not until after getting repairs at Rybovich. We have one now. Ok, I wasn't sure of the time line. If so, why did you not use those to run the engine? QED Got it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" It never fails in a thread that lasts this long that the personal insults start appearing. You haven't offered all that much useful anyway so won't miss the lack of any further contributions from you. That's an interesting take, considering you're the one who first implied that I had been drinking while responding to you. It seems you can't take a joke. Not to mention your poor reading in context skills. As to useful information put forth, same to you. :-) Good luck with your "polishing" system. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" It never fails in a thread that lasts this long that the personal insults start appearing. You haven't offered all that much useful anyway so won't miss the lack of any further contributions from you. That's an interesting take, considering you're the one who first implied that I had been drinking while responding to you. It seems you can't take a joke. Not to mention your poor reading in context skills. As to useful information put forth, same to you. :-) Good luck with your "polishing" system. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Correct. But that does that make those statements "invalid"? Yes. Expound please. Capt. Bill |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com