Fuel transfer/polishing pump
In article , Keith
wrote: What's untrue? That a racor element will clog up very fast if you have dirty fuel? ***** Not in comparison to a cylindrical paper roll. Or do you mean that the efficiency of a toilt paper roll is soooooo low that it captures virtually nothing except very large visible particles that is continues to unload at the same rate that it captures.... and all the while buirning up amperage to run the pump to overcome the high CLEAN differential pressure required. If a filter plugs, then it did its job !!!!!!!!!! Its not the job of a filter to pass particulate at its designated retention rating. Whats the retention rating of toilet paper ??????? .... why doesnt it plug up when hit with a slug of particles???? Have any data on the residual particle level in a tank after X passes through the 'filter'. Actually the "surface area" would be much greater in a paper towel, ***** How is the surface of a pleated filter less than the surface of a cylinder?. Doesnt make sense. A typical pleated 2.5" dia. X 10" filter has a surface area of 5 to 6 sq. ft. A toilet paper roll of 4.5" dia X 4" long has a surface of 0.4 square ft. Thats 12 to 15 times MORE surface area for the pleated for a normal recirc. installation. since you are filtering through from one end to the other, while the racor only filters through the pleated surface. By the way, what do you mean by "de-polarize"? ***** Electropolization of the long chain agglomerated macro-molecules ..... same thing that probably allows a woman to get pregnenat once a month. ... Are you saying that slime is magnetic? *****NO Or that they are polar molecules, like water? ***** Yes they can be Maybe that's how those algae-x things work! Yes....But, I have NO idea (nor interest) about algae-x ... if it works or not :-) Can you quote the specs for all those test methods you mentioned for a Racor... any racor/filter combination? Pick one. Any 'reliable' filter manufactuerer uses (and can document compliance to) the following data to compare filters. Those that cant or wont are usually 'shysters' or are totally ignorant of filtration and offer ratings that are ENTIRELY ARBITRARY (a kind word for: liars). The test is a universal standardized test adopted ASTM. The test curently used was developed about 1960 for comparisons of filtration efficiency by the Oklahoma State University - called the OSU F2 test-stand (and defines a standardized test contaminent to establish equal comparisons between filtration media) - its THE industry standard for coarse filtration. A Racor type or other resinated pleated paper will usually test out to a 'beta value' (log of upstream challenge to downstream challenge between a beta value of 1000 - meaning about 95-98% weight efficiency. An unresinated paper upon increasing differential pressure will ***unload*** at approximately a beta value of 50 (less than ~25% efficiency). I am deeply involved in filtration engineering and do consulting work that includes depth filters made of cellulose (with binding resins). A cellulosic filter media needs a binder for strength and sometimes the addition of Perlite to enhance wet-strength .... or it simply compresses to stop flow OR falls apart in the presence of water and other liquids. Commercial/Industrial depth filters for fuel oil also sometimes include diatomaceous earth to enhance the retention and service life .... plus the addition of elemental starches for the absorbtion of free water (for 'trimming' /absorbtion of water emulsion). Without a graded pore density a cellulosic filter captures virutally ALL the particles on the surface (cylinder). A paper made into toilet paper or paper towels is made from very coarse fiber stock - poor permeability vs. flow AND contains lots of small chopped fibers that they themselves are free to migrate out of the paper matrix (particles themselves). That a toilet paper filter works (at all) depends on LOW differential pressure (or the cellulose compresses into a 'sludge') but does take into account statistical particle reduction of multiple pass filtration of recirculation mode. Its pretty false economy to have overpriced, poorly performing/designed housings and then put in a poorly performing 'toilet paper' 'filter' that has NO certifiable retention rating, is made from paper that is variable in density, is made from paper that is specifically MADE TO DIGEST and FALL APART in the presence of water/liquids. Fibers for toilet paper and paper towel rolls are NOT arranged into a graded pore density (the retention of the upsteam surface is larger than the downstream or exit portion of the depth of media) such as a typical TRUE depth filter': which means grade pore density....pores/cpature sites get smaller as one goes deeper into the matrix. For a fixed pre density (such a roll of toilet paper) what is not captured on the surface can migrate all-the-way-through the 'filter. Your implication of successive potential sucessive capture sites is only for VERY LARGE particles as with smaller and smaller size particles the removal mechanism of inertial impaction capture decrease logrithmically. A roll of toilet paper will wrinkle-up into a 'little knot' when high differential pressures are applied while UNLOADING most of the debris that it originally captured. This 'technology' came out the "oil-patch" in the 1920s, has been replaced by fixed pore, graded pore density depth pads or cartridges (in the 1970s). A pleated resin bound filter cartridge uses a vastly smaller filter housing. A pleated paper. Typical true depth filtration in cartridge form requires housings that are 5-10 times the size (cost) of a pleated configuration -------- to do the same exact job. The pleated resinated paper filter has VASTLY less resistance to flow, has a defined retention rating, will allow the pump to deliver more volumetric flow rate and at less amperage draw, requires smaller housing (on an equal flow basis) @ first /installation cost, has documented retention, flux. .... because of these advantages will reduce the resident particles in a tank to nearly undetectable limits ****exponentially faster**** than a filter that inherently DOES NOT FLOW and has poor retention ability, .... I guess an advantage is that the amperage draw of such a toilet paper system can help heat the interior of a boat in winter! Please answer the following: What is the collapse pressure of a toilet paper roll? What is the particle retention rating on either an absolute basis or 'nominal' rating? How about a beta value? or do you just depends on 'dumb luck'. What is the loss of efficiency due to the 'knife edge seals? What is the percent of bypass at 30uM at the knife edge? 20uM, 10uM, 2uM What is the wet strength rating? What is the recommended flow rate of a toilet paper roll? How do you 'size' a toilet paper filter to operate at the low motive pressure of a fuel system? Is it ....."Just BUY one and see if it works" .... hardly! Tell me which toilet paper mill makes a 'technical grade' of paper? Tell again that a rolled paper filter is more efficient than a 'cartridge'. ... include the PRICE of the housing in your evaluation/reply. Whats the 'dirt capacity' of a to9ilet paper roll? A 2.5" dia X 10" pleated typically has about 150 grams capacity..... an equivalent cartridge true depth filter (in cartridge format) will have about 20-25 grams capacity. ;-) |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you
periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Fuel Oil ages and with time polymerizes into particulate which adhere to the tank walls only to break loose when you dont want it to. Bacterial infect the oil, use the iron components and oil as nutrients and then form slimes that adhere to the tank walls. When these bacteria die the cellular components make a thick soup. All these particles are 'grown' in the tank. The more the particles the more will form. Occasional tank cleaning will keep the particulate load low and reduce the need for filters. The real answer is to get in and inspect & clean the tank on a routine basis. Steam works best and you can usually get into most of the hidden places even behind baffles, etc. If you cant get steam, then a long handled brush and elbow grease will be of benefit. Most fuel in the USA is quite clean. If you buy 'fresh' fuel from a high volume distributor you will get very little 'old' oil. Dont 'store' lots of fuel in your tankage, buy what you need, and dont top off the tank every time you need it. Find a way to drain the water from the tank to retard bacteria growth. Then ..... if you have a clean tank, fresh fuel .... the challenge to the filters will be VERY minimal. If anyone wants to see a schematic of my filtration system (with independent recirc. system and emergency 'day' tank) send me an eMail at remove the NOSPAM to send. My recirc. system does virtually all the work, its so efficient that I'm thinking about removing the complicated 'Racor Train' for a single small Racor and a 'guard' filter. My 'day' tank will permit 2+ hours of running without even changing a fully plugged filter - If I cant solve a fuel problem in 2 hours, I shouldnt be sailing. My fuel system is a pressure sytem instead of the typical vacuum system to enhance the filter lifetime. I use gauges to monitor filter performance .... and so far I havent had ANY challenge to the Racors in almost 5 years. I clean out the tankage every two years. When I start travellilng to the 'third world', I add a Baja filter to the delivery pipe to keep out all the rocks stick and feathers. Hope this helps. :-) In article , LaBomba182 wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" One poster mentioned that Raycor type filters don;t make good polishing filters because they are surface filters and clog up quickly. Well, they would be wrong. Like Glenn said, you need to use the right size filter for the job. The paper towel and toilet paper types are better for polishing. Yeah no doubt. Things designed to wipe your kitchen counter and wipe your ass will beat a Racor for filtering fuel everytime. Next you'll be adding an Algea-X into the mix. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you
periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Fuel Oil ages and with time polymerizes into particulate which adhere to the tank walls only to break loose when you dont want it to. Bacterial infect the oil, use the iron components and oil as nutrients and then form slimes that adhere to the tank walls. When these bacteria die the cellular components make a thick soup. All these particles are 'grown' in the tank. The more the particles the more will form. Occasional tank cleaning will keep the particulate load low and reduce the need for filters. The real answer is to get in and inspect & clean the tank on a routine basis. Steam works best and you can usually get into most of the hidden places even behind baffles, etc. If you cant get steam, then a long handled brush and elbow grease will be of benefit. Most fuel in the USA is quite clean. If you buy 'fresh' fuel from a high volume distributor you will get very little 'old' oil. Dont 'store' lots of fuel in your tankage, buy what you need, and dont top off the tank every time you need it. Find a way to drain the water from the tank to retard bacteria growth. Then ..... if you have a clean tank, fresh fuel .... the challenge to the filters will be VERY minimal. If anyone wants to see a schematic of my filtration system (with independent recirc. system and emergency 'day' tank) send me an eMail at remove the NOSPAM to send. My recirc. system does virtually all the work, its so efficient that I'm thinking about removing the complicated 'Racor Train' for a single small Racor and a 'guard' filter. My 'day' tank will permit 2+ hours of running without even changing a fully plugged filter - If I cant solve a fuel problem in 2 hours, I shouldnt be sailing. My fuel system is a pressure sytem instead of the typical vacuum system to enhance the filter lifetime. I use gauges to monitor filter performance .... and so far I havent had ANY challenge to the Racors in almost 5 years. I clean out the tankage every two years. When I start travellilng to the 'third world', I add a Baja filter to the delivery pipe to keep out all the rocks stick and feathers. Hope this helps. :-) In article , LaBomba182 wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" One poster mentioned that Raycor type filters don;t make good polishing filters because they are surface filters and clog up quickly. Well, they would be wrong. Like Glenn said, you need to use the right size filter for the job. The paper towel and toilet paper types are better for polishing. Yeah no doubt. Things designed to wipe your kitchen counter and wipe your ass will beat a Racor for filtering fuel everytime. Next you'll be adding an Algea-X into the mix. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Rich,
I wish that you would consider the emperical evidence rather than just spouting theory, specs and standard tests. Have you ever used a TP filter? Although theoretically they may not work because the nature of the filter element has no quality control and other characteristics, the bottom line is they do work. Why not look into understanding why they do work rather than just, poo-pooing those that do siting theory that is not supported by reallity. I understand the bumble bee can't fly but I got stung by one while filtering questionable fuel into my uncleanable tanks. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Inspecting the tank periodically in my case is very impractical. Inspection ports are in the side and are bolted and bedded into place. Cleaning the tank periodically cost $600 a pop. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Good theory. Not the reallity though. Bad fuel is a fact of life. Fuel Oil ages and with time polymerizes into particulate which adhere to the tank walls only to break loose when you dont want it to. Bacterial infect the oil, use the iron components and oil as nutrients and then form slimes that adhere to the tank walls. When these bacteria die the cellular components make a thick soup. All these particles are 'grown' in the tank. The more the particles the more will form. Occasional tank cleaning will keep the particulate load low and reduce the need for filters. And so will polishing. Tank cleaning is high effort and expense. Running a polishing system and changing the filters is less effort and lower cost. The real answer is to get in and inspect & clean the tank on a routine basis. Steam works best and you can usually get into most of the hidden places even behind baffles, etc. If you cant get steam, then a long handled brush and elbow grease will be of benefit. I just haven;t been able to find an outfit that has steam cleaning equipment in the out islands. Doing it myself using elbow grease isn't practical even if I could reach the whole tank using a long handled brush. When I'm out on the hook, what do I do with the cruddy fuel. None of the places I have visited has any practical means of disposing of bad fuel. Most fuel in the USA is quite clean. Sooooooooo WRONG. Most of the bad fuel I got came from the US along the ICW. If you buy 'fresh' fuel from a high volume distributor you will get very little 'old' oil. In the islands and along the ICW you buy fuel where you can find it. Dont 'store' lots of fuel in your tankage, buy what you need, and dont top off the tank every time you need it. I've always been taught that partially filled tanks encourage condensation and topping off is the best way to prevent it. My tanks are what they are (95 gal ea). I burn 1 GPH so 'storing' fuel is in effect a unavoidable situation. Find a way to drain the water from the tank to retard bacteria growth. I have a drain cock at the lowest point in each tank. I drain them periodically. Water has never been a real problem. Then ..... if you have a clean tank, fresh fuel .... the challenge to the filters will be VERY minimal. NO KIDDING! But I am forced to live in the real world! If anyone wants to see a schematic of my filtration system (with independent recirc. system and emergency 'day' tank) send me an eMail at remove the NOSPAM to send. Thanks, Rick! I'll send an email. My recirc. system does virtually all the work, its so efficient that I'm thinking about removing the complicated 'Racor Train' for a single small Racor and a 'guard' filter. My 'day' tank will permit 2+ hours of running without even changing a fully plugged filter But why do you neeed all this stuff since you clean your tanks regularly and only buy clean fuel from a high volume distributor? Did I miss something? - If I cant solve a fuel problem in 2 hours, I shouldnt be sailing. At least you didn't say that if the rest of us are so ungifted we shouldn't be sailing. My fuel system is a pressure sytem instead of the typical vacuum system to enhance the filter lifetime. Good idea from what I have been told. Although I was told that Raycors are intended to be on the suction side. Is that wrong? I use gauges to monitor filter performance .... So have all the polishing systems I have seen. and so far I havent had ANY challenge to the Racors in almost 5 years. I clean out the tankage every two years. Your tanks must be more amenable to cleaning than mine. I wish I had the luxury. When I start travellilng to the 'third world', I add a Baja filter to the delivery pipe to keep out all the rocks stick and feathers. Of course. Hope this helps. :-) In article , LaBomba182 wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" One poster mentioned that Raycor type filters don;t make good polishing filters because they are surface filters and clog up quickly. Well, they would be wrong. Like Glenn said, you need to use the right size filter for the job. The paper towel and toilet paper types are better for polishing. Yeah no doubt. Things designed to wipe your kitchen counter and wipe your ass will beat a Racor for filtering fuel everytime. Next you'll be adding an Algea-X into the mix. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Rich,
I wish that you would consider the emperical evidence rather than just spouting theory, specs and standard tests. Have you ever used a TP filter? Although theoretically they may not work because the nature of the filter element has no quality control and other characteristics, the bottom line is they do work. Why not look into understanding why they do work rather than just, poo-pooing those that do siting theory that is not supported by reallity. I understand the bumble bee can't fly but I got stung by one while filtering questionable fuel into my uncleanable tanks. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Inspecting the tank periodically in my case is very impractical. Inspection ports are in the side and are bolted and bedded into place. Cleaning the tank periodically cost $600 a pop. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Good theory. Not the reallity though. Bad fuel is a fact of life. Fuel Oil ages and with time polymerizes into particulate which adhere to the tank walls only to break loose when you dont want it to. Bacterial infect the oil, use the iron components and oil as nutrients and then form slimes that adhere to the tank walls. When these bacteria die the cellular components make a thick soup. All these particles are 'grown' in the tank. The more the particles the more will form. Occasional tank cleaning will keep the particulate load low and reduce the need for filters. And so will polishing. Tank cleaning is high effort and expense. Running a polishing system and changing the filters is less effort and lower cost. The real answer is to get in and inspect & clean the tank on a routine basis. Steam works best and you can usually get into most of the hidden places even behind baffles, etc. If you cant get steam, then a long handled brush and elbow grease will be of benefit. I just haven;t been able to find an outfit that has steam cleaning equipment in the out islands. Doing it myself using elbow grease isn't practical even if I could reach the whole tank using a long handled brush. When I'm out on the hook, what do I do with the cruddy fuel. None of the places I have visited has any practical means of disposing of bad fuel. Most fuel in the USA is quite clean. Sooooooooo WRONG. Most of the bad fuel I got came from the US along the ICW. If you buy 'fresh' fuel from a high volume distributor you will get very little 'old' oil. In the islands and along the ICW you buy fuel where you can find it. Dont 'store' lots of fuel in your tankage, buy what you need, and dont top off the tank every time you need it. I've always been taught that partially filled tanks encourage condensation and topping off is the best way to prevent it. My tanks are what they are (95 gal ea). I burn 1 GPH so 'storing' fuel is in effect a unavoidable situation. Find a way to drain the water from the tank to retard bacteria growth. I have a drain cock at the lowest point in each tank. I drain them periodically. Water has never been a real problem. Then ..... if you have a clean tank, fresh fuel .... the challenge to the filters will be VERY minimal. NO KIDDING! But I am forced to live in the real world! If anyone wants to see a schematic of my filtration system (with independent recirc. system and emergency 'day' tank) send me an eMail at remove the NOSPAM to send. Thanks, Rick! I'll send an email. My recirc. system does virtually all the work, its so efficient that I'm thinking about removing the complicated 'Racor Train' for a single small Racor and a 'guard' filter. My 'day' tank will permit 2+ hours of running without even changing a fully plugged filter But why do you neeed all this stuff since you clean your tanks regularly and only buy clean fuel from a high volume distributor? Did I miss something? - If I cant solve a fuel problem in 2 hours, I shouldnt be sailing. At least you didn't say that if the rest of us are so ungifted we shouldn't be sailing. My fuel system is a pressure sytem instead of the typical vacuum system to enhance the filter lifetime. Good idea from what I have been told. Although I was told that Raycors are intended to be on the suction side. Is that wrong? I use gauges to monitor filter performance .... So have all the polishing systems I have seen. and so far I havent had ANY challenge to the Racors in almost 5 years. I clean out the tankage every two years. Your tanks must be more amenable to cleaning than mine. I wish I had the luxury. When I start travellilng to the 'third world', I add a Baja filter to the delivery pipe to keep out all the rocks stick and feathers. Of course. Hope this helps. :-) In article , LaBomba182 wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" One poster mentioned that Raycor type filters don;t make good polishing filters because they are surface filters and clog up quickly. Well, they would be wrong. Like Glenn said, you need to use the right size filter for the job. The paper towel and toilet paper types are better for polishing. Yeah no doubt. Things designed to wipe your kitchen counter and wipe your ass will beat a Racor for filtering fuel everytime. Next you'll be adding an Algea-X into the mix. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:32:11 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: In article , Keith wrote: What's untrue? That a racor element will clog up very fast if you have dirty fuel? ***** Not in comparison to a cylindrical paper roll. Or do you mean that the efficiency of a toilt paper roll is soooooo low that it captures virtually nothing except very large visible particles that is continues to unload at the same rate that it captures.... and all the while buirning up amperage to run the pump to overcome the high CLEAN differential pressure required. If a filter plugs, then it did its job !!!!!!!!!! Its not the job of a filter to pass particulate at its designated retention rating. Whats the retention rating of toilet paper ??????? .... why doesnt it plug up when hit with a slug of particles???? Have any data on the residual particle level in a tank after X passes through the 'filter'. The roll would plug up when hit with a slug of particles. But it takes much more particles to plug it up then with a pleated roll filter. BTW, I don't have any data on the residual particle level in a tank after X passes through the Racor filter either. That doesn't mean it's not working. Actually the "surface area" would be much greater in a paper towel, ***** How is the surface of a pleated filter less than the surface of a cylinder?. Doesnt make sense. A typical pleated 2.5" dia. X 10" filter has a surface area of 5 to 6 sq. ft. A toilet paper roll of 4.5" dia X 4" long has a surface of 0.4 square ft. Thats 12 to 15 times MORE surface area for the pleated for a normal recirc. installation. Now I see where you're confused. You're thinking that particles are trapped only at the surface of the roll exposed to the incoming fuel. Well that's just not true. Unlike the pleated filter, the roll can trap dirt several inches deep. That's why it can trap and hold so much more particles without plugging... it has a huge volume of material to hold the dirt and still let fuel pass. There's an exponential decay in the amout of dirt trapped vs. the depth into the filter you go. Both the pleated filter and the roll have their entire volume to trap dirt, not just at the surface. However, the pleated filter *has* to trap dirt near the surface or it won't get trapped at all since it's so thin. That's not the case with the roll. enhance the retention and service life .... plus the addition of elemental starches for the absorbtion of free water (for 'trimming' /absorbtion of water emulsion). Without a graded pore density a cellulosic filter captures virutally ALL the particles on the surface (cylinder). A paper made into toilet paper or paper towels is made That hasn't been the case in my situation. When I pull a roll out and try to peel it apart I can see visible black dirt at least 1/2" into the roll. And I'm sure there's more further up that I can't see. from very coarse fiber stock - poor permeability vs. flow AND contains lots of small chopped fibers that they themselves are free to migrate out of the paper matrix (particles themselves). That a toilet paper filter works (at all) depends on LOW differential pressure (or the cellulose compresses into a 'sludge') but does take Of course. But you can have a low differential pressure when you're talking about an element that's several inches to a foot thick. into account statistical particle reduction of multiple pass filtration of recirculation mode. Its pretty false economy to have overpriced, poorly performing/designed housings and then put in a poorly performing 'toilet paper' 'filter' that has NO certifiable retention rating, is made from paper that is variable in density, is made from paper that is The fact that it does not have a certifiable retention rating, etc., doesn't necessarily mean that all of the tests wouldn't represent good filtration. It only means that test results would not be repeatable. specifically MADE TO DIGEST and FALL APART in the presence of water/liquids. Fibers for toilet paper and paper towel rolls are NOT Water, yes. Oil, no. arranged into a graded pore density (the retention of the upsteam surface is larger than the downstream or exit portion of the depth of media) such as a typical TRUE depth filter': which means grade pore density....pores/cpature Again, just because it doesn't have a graded pore density doesn't mean it doesn't work. It only means it would work better if it had a graded pore density. sites get smaller as one goes deeper into the matrix. For a fixed pre density (such a roll of toilet paper) what is not captured on the surface can migrate all-the-way-through the 'filter. Your implication Of course it can. But so can it with a pleated edge filter. Again, with the paper rolls, the amount of dirt trapped vs. depth into the filter exhibits an exponential decline. If it had a graded pore density, the decline would be more linear. I agree that's a better situation. But again, that doesn't mean the paper rolls are not a good, cost effective solution to fuel polishing. of successive potential sucessive capture sites is only for VERY LARGE particles as with smaller and smaller size particles the removal mechanism of inertial impaction capture decrease logrithmically. A roll of toilet paper will wrinkle-up into a 'little knot' when high differential pressures are applied while UNLOADING most of the debris that it originally captured. This 'technology' came out the Which is why you monitor the filter with vacuum gauges and change it when the differential reaches more than an couple of pounds. The pleated resinated paper filter has VASTLY less resistance to flow, has a defined retention rating, will allow the pump to deliver more volumetric flow rate and at less amperage draw, requires smaller housing (on an equal flow basis) @ first /installation cost, has documented retention, flux. .... because of these advantages will reduce the resident particles in a tank to nearly undetectable limits ****exponentially faster**** than a filter that inherently DOES NOT FLOW and has poor retention ability, .... I guess an advantage is that the amperage draw of such a toilet paper system can help heat the interior of a boat in winter! Again, you're showing your inexperience with these fuel polishing systems. The walbro pump used with these systems doesn't draw more or heat up if it's flow is constricted. It uses magnetic sensing of the piston travel to activate the pump. So when the fuel flow rate slows down, so does the pumping without drawing any more power. In fact, the way it operates, it actually draws less power as the flow rate slows down. Yet another way (besides the vacuum gauges) to tell if your filters are getting clogged is to listen to the pump. You can hear the "ticking" get slower as the flow rate diminishes. Please answer the following: What is the collapse pressure of a toilet paper roll? What is the particle retention rating on either an absolute basis or 'nominal' rating? How about a beta value? or do you just depends on 'dumb luck'. What is the loss of efficiency due to the 'knife edge seals? What is the percent of bypass at 30uM at the knife edge? 20uM, 10uM, 2uM What is the wet strength rating? What is the recommended flow rate of a toilet paper roll? How do you 'size' a toilet paper filter to operate at the low motive pressure of a fuel system? Is it ....."Just BUY one and see if it works" .... hardly! Tell me which toilet paper mill makes a 'technical grade' of paper? Tell again that a rolled paper filter is more efficient than a 'cartridge'. ... include the PRICE of the housing in your evaluation/reply. Whats the 'dirt capacity' of a to9ilet paper roll? A 2.5" dia X 10" pleated typically has about 150 grams capacity..... an equivalent cartridge true depth filter (in cartridge format) will have about 20-25 grams capacity. I can't answer any of the below questions for my Racor either. But that doesn't mean I don't think it works. Now I have some questions for you. Please answer the following: Why do you think my 2 micron Racor is not pluged up after installing the TP filters and running for about 40 hours off of the same fuel that, before installing the TP filters, completely clogged 2 Racor elements in a row after 20 minutes each? Why, when changing the TP filters, do they come out hard and solid with no noticable disintegration, black on the bottom up to about 1/2" deep but nice and red at the top? While there are some black streaks on the side of the element that go up further then 1/2" (some are maybe 2 or 3 inches long) indicating some fluid going up the side between the canister and the roll, why have none of the black streakes ever reached the top of the roll, indicating that the fuel is still being filtered even as it passes up along the cartridge side? (I do compress the roll in fairly tightly when installing it and they are still slightly compressed against the side when I pull them out.) All I can suggest to you is "Just BUY one and see if it works" .... :) I think you'll find that if you have a dirty fuel problem, this will be one of the most cost effective solutions to fix it. Of course, if you don't already have a fuel problem that's bad enough to be clogging up Racors in only 20 minutes, you won't notice a benefit over just the Racor. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:32:11 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: In article , Keith wrote: What's untrue? That a racor element will clog up very fast if you have dirty fuel? ***** Not in comparison to a cylindrical paper roll. Or do you mean that the efficiency of a toilt paper roll is soooooo low that it captures virtually nothing except very large visible particles that is continues to unload at the same rate that it captures.... and all the while buirning up amperage to run the pump to overcome the high CLEAN differential pressure required. If a filter plugs, then it did its job !!!!!!!!!! Its not the job of a filter to pass particulate at its designated retention rating. Whats the retention rating of toilet paper ??????? .... why doesnt it plug up when hit with a slug of particles???? Have any data on the residual particle level in a tank after X passes through the 'filter'. The roll would plug up when hit with a slug of particles. But it takes much more particles to plug it up then with a pleated roll filter. BTW, I don't have any data on the residual particle level in a tank after X passes through the Racor filter either. That doesn't mean it's not working. Actually the "surface area" would be much greater in a paper towel, ***** How is the surface of a pleated filter less than the surface of a cylinder?. Doesnt make sense. A typical pleated 2.5" dia. X 10" filter has a surface area of 5 to 6 sq. ft. A toilet paper roll of 4.5" dia X 4" long has a surface of 0.4 square ft. Thats 12 to 15 times MORE surface area for the pleated for a normal recirc. installation. Now I see where you're confused. You're thinking that particles are trapped only at the surface of the roll exposed to the incoming fuel. Well that's just not true. Unlike the pleated filter, the roll can trap dirt several inches deep. That's why it can trap and hold so much more particles without plugging... it has a huge volume of material to hold the dirt and still let fuel pass. There's an exponential decay in the amout of dirt trapped vs. the depth into the filter you go. Both the pleated filter and the roll have their entire volume to trap dirt, not just at the surface. However, the pleated filter *has* to trap dirt near the surface or it won't get trapped at all since it's so thin. That's not the case with the roll. enhance the retention and service life .... plus the addition of elemental starches for the absorbtion of free water (for 'trimming' /absorbtion of water emulsion). Without a graded pore density a cellulosic filter captures virutally ALL the particles on the surface (cylinder). A paper made into toilet paper or paper towels is made That hasn't been the case in my situation. When I pull a roll out and try to peel it apart I can see visible black dirt at least 1/2" into the roll. And I'm sure there's more further up that I can't see. from very coarse fiber stock - poor permeability vs. flow AND contains lots of small chopped fibers that they themselves are free to migrate out of the paper matrix (particles themselves). That a toilet paper filter works (at all) depends on LOW differential pressure (or the cellulose compresses into a 'sludge') but does take Of course. But you can have a low differential pressure when you're talking about an element that's several inches to a foot thick. into account statistical particle reduction of multiple pass filtration of recirculation mode. Its pretty false economy to have overpriced, poorly performing/designed housings and then put in a poorly performing 'toilet paper' 'filter' that has NO certifiable retention rating, is made from paper that is variable in density, is made from paper that is The fact that it does not have a certifiable retention rating, etc., doesn't necessarily mean that all of the tests wouldn't represent good filtration. It only means that test results would not be repeatable. specifically MADE TO DIGEST and FALL APART in the presence of water/liquids. Fibers for toilet paper and paper towel rolls are NOT Water, yes. Oil, no. arranged into a graded pore density (the retention of the upsteam surface is larger than the downstream or exit portion of the depth of media) such as a typical TRUE depth filter': which means grade pore density....pores/cpature Again, just because it doesn't have a graded pore density doesn't mean it doesn't work. It only means it would work better if it had a graded pore density. sites get smaller as one goes deeper into the matrix. For a fixed pre density (such a roll of toilet paper) what is not captured on the surface can migrate all-the-way-through the 'filter. Your implication Of course it can. But so can it with a pleated edge filter. Again, with the paper rolls, the amount of dirt trapped vs. depth into the filter exhibits an exponential decline. If it had a graded pore density, the decline would be more linear. I agree that's a better situation. But again, that doesn't mean the paper rolls are not a good, cost effective solution to fuel polishing. of successive potential sucessive capture sites is only for VERY LARGE particles as with smaller and smaller size particles the removal mechanism of inertial impaction capture decrease logrithmically. A roll of toilet paper will wrinkle-up into a 'little knot' when high differential pressures are applied while UNLOADING most of the debris that it originally captured. This 'technology' came out the Which is why you monitor the filter with vacuum gauges and change it when the differential reaches more than an couple of pounds. The pleated resinated paper filter has VASTLY less resistance to flow, has a defined retention rating, will allow the pump to deliver more volumetric flow rate and at less amperage draw, requires smaller housing (on an equal flow basis) @ first /installation cost, has documented retention, flux. .... because of these advantages will reduce the resident particles in a tank to nearly undetectable limits ****exponentially faster**** than a filter that inherently DOES NOT FLOW and has poor retention ability, .... I guess an advantage is that the amperage draw of such a toilet paper system can help heat the interior of a boat in winter! Again, you're showing your inexperience with these fuel polishing systems. The walbro pump used with these systems doesn't draw more or heat up if it's flow is constricted. It uses magnetic sensing of the piston travel to activate the pump. So when the fuel flow rate slows down, so does the pumping without drawing any more power. In fact, the way it operates, it actually draws less power as the flow rate slows down. Yet another way (besides the vacuum gauges) to tell if your filters are getting clogged is to listen to the pump. You can hear the "ticking" get slower as the flow rate diminishes. Please answer the following: What is the collapse pressure of a toilet paper roll? What is the particle retention rating on either an absolute basis or 'nominal' rating? How about a beta value? or do you just depends on 'dumb luck'. What is the loss of efficiency due to the 'knife edge seals? What is the percent of bypass at 30uM at the knife edge? 20uM, 10uM, 2uM What is the wet strength rating? What is the recommended flow rate of a toilet paper roll? How do you 'size' a toilet paper filter to operate at the low motive pressure of a fuel system? Is it ....."Just BUY one and see if it works" .... hardly! Tell me which toilet paper mill makes a 'technical grade' of paper? Tell again that a rolled paper filter is more efficient than a 'cartridge'. ... include the PRICE of the housing in your evaluation/reply. Whats the 'dirt capacity' of a to9ilet paper roll? A 2.5" dia X 10" pleated typically has about 150 grams capacity..... an equivalent cartridge true depth filter (in cartridge format) will have about 20-25 grams capacity. I can't answer any of the below questions for my Racor either. But that doesn't mean I don't think it works. Now I have some questions for you. Please answer the following: Why do you think my 2 micron Racor is not pluged up after installing the TP filters and running for about 40 hours off of the same fuel that, before installing the TP filters, completely clogged 2 Racor elements in a row after 20 minutes each? Why, when changing the TP filters, do they come out hard and solid with no noticable disintegration, black on the bottom up to about 1/2" deep but nice and red at the top? While there are some black streaks on the side of the element that go up further then 1/2" (some are maybe 2 or 3 inches long) indicating some fluid going up the side between the canister and the roll, why have none of the black streakes ever reached the top of the roll, indicating that the fuel is still being filtered even as it passes up along the cartridge side? (I do compress the roll in fairly tightly when installing it and they are still slightly compressed against the side when I pull them out.) All I can suggest to you is "Just BUY one and see if it works" .... :) I think you'll find that if you have a dirty fuel problem, this will be one of the most cost effective solutions to fix it. Of course, if you don't already have a fuel problem that's bad enough to be clogging up Racors in only 20 minutes, you won't notice a benefit over just the Racor. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:07:05 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Boy, wouldn't that be great. Unfortunately I have a tank that doesn't have an access port and probably hasn't been cleaned since it was installed 24 years ago. Sure, I could cut holes in the tank and clean it out ... who knows what I'll find in there. Or I could replace the tank with one that's already set up to clean out. But both of those solutions are much more expensive then what I did, which also solved my dirty fuel problem. Disclaimer: Don't do what I did. Don't take my word for it. Just because it worked for me doesn't mean it will work for you. There, how's that?:) Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:07:05 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: All this discussion about filtration is actually misleading. If you periodically inspect and or clean the tank occasionally, you will have minimal problems. Buy only 'fresh' fuel. Clean your tank every now and then. Use a recirc. filtration system. Dont worry, be happy. Boy, wouldn't that be great. Unfortunately I have a tank that doesn't have an access port and probably hasn't been cleaned since it was installed 24 years ago. Sure, I could cut holes in the tank and clean it out ... who knows what I'll find in there. Or I could replace the tank with one that's already set up to clean out. But both of those solutions are much more expensive then what I did, which also solved my dirty fuel problem. Disclaimer: Don't do what I did. Don't take my word for it. Just because it worked for me doesn't mean it will work for you. There, how's that?:) Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I used a general purpose replacement truck fuel pump, that pumps at
around 60GPH according to the label, but probably really at around 30gph. It is a free-flow pump, in that the engine can draw fuel through it while it is sitting idle. The pump draws fuel through either a single Racor 10Micron filter, or the Racor and a Fram 1 Micron, and it can be setup to return the fuel to the thank via the fuel return line, or to the engine, priming it. This pump is available from Car Parts Stores for around $65. Larry DeMers s/v DeLaMer Cape Dory 30 Lake Superior Steven Dubnoff wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:49:20 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: I was looking at a Groco or Jabsco pump which seems good for transfer purposes, but way exceeds the flowrate of the filter when polishing... What happens when a 5.5 GPM pump (Jabsco) is pushing fuel through a filter rated at 60 GPH (RACOR 500)? It won't pump at its rated flow. The simplest thing to do is to put in the three valves that are necessary to bypass the pump. You can then bypass the pump for transfer purposes and put it back when you are running your engine. While you are at it, it would be good to put in an extra Racor and the necessary plumbing to switch between two while you are underway. Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------- Steven Dubnoff Circle Systems We make your data instantly usable. Download Stat/Transfer from http://www.stattransfer.com 1001 Fourth Avenue, #3200 (206) 682-3783 Seattle, WA 98154 Fax (206) 328-4788 |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I used a general purpose replacement truck fuel pump, that pumps at
around 60GPH according to the label, but probably really at around 30gph. It is a free-flow pump, in that the engine can draw fuel through it while it is sitting idle. The pump draws fuel through either a single Racor 10Micron filter, or the Racor and a Fram 1 Micron, and it can be setup to return the fuel to the thank via the fuel return line, or to the engine, priming it. This pump is available from Car Parts Stores for around $65. Larry DeMers s/v DeLaMer Cape Dory 30 Lake Superior Steven Dubnoff wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 17:49:20 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: I was looking at a Groco or Jabsco pump which seems good for transfer purposes, but way exceeds the flowrate of the filter when polishing... What happens when a 5.5 GPM pump (Jabsco) is pushing fuel through a filter rated at 60 GPH (RACOR 500)? It won't pump at its rated flow. The simplest thing to do is to put in the three valves that are necessary to bypass the pump. You can then bypass the pump for transfer purposes and put it back when you are running your engine. While you are at it, it would be good to put in an extra Racor and the necessary plumbing to switch between two while you are underway. Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------- Steven Dubnoff Circle Systems We make your data instantly usable. Download Stat/Transfer from http://www.stattransfer.com 1001 Fourth Avenue, #3200 (206) 682-3783 Seattle, WA 98154 Fax (206) 328-4788 |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:00:00 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: Thats entirely untrue (Im being 'kind' here) If you generate a bacterial slime/gel, that slime will 'de-polarize' and block the flow based on surface area. Just compare the surface of an open spaced (pleats not toughing together) pleated filter versus the surface area of a cylindrical paper roll. This appears to be the benefit held out by depth filters: their effective surface area is higher than pleated resin coated paper filters, because the filter surface is spread through the depth of the medium. Also show me ANY data that you have on removal capacity on a per weight basis vs. particle retention for a "roll of paper" filter. Weight basis versus particle retention? Not sure what you mean here. You can of course document to an industry wide standard OSU F-2 test stand test regime ???? I think not. I don't know. Do you have any retention efficiencies versus face velocity or gpm/psid?? The retention efficiency is extended to smaller particle sizes for depth type filters than surface type filters. This ought not to be surprizing - the same effect is seen in any depth type filter: for example, the glass filters you place in the home air conditioner can have a ball point pressed through them, yet retain rather small particles.... Whats the wet-strength of a roll of Charmin? Bounty? What is thier average retention rating? Heavy water contamination would be a weakness of non- resin paper elements, in my view. But then again, allowing significant water to remain in a fuel sytem is asking for trouble. The usual remedies are 1) Sump sampling/draining. 2) Water separation cup/drain in the feed line (even tractors have had these for about 80 years!) Would you prefer the water to get through a resin coated paper surface filter and stop the engine? If you cant, its just SNAKE-OIL. Actually no. It's a non-sequitor to say what is not documented, is thereby demonstrated as mythical ('snake-oil') Can you document the particle retention profile of the air conditioning filters that you PERSONALLY use???? I think not (to use your turn of phrase...) Brian W |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 07:00:00 GMT, Rich Hampel
wrote: Thats entirely untrue (Im being 'kind' here) If you generate a bacterial slime/gel, that slime will 'de-polarize' and block the flow based on surface area. Just compare the surface of an open spaced (pleats not toughing together) pleated filter versus the surface area of a cylindrical paper roll. This appears to be the benefit held out by depth filters: their effective surface area is higher than pleated resin coated paper filters, because the filter surface is spread through the depth of the medium. Also show me ANY data that you have on removal capacity on a per weight basis vs. particle retention for a "roll of paper" filter. Weight basis versus particle retention? Not sure what you mean here. You can of course document to an industry wide standard OSU F-2 test stand test regime ???? I think not. I don't know. Do you have any retention efficiencies versus face velocity or gpm/psid?? The retention efficiency is extended to smaller particle sizes for depth type filters than surface type filters. This ought not to be surprizing - the same effect is seen in any depth type filter: for example, the glass filters you place in the home air conditioner can have a ball point pressed through them, yet retain rather small particles.... Whats the wet-strength of a roll of Charmin? Bounty? What is thier average retention rating? Heavy water contamination would be a weakness of non- resin paper elements, in my view. But then again, allowing significant water to remain in a fuel sytem is asking for trouble. The usual remedies are 1) Sump sampling/draining. 2) Water separation cup/drain in the feed line (even tractors have had these for about 80 years!) Would you prefer the water to get through a resin coated paper surface filter and stop the engine? If you cant, its just SNAKE-OIL. Actually no. It's a non-sequitor to say what is not documented, is thereby demonstrated as mythical ('snake-oil') Can you document the particle retention profile of the air conditioning filters that you PERSONALLY use???? I think not (to use your turn of phrase...) Brian W |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Because small filters ahead of the lift pump stress the pump and cause premature failure. No fun. Not if you run a large enough (as in surface area) filter and change it regularly. At 1 - 5 gph through a Racor 900 I don't see how you could over stress a well built lift pump. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Because small filters ahead of the lift pump stress the pump and cause premature failure. No fun. Not if you run a large enough (as in surface area) filter and change it regularly. At 1 - 5 gph through a Racor 900 I don't see how you could over stress a well built lift pump. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: Jere Lull You don't want too fine a filter on the suction side. On Yanmars (and others), the lift pump can fail sooner due to the restriction. My point is if you use a large surface area small micron filter and change it regularly, you should never see high suction pressures. The idea is to do the cleaning in stages: 30 micron before the lift pump, 10 micron just before the high pressure pump. That said, we used 10 micron Racor elements for 8-9 seasons and 1000 hours with no significant ill effects except when we got a shot of algae. 8-9 years without changing the element! Your perpetuating a stereo type Jere. :-) The on-engine filter never had any significant dirt on it (or in the bowl). That didn't change much when we went to 30 microns, as it happens. Note: We were able to limp home when the last filter on board clogged up during the algae incident: Pulled the filter and gently brushed junk off of the surface, and drained and cleaned the bowl (again). For a couple of hours, we could only pull half revs, but the fuel cleaned up nicely at reduced flow and (after draining the dead bodies from the bowl again) we had full power for the rest of the season. Yeah, been there, done that. Lots of fun when there's a sea running. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred :) Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred :) Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" I don't think mine is a well built marine fuel tank. But is what I have. I'll know more when I open it up this winter an peer inside. Let us know what you find. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" I don't think mine is a well built marine fuel tank. But is what I have. I'll know more when I open it up this winter an peer inside. Let us know what you find. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. No I didn't. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. That's my point. It takes much more aggressive agitation than "bubbling" in one baffled area to get the fuel stirred up and moving through your "tunnels". Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. No I didn't. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. That's my point. It takes much more aggressive agitation than "bubbling" in one baffled area to get the fuel stirred up and moving through your "tunnels". Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" They have to, and there is usually a hole through the baffles at the lowest point of each baffle. Have to what? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" They have to, and there is usually a hole through the baffles at the lowest point of each baffle. Have to what? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump/on a mini tear
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump/on a mini tear
From: Brian Whatcott On 29 Nov 2003 20:46:04 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: Brian Whatcott Ahem...you meant mineral lubricating oil, rather than mineral fuel oil? Yeah, that's what he means. And check out the tolerances in a "mineral oil" lubricating pump verses the tolerances in a "mineral oil" fuel injector pump. Then maybe you will grasp why proper "mineral oil" fuel filtration is more critical than "mineral oil" lubrication filtation. Capt. Bill You are off-beam, Perhaps. But my point is that just because fuel oil and lubricating oil come from the same base material does not mean that they are filtered in the same way with the same filter materials or to the same standards with no thought as to how they are being used. in my not so humble view. That makes two of us. But then if you prefer to be addressed as "Capt." I can suppose that your opinion is not that of an engineer? You'd be right. And I believe it was engineers who assured the Captain of the Titanic that it was unsinkable. So, do you have opinions on brain surgery for me to grasp too? Yes. Try not to have it done if you can. You have one those as well, after all! :-) True. Thanks for noticing. (no offence) No offense taken. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump/on a mini tear
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump/on a mini tear
From: Brian Whatcott On 29 Nov 2003 20:46:04 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: Brian Whatcott Ahem...you meant mineral lubricating oil, rather than mineral fuel oil? Yeah, that's what he means. And check out the tolerances in a "mineral oil" lubricating pump verses the tolerances in a "mineral oil" fuel injector pump. Then maybe you will grasp why proper "mineral oil" fuel filtration is more critical than "mineral oil" lubrication filtation. Capt. Bill You are off-beam, Perhaps. But my point is that just because fuel oil and lubricating oil come from the same base material does not mean that they are filtered in the same way with the same filter materials or to the same standards with no thought as to how they are being used. in my not so humble view. That makes two of us. But then if you prefer to be addressed as "Capt." I can suppose that your opinion is not that of an engineer? You'd be right. And I believe it was engineers who assured the Captain of the Titanic that it was unsinkable. So, do you have opinions on brain surgery for me to grasp too? Yes. Try not to have it done if you can. You have one those as well, after all! :-) True. Thanks for noticing. (no offence) No offense taken. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Two kinds of water in fuel oil ..... free water (gravity drains to
lowest portion of system) water/oil emulsion (stays in the fluid as a suspension and doesnt settle quickly. |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Two kinds of water in fuel oil ..... free water (gravity drains to
lowest portion of system) water/oil emulsion (stays in the fluid as a suspension and doesnt settle quickly. |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction
on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Because small filters ahead of the lift pump stress the pump and cause premature failure. No fun. Not if you run a large enough (as in surface area) filter and change it regularly. At 1 - 5 gph through a Racor 900 I don't see how you could over stress a well built lift pump. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction
on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Because small filters ahead of the lift pump stress the pump and cause premature failure. No fun. Not if you run a large enough (as in surface area) filter and change it regularly. At 1 - 5 gph through a Racor 900 I don't see how you could over stress a well built lift pump. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from
one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred :) Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from
one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Not sure that matters much. If the fuel can negoatiate the baffles then I suspect the crud can as well. Hence the problem. Once the fuel is shaken not stirred :) Yes, but just bubbling up the fuel in one baffled area doesn't cut it. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Have to have tunnels between the baffles.
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" They have to, and there is usually a hole through the baffles at the lowest point of each baffle. Have to what? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Have to have tunnels between the baffles.
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" They have to, and there is usually a hole through the baffles at the lowest point of each baffle. Have to what? Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Yes, but it is better than nothing.
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. No I didn't. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. That's my point. It takes much more aggressive agitation than "bubbling" in one baffled area to get the fuel stirred up and moving through your "tunnels". Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Yes, but it is better than nothing.
"LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. No I didn't. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. That's my point. It takes much more aggressive agitation than "bubbling" in one baffled area to get the fuel stirred up and moving through your "tunnels". Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I gave up on "primary" and "secondary" to describe filters... I use
"initial" and "final" to describe mine. Oh yea, there's the polishing F-1 filter that works great! "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... But the reality is that these things do work. There is tons of annecdotal evedence. Please explain to me how it is that after hours of polishing, the TP element is black with gunk and the 2uM Raycor following it still relatively clean. I really don't need all these specs to allow me to believe what I can see with my own eyes. Plus having the 2 uM Raycor at the end gives me a safety net in case any of the little bugger sneak around the TP. Then another couple filters (Raycor + engine filter) further protect the engine. Is the filter on the engine the Primary or Secondary. DIfferent folks seem to use different terminology. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... Thats entirely untrue (Im being 'kind' here) If you generate a bacterial slime/gel, that slime will 'de-polarize' and block the flow based on surface area. Just compare the surface of an open spaced (pleats not toughing together) pleated filter versus the surface area of a cylindrical paper roll. Also show me ANY data that you have on removal capacity on a per weight basis vs. particle retention for a "roll of paper" filter. You can of course document to an industry wide standard OSU F-2 test stand test regime ???? I think not. Do you have any retention efficiencies versus face velocity or gpm/psid?? Whats the wet-strength of a roll of Charmin? Bounty? What is thier average retention rating? If you cant, its just SNAKE-OIL. In article , Keith wrote: You need to look at depth filtration for polishing vs. surface filtration like the Racors. They will clog up very fast if you have dirty fuel. See the link I posted earlier, and take a look at depth filters like the GCF F-1 or Jr. "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... I don't have a filter problem, I have a pump question. Doug "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message hlink.net... "Doug Dotson" writes: I am designing a fuel polishing and transfer system. My thought is to use valves to route fuel from any tank to any tank. No problem with that part. I want to be able to just transfer fuel or switch in a filter to polish the fuel while transferring. Since I can select the same tank for source and destination, I can polish fuel in place as well. The problem comes with the selection of a pump. I was looking at a Groco or Jabsco pump which seems good for transfer purposes, but way exceeds the flowrate of the filter when polishing. A Walbro fuel pump (which I have as a priming pump now) seems like a good fit for polishing (33 GPH) but will be slow when just transferring fuel. What happens when a 5.5 GPM pump (Jabsco) is pushing fuel through a filter rated at 60 GPH (RACOR 500)? Have built the system above which BTW, uses a lot of 1/2" bronze ball valves. You solve the filter problem in a straight forward fashion. Multiple filters (Larger than 500) in parallel to reach at least 60 GPH. I'd built in a safety margin and shoot for at least 75 GPH. HTH -- Lew S/A: Challenge, The Bullet Proof Boat, (Under Construction in the Southland) Visit: http://home.earthlink.net/~lewhodgett for Pictures |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I gave up on "primary" and "secondary" to describe filters... I use
"initial" and "final" to describe mine. Oh yea, there's the polishing F-1 filter that works great! "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... But the reality is that these things do work. There is tons of annecdotal evedence. Please explain to me how it is that after hours of polishing, the TP element is black with gunk and the 2uM Raycor following it still relatively clean. I really don't need all these specs to allow me to believe what I can see with my own eyes. Plus having the 2 uM Raycor at the end gives me a safety net in case any of the little bugger sneak around the TP. Then another couple filters (Raycor + engine filter) further protect the engine. Is the filter on the engine the Primary or Secondary. DIfferent folks seem to use different terminology. Doug s/v Callista "Rich Hampel" wrote in message ... Thats entirely untrue (Im being 'kind' here) If you generate a bacterial slime/gel, that slime will 'de-polarize' and block the flow based on surface area. Just compare the surface of an open spaced (pleats not toughing together) pleated filter versus the surface area of a cylindrical paper roll. Also show me ANY data that you have on removal capacity on a per weight basis vs. particle retention for a "roll of paper" filter. You can of course document to an industry wide standard OSU F-2 test stand test regime ???? I think not. Do you have any retention efficiencies versus face velocity or gpm/psid?? Whats the wet-strength of a roll of Charmin? Bounty? What is thier average retention rating? If you cant, its just SNAKE-OIL. In article , Keith wrote: You need to look at depth filtration for polishing vs. surface filtration like the Racors. They will clog up very fast if you have dirty fuel. See the link I posted earlier, and take a look at depth filters like the GCF F-1 or Jr. "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... I don't have a filter problem, I have a pump question. Doug "Lew Hodgett" wrote in message hlink.net... "Doug Dotson" writes: I am designing a fuel polishing and transfer system. My thought is to use valves to route fuel from any tank to any tank. No problem with that part. I want to be able to just transfer fuel or switch in a filter to polish the fuel while transferring. Since I can select the same tank for source and destination, I can polish fuel in place as well. The problem comes with the selection of a pump. I was looking at a Groco or Jabsco pump which seems good for transfer purposes, but way exceeds the flowrate of the filter when polishing. A Walbro fuel pump (which I have as a priming pump now) seems like a good fit for polishing (33 GPH) but will be slow when just transferring fuel. What happens when a 5.5 GPM pump (Jabsco) is pushing fuel through a filter rated at 60 GPH (RACOR 500)? Have built the system above which BTW, uses a lot of 1/2" bronze ball valves. You solve the filter problem in a straight forward fashion. Multiple filters (Larger than 500) in parallel to reach at least 60 GPH. I'd built in a safety margin and shoot for at least 75 GPH. HTH -- Lew S/A: Challenge, The Bullet Proof Boat, (Under Construction in the Southland) Visit: http://home.earthlink.net/~lewhodgett for Pictures |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
LaBomba182 wrote:
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: Jere Lull You don't want too fine a filter on the suction side. On Yanmars (and others), the lift pump can fail sooner due to the restriction. My point is if you use a large surface area small micron filter and change it regularly, you should never see high suction pressures. If you do both, it's better, of course. We balance cost in there someplace, of course. I figure a new 30-micron filter will have one third (or 1/9th?) the resistance, switching up to a 900 would only (about) halve it. When there's a bit of dirt, though, the 30 micron filter will clog less while still protecting the lift pump. The idea is to do the cleaning in stages: 30 micron before the lift pump, 10 micron just before the high pressure pump. That said, we used 10 micron Racor elements for 8-9 seasons and 1000 hours with no significant ill effects except when we got a shot of algae. 8-9 years without changing the element! Your perpetuating a stereo type Jere. :-) You're right, that wasn't entirely clear. We change the filters each spring as cheap insurance. I haven't noticed any discoloration in the primary filter or bowl except when I brushed the Racor during the algae incident, and that could well have been my mishandling. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com