Fuel transfer/polishing pump
LaBomba182 wrote:
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: Jere Lull You don't want too fine a filter on the suction side. On Yanmars (and others), the lift pump can fail sooner due to the restriction. My point is if you use a large surface area small micron filter and change it regularly, you should never see high suction pressures. If you do both, it's better, of course. We balance cost in there someplace, of course. I figure a new 30-micron filter will have one third (or 1/9th?) the resistance, switching up to a 900 would only (about) halve it. When there's a bit of dirt, though, the 30 micron filter will clog less while still protecting the lift pump. The idea is to do the cleaning in stages: 30 micron before the lift pump, 10 micron just before the high pressure pump. That said, we used 10 micron Racor elements for 8-9 seasons and 1000 hours with no significant ill effects except when we got a shot of algae. 8-9 years without changing the element! Your perpetuating a stereo type Jere. :-) You're right, that wasn't entirely clear. We change the filters each spring as cheap insurance. I haven't noticed any discoloration in the primary filter or bowl except when I brushed the Racor during the algae incident, and that could well have been my mishandling. -- Jere Lull Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD) Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/ |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. If that's the case, then you have to do what they say. At least until the warranty runs out. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. If that's the case, then you have to do what they say. At least until the warranty runs out. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: Jere Lull I figure a new 30-micron filter will have one third (or 1/9th?) the resistance, switching up to a 900 would only (about) halve it. I would guess much less than that. Based on the surface area of a 900. You're right, that wasn't entirely clear. We change the filters each spring as cheap insurance. Got it. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes, many times. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. Never suggested that. I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. More like notches. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Len Krauss" No offense -- but have you? Yes, many times. They're are not solid top to bottom as you seem to suggest. Never suggested that. I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. The plate bottoms, in particular, usually have tunnels. More like notches. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Have to have tunnels between the baffles. Yes. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Have to have tunnels between the baffles. Yes. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Yes, but it is better than nothing. At least for that one baffled area. Which may be on the far side of the tank away from the pickup. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" Yes, but it is better than nothing. At least for that one baffled area. Which may be on the far side of the tank away from the pickup. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Invalid statement. In one case you are talking about lubrication oil,
in the other your are talking about fuel. A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Invalid statement. In one case you are talking about lubrication oil,
in the other your are talking about fuel. A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still
runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still
runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Huh? Bubbling up fuel? It helps it as much as drawing the fuel from one baffled area into the engine. Better to draw it into a polishing system for a while. But unless the fuel is shaken up real well most of the crud is still at the bottom of each baffled area in a nice little mound. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
If it is away from the pickup, then it isn't entering into the problem.
If things get stirred up then the polishing system will do its job better. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Yes, but it is better than nothing. At least for that one baffled area. Which may be on the far side of the tank away from the pickup. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
If it is away from the pickup, then it isn't entering into the problem.
If things get stirred up then the polishing system will do its job better. Doug "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" Yes, but it is better than nothing. At least for that one baffled area. Which may be on the far side of the tank away from the pickup. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. And hence the crud as well. Doug |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
I assumed it was understood that there would have to be a way for the fuel to travel from one baffled area to the next. And hence the crud as well. Doug |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think
I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. If that's the case, then you have to do what they say. At least until the warranty runs out. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
After having my lift pump fail half way across the Gulf Stream, I think
I'll stick to what Yanmar and the mechanic in FL suggested even beyond the warranty. Doug s/v Callista "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: "Doug Dotson" The memo from Yanmar (via Mack Boring) didn't make any distinction on type of filter. Just the porosity on the element. Perhaps it was a CYA move to specify anything smaller than 30 uM. If that's the case, then you have to do what they say. At least until the warranty runs out. :-) Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On 03 Dec 2003 03:39:16 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote:
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Yeah, but after that Chevy 350 engine runs for years with dirty oil, you'll probably find that the bearing surfaces are more prematurely worn than the oil pump. The reason is that the bearing surfaces are speced to operate with clean, filtered lubricating oil. After years of running, the filter has probably clogged so much that it's always in bypass mode, and maybe even torn, allowing all the dirt to wear the bearings. The oil pump, on the other hand (and unlike a fuel injector pump) is designed to run in dirty oil... so it's tolerances have to be less. All dirt trapped in the lubricating oil filter has already passed through the oil pump. And *that* is why your statement above is a red herring, because the lubricating pump always pumps pre-filtered oil so it matters very little what the filter is doing. By the way, instead of saying "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil." I should have said "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out *prematurely" due to dirty lubricating oil." Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On 03 Dec 2003 03:39:16 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote:
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Yeah, but after that Chevy 350 engine runs for years with dirty oil, you'll probably find that the bearing surfaces are more prematurely worn than the oil pump. The reason is that the bearing surfaces are speced to operate with clean, filtered lubricating oil. After years of running, the filter has probably clogged so much that it's always in bypass mode, and maybe even torn, allowing all the dirt to wear the bearings. The oil pump, on the other hand (and unlike a fuel injector pump) is designed to run in dirty oil... so it's tolerances have to be less. All dirt trapped in the lubricating oil filter has already passed through the oil pump. And *that* is why your statement above is a red herring, because the lubricating pump always pumps pre-filtered oil so it matters very little what the filter is doing. By the way, instead of saying "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil." I should have said "But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out *prematurely" due to dirty lubricating oil." Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing
systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing
systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Pretty sure I posted a link early in this conversation that shows a diagram
of a polishing system based on a GCF F-1 filter that allows either polishing or running with the F-1 as the first filter before going into the Racor while running. If I didn't, or you can't find it, here it is again: http://www.trawlerworld.com/features_06.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Pretty sure I posted a link early in this conversation that shows a diagram
of a polishing system based on a GCF F-1 filter that allows either polishing or running with the F-1 as the first filter before going into the Racor while running. If I didn't, or you can't find it, here it is again: http://www.trawlerworld.com/features_06.htm "Doug Dotson" wrote in message ... That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Steve,
I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Steve,
I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. Doug s/v Callista "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:21:58 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That would require me to have 2 pretty much independent polishing systems. I don't really have the room for that and the extra expense would be hard to justify. I guess I don't understand your system. Why would it require two independent polishing systems? Even with a single set of filters (GCF fillowed by Racor) you can use valves and piping to plumb the thing any way you want. Steve "Steven Shelikoff" wrote in message ... On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 23:41:45 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote: That may be true, and as long as it stays there the engine still runs fine. If it does get shaken up, the a polishing system will do its job while lessing the crud going through the engine filtering system. Once initial polishing is done, I will be alternating between tanks. One running while the other polishing. Getting things shaken up is the best thing I can hope for. Why not just always leave the polishing system in-line? Allow for a bypass to change a filter or if it develops a vacuum leak, but other then that, there's nothing wrong with always using "just polished" fuel. Steve |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill Invalid statement. Really? Without foundation. How so? Are you saying a diesel will run a long time with dirty fuel? In one case you are talking about lubrication oil, in the other your are talking about fuel. Correct. But that does that make those statements "invalid"? A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Of course it will. But that has no relation to how long it will run with dirty or poorly filtered fuel. Other than to back up just what I was saying, that lubricating oil does not need to be filtered as well as fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump
From: "Doug Dotson" "LaBomba182" wrote in message ... Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: On 29 Nov 2003 20:48:01 GMT, (LaBomba182) wrote: Subject: Fuel transfer/polishing pump From: (Steven Shelikoff) Not much difference between diesel and oil. Perhaps, but there is a world of difference between the tolerances of a fuel injector pump and an oil pump. True. But that's a red herring since it's not usually the oil pump that wears out due to dirty lubricating oil. Not quite. A 350 Chevy engine will run for a long time, years maybe, with dirty oil. A diesel injection pump and/or injectors with dirty fuel will not. Capt. Bill Invalid statement. Really? Without foundation. How so? Are you saying a diesel will run a long time with dirty fuel? In one case you are talking about lubrication oil, in the other your are talking about fuel. Correct. But that does that make those statements "invalid"? A diesel will run quite a long time without changing the oil just a s gas engine will. Of course it will. But that has no relation to how long it will run with dirty or poorly filtered fuel. Other than to back up just what I was saying, that lubricating oil does not need to be filtered as well as fuel oil to keep a fuel injected engine running. Capt. Bill |
Fuel transfer/polishing pump
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 21:10:23 -0500, "Doug Dotson" wrote:
Steve, I understood that you were suggesting that I leave the polishing system running while running the engine. Since I have 2 tanks it seems to me to require two polishing systems to keep polishing while running. The system I have designed allows me to polish either of the two tanks at any time and run the engine out of either tank at any time as well. So I can polish the same one I am running out of if I wish. I guess the choice of which to polish while running is up for grabs. I think I'd route it so that I can route either tank to the polishing system then 'T' the polishing system to the engine and the return to either tank. Just make sure you're returning to the same tank you're drawing from. A simplified version (without bypass plumbing which is a pain to draw) looks something like this: (view with fixed point font like courier) -------------- /--------------------------T---------| | Y select / return to tanks | | ---------- | --------------- | | | |(to tank 2) | check valve | | | Tank 1 | --------------- | | |---------- ------------- | | ---------- | | Polishing | -------- | ---------- |from | filters | | | | \ | | Y select /----| with |-| Pump |-T- \-| Engine | ---------- /tanks| bypassing | | | | | | | | ------------- -------- ---------- | Tank 2 | | | |---------- ---------- out If the above ascii drawing looks horrible, sorry.:) But basically, the supply from both tanks goes to a Y valve which feeds either to the polishing filters. That's where you'd put the bypass valves so you can go around any filter (GCF or Racor). Then to a T where one side goes to a shutoff valve then to the engine. The shutoff valve is so that you can turn off fuel to the engine while you're priming the system after changing filters so air won't get in the engine. You can also plumb it so that the engine can draw from the tanka bypassing the filters so you can prime them and run the engine at the same time if that's a requirement. I didn't care about that since I don't run the engine all that much (sailboat.) Also not shown is that you want to install vacuum gauges, one before the GCF filter, one between the GCF and the Racor and one after the Racor before the Walbro pump. Any difference more than a few psi across a filter means it's time for an element change. The other side of the T goes to a check valve. That's there so that if the electric pump fails the engine won't suck air from the return lines. Then there's a T where the engine return and the polishing system return join and go to another Y valve to select where to return the fuel to. Just make sure both Y valves are in the same position. You can also use this as a fuel transfering pump if you want to, by putting the Y valves in different positions. But be careful you don't overflow the tank being filled. Steve |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com