Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wilbur ,, you are once again absolutely right on. Women on a sailboat?
What a waste of good pussy. No wonder we haven't dropped any nukes lately. What the heck is happening to this country. Sailing is a man's sport. Period. We men need our "time" away. Doing men's things; farting, drinking excessively, wearing panty hose, putting on lipstick, mooning other boats, .... just being MEN. At the end of a hard day at sea, we want nothing more than a cold drink, a hot piece of ass, and some food. That is where we need our women. At the yacht club picnic area. By the time we arrive they have been drinking wine for hours. Most are so drunk, they can not stand up straight. So, we do what men have been doing since the first yacht club was started; we take advantage of the situation, screw someone's girlfriend, or wife. Yes! There is nothing more pleasureable than doing the wife of the bank president or having the good fortune to have Becky, the dock girl, sucking your pecker. Dressed in our blue blazers, with white pants, a Harveys Bristol Cream in one hand, and a good cigar in the other, we get to enjoy our time together talking about the important matters such as Biff's education or Tyler's new black girlfriend. I would rather be run down by a tramp steamer than put up with the constant whine of an unreliable crewmate. On a long voyage, there just isn't anything more manly than sitting next to John, your accountant, and realizing you have always had a crush on him. The two of you under the stars, watching the compass, ........ Reminds me of this movie about sheep farming ... never could figure out why the sheep were so happy. ============= ... As a general rule, women cannot be trusted without supervision aboard a sailing vessel. ... Total BS. I trust Maryann with my life regularly. I've sailed with many competent women and it is not uncommon to see cruising boats out there run by partners where the woman is the better sailor. In the local high school sailing league girls have proven time and again that they are at least as good as the boys at the varsity level. Oh, I'm not talking about some ridiculous varsity sport. I'm talking about coastal or off shore cruising where watches are taken so one or the other partner may grab some sleep. If you're honest, you will not help but notice there are far more men lone-handing than women. Is it because men would rather sail alone? In a few cases that may well be true but, for the most part, men who would dearly love to find a trustworthy sailing partner of the opposite sex cannot fine one because women simply are not interested. What kind of a life is living aboard a small yacht for a woman anyway? It's the very antithesis of what womanhood is all about these days. Gone are the days when the majority of women were more interested in being a helpmate for their husband than being a beauty queen set upon a throne for the whole world to admire. Overwhelming vanity and hedonism is what the modern-day woman embodies. Even the paltry few of those who are interested in yachts and cruising seem to be looking for a short cruise and not some long-term cruising lifestyle. Hence. they just don't take sailing seriously long enough to develop into skilled sailors. Those are the facts. Keep trusting your Maryann. One of these days, probably in the near future, she will let you down. The odds are very good that she will, at least. Wilbur Hubbard |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
oups.com: Total BS. I trust Maryann with my life regularly. I've sailed with many competent women and it is not uncommon to see cruising boats out there run by partners where the woman is the better sailor. In the local high school sailing league girls have proven time and again that they are at least as good as the boys at the varsity level. I agree....as long as the waves are small, the wind is light and the loads aren't heavy....or, as in the sailing league, the boat is small. At sea, in heavy weather, my 255 pound ass isn't big enough much of the time. I can't imagine a woman trying to get the main down in a 40 knot gale with rain pounding her and the deck boiling up around her. That's just not right, women's lib or no women's lib. She'll never be as strong as a man....sorry. Thinking otherwise, though politically wonderful, is foolhardy and dangerous. Larry -- |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry" wrote in message ... " wrote in oups.com: Total BS. I trust Maryann with my life regularly. I've sailed with many competent women and it is not uncommon to see cruising boats out there run by partners where the woman is the better sailor. In the local high school sailing league girls have proven time and again that they are at least as good as the boys at the varsity level. I agree....as long as the waves are small, the wind is light and the loads aren't heavy....or, as in the sailing league, the boat is small. At sea, in heavy weather, my 255 pound ass isn't big enough much of the time. I can't imagine a woman trying to get the main down in a 40 knot gale with rain pounding her and the deck boiling up around her. That's just not right, women's lib or no women's lib. She'll never be as strong as a man....sorry. Thinking otherwise, though politically wonderful, is foolhardy and dangerous. Larry -- I'll go head to head with most men any day of the week, Larry. My boat is sized for what I can handle. Nevertheless, your gendertyping doesn't take into account that there are plenty of women who are bigger than some men. Or even the average man, for that matter. And some day, we shall rule the Earth. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....
women's lib or no women's lib. She'll never be as strong as a man....sorry. Thinking otherwise, though politically wonderful, is foolhardy and dangerous. ... I think you are generalizing too much. Some people can work the main in a 40 knot squall and some can't. It is the Captain's responsibility to know the limitations of the crew and to make allowances for them. -- Tom. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Your posting got me wondering .... ..
you say ... ... "I've had two acquaintances die because their less competent partners failed to wake them in difficult conditions." Did the wives live? Huum... this sounds like a case for CSI Atlantic. Or Pacific,, Ocean,, ?? Water ?? Anyway,,, if both wives lived, and both husbands died and both boats were done in while the "little Lady" was on watch .. It would seem to me that you are "doing both widows". Yes,, that is the answer. No doubt about it.. Case solved. ============ wrote in message oups.com... No potshots from me, but a couple of comments that I hope are constructive. We're taking the Captain's classes beginning in a couple of weeks. That won't make us better sailors, necessarily, but it will add to our skillsets. The USCG tests for licenses assume that you have proven to be experienced and competent in the service that you are testing for and to a large extent just attempt to make sure there are no gaping holes in your knowledge. Courses for the licenses tend to assume much the same and cover a lot of ground very quickly. I wonder if it might not be more appropriate to look at classes intended for novices rather than professionals. she tells folks, now, that she wasn't in condition to stand watch, but didn't fetch me to either take over or assist. We'll not make that mistake again. This is critical. I've had two acquaintances die because their less competent partners failed to wake them in difficult conditions. In one case the boat was run down by a tow and in the other dragged onto a lee shore. The husbands and their boats were lost in a large part because their wives wanted to let them rest. I continually remind my crew that she must wake me whenever she has any questions or doubts and I try very hard to praise her each time she calls me even though most calls are false alarms. Sleep management and watch responsibility may be the hardest part of sailing short handed. -- Tom. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....
Did the wives live? Huum... this sounds like a case for CSI Atlantic. Or Pacific,, Ocean,, ?? Water ?? ... Yes, the wives lived, no there is no mystery. See the loss of the "Toolka T" in '01and "Woody Goose" in '98 both returning to New Zealand from the islands. -- Tom. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in
oups.com: This is critical. I've had two acquaintances die because their less competent partners failed to wake them in difficult conditions. In one case the boat was run down by a tow and in the other dragged onto a lee shore. The husbands and their boats were lost in a large part because their wives wanted to let them rest. I continually remind my crew that she must wake me whenever she has any questions or doubts and I try very hard to praise her each time she calls me even though most calls are false alarms. Sleep management and watch responsibility may be the hardest part of sailing short handed. For those sailor lurkers on the newsgroup....This is why you don't REALLY need a boat of your own. Sailing with just an incompetent wife, most of whom are NOT interested in playing captain-for-a-watch anyways, is fairly foolhardy. Oh, they get away with it a lot, as long as things don't turn sour. Then, having some hands aboard who know how to sail, fix things, navigate, etc., becomes invaluable. It works great, by the way, once you get over the "Captain Syndrome". You get to play captain for free...more than you want, actually...(c; Larry, 3rd Mate - Deck and Engineering -- When they call ME "captain", my response is: "Oh, no! Your not blamin' ME for this! YOU'RE the captain!" |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 6:40 pm, " wrote:
No potshots from me, but a couple of comments that I hope are constructive. We're taking the Captain's classes beginning in a couple of weeks. That won't make us better sailors, necessarily, but it will add to our skillsets. The USCG tests for licenses assume that you have proven to be experienced and competent in the service that you are testing for and to a large extent just attempt to make sure there are no gaping holes in your knowledge. Courses for the licenses tend to assume much the same and cover a lot of ground very quickly. I wonder if it might not be more appropriate to look at classes intended for novices rather than professionals. I agree. I think your money would be better spend on some other form of educational experience. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "capt.bill11" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 2, 6:40 pm, " wrote: No potshots from me, but a couple of comments that I hope are constructive. We're taking the Captain's classes beginning in a couple of weeks. That won't make us better sailors, necessarily, but it will add to our skillsets. The USCG tests for licenses assume that you have proven to be experienced and competent in the service that you are testing for and to a large extent just attempt to make sure there are no gaping holes in your knowledge. Courses for the licenses tend to assume much the same and cover a lot of ground very quickly. I wonder if it might not be more appropriate to look at classes intended for novices rather than professionals. I agree. I think your money would be better spend on some other form of educational experience. Power Squadron or Coast Guard Auxiliary courses would be ideal. I hate the idea of making them "mandatory," but they should be taken by anyone who boats on open water. In Italy, I couldn't operate a skiff with an outboard engine without passing a course and test first. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Italy? You are actually mentioning Italy in a posting about boating
safety? Italy? What next? France? Oh,, the humanity. ====================== "KLC Lewis" wrote in message et... "capt.bill11" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 2, 6:40 pm, " wrote: No potshots from me, but a couple of comments that I hope are constructive. We're taking the Captain's classes beginning in a couple of weeks. That won't make us better sailors, necessarily, but it will add to our skillsets. The USCG tests for licenses assume that you have proven to be experienced and competent in the service that you are testing for and to a large extent just attempt to make sure there are no gaping holes in your knowledge. Courses for the licenses tend to assume much the same and cover a lot of ground very quickly. I wonder if it might not be more appropriate to look at classes intended for novices rather than professionals. I agree. I think your money would be better spend on some other form of educational experience. Power Squadron or Coast Guard Auxiliary courses would be ideal. I hate the idea of making them "mandatory," but they should be taken by anyone who boats on open water. In Italy, I couldn't operate a skiff with an outboard engine without passing a course and test first. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Flying Pig Chronicles, Current Edition | Boat Building | |||
Flying Pig Chronicles, Current Edition | Cruising | |||
NEWS FROM FLYING PIG... | Cruising | |||
Logo contest! | Cruising |