Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
rigging wire
"Bruce" wrote in message ... I think that if you were "brooming" cable for the Stalok or Norseman fittings you were doing something wrong. At least if you were brooming them the same as you do with spelter sockets. With the spelter sockets you broom out the wire to as close as separate wires as possible while both the stalok and norseman instructions tell you to separate the cable into the separate twisted strands. the center strand fits in the center of the wedge and the outer strands lay down the outside. It is really a trivial task. Cheers, Bruce It was such a long time ago when I last did this that I cannot remember the exact type of the terminal in question but I seem to recall that the individual wires had to have an inward bend put onto their ends to follow, or to encourage them to follow, a corresponding curve on the end of the insert when the whole terminal was tightened up. I remember thinking that this was such a complicated procedure that the chances of getting it wrong were too high for comfort. |
#42
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
rigging wire
On Feb 12, 4:57 pm, Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:26:54 -0800 (PST), Two meter troll wrote: Your neighbor's roof wasn't immersed in salt water very often either. I doubt very much if galvanized wire will make a satisfactory anchor rode as I can't see how you can wash all the salt out of the stands so it will be rusting quietly away while on the drum. Casady Cheers, It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we dont have ss anchor's or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost diffrance. SS is mostly Cash flash there are other things that work as well or better and are cheaper to boot. I must say that I have never seen a work boat with a cable anchor rode so I can't comment other then the "well, it seems likely" argument that is so frequently totally incorrect. I have seen mooring lines, normally used on larger ships, that are galvanized but aren't intended to be dunked in the ocean on a daily basis. Cheers, Bruce Bruce how many would you like to see? not being a smart ass but i do realize that some proof is in the pudding. I have not ever seen a working vessel below 300 ton that did not have cable backed chain. I have no idea of how they do it in the east but here you got cable on the drum with maybe 5 shots of chain. what someone said about depth here is almost correct. not quite so deep but still much deeper that above the chain not as deep as south east alaska. I think the diffrence most times is that when we drop the hook in the open bays its because its blowing so we put out lots of scope. dunno most of my experiance is from working boats. they are not fast enough to make port from the tuna grounds before the bar closes. |
#43
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
rigging wire
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:44:06 +0700, Bruce
wrote: On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:39:58 +0000, IanM wrote: Richard Casady wrote: On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:35:15 +0700, Bruce wrote: The first problem comes when you attempt to locate proper heavy duty thimbles for the eyes. Damned hard to find. Next comes splicing the eyes in the cables. Again, if you can do it yourself and have the tools then go for it but if you are paying rigger's rates then get your wallet ready. Don't they have fittings that avoid the eyesplice, for stainless, but not for galvanized? That would do it even if stainless is six times as costly. I don't know about those compression sleeves. I remember in the fifties when Lands End sold nothing but sailboat stuff. They had sleeves and a tool that looked like a boltcutter. No, I was referring specifically to thimbles used in eye splices as I assumed that if one were complaining about costs one wouldn't want to buy swedge fittings as a non-stainless swedge fitting any where that it gets salt water on it probably has a shorter life then a properly made and served eye splice. Poured socket terminals were the 'gold standard' for wire rope terminals for the greater part of the last century. The end of the rope is splayed in a controlled fashion and spelter (usually zinc alloy) is poured in to the terminal to form a solid wedge retaining the rope. Used to be the Navy standard for all wire terminals used for safety critical lifting. Works for galvanized and bare steel wire but I believe its not so good for stainless as the spelter doesn't wet the strands properly. Check out chapter 10 of: http://www.fastlift.co.za/pdf/CASAR%20-%20Wire%20rope%20end%20connections.pdf Called "spelter sockets". There is a boat builder in Phuket that has proper bronze fittings cast and uses them from time to time. They used to be common around cranes but have largely been replaced by wedge sockets as the poured sockets take a bit of skill to make. Or perhaps more accurately, a bit of attention paid to the proper technique. for instructions. It should be noted that unlike most other terminal systems, it does not de-rate the wire strength from 100% I think you'll find that sta-lock type of fitting will test stronger then the cable. One test was 107% of rated cable strength. The tools and materials to do it are affordable and can be carried on board nearly any boat, the terminals are generally reusable and the galvanic compatibility is good, but you do need to be ashore or in a very sheltered location to work with molten spelter so some screw down compression fittings of any of the types suitable for galvanised wire would need to be stocked for any repairs under way. The spelter is just zinc in most cases. You can get 3/8 galv. for less than a buck a foot, breaking strength 14 000 lbs. My original reference was to anchor rode, and you can bet the ranch it wasn't stainless. You can brush grease over a wire filled winch drum and not get it on the rest of the boat. People who aren't useing it say it rusts. How come the zinc does not afford anodic protection to the steel. I drive by the neighors steel roof that has a third of the zinc gone, and no rust. No salt of course. My dad built the Iowa schooner [only been the one] and used galvanized. Whatever the local hardware store had. Your neighbor's roof wasn't immersed in salt water very often either. I doubt very much if galvanized wire will make a satisfactory anchor rode as I can't see how you can wash all the salt out of the stands so it will be rusting quietly away while on the drum. The galvanized will have more of a rust problem than the plain steel the tugs use, you say. I don't think so. Casady |
#44
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
rigging wire
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:50:35 -0600, Brian Whatcott
wrote: Two meter troll wrote: ... It makes a fine rode. jiminy what do folks think work boats carry? we don't have ss anchors or rodes. the cost is prohibitive and the life span is not as good. SS does not like to work. the only advantage SS has over good galv is that it is not supposed to rust Ever (if you get the wrong formulation it sure will). that still does not off set the cost difference. A useful little test for the stainless believers goes like this. Buy a bright shiny stainless bowl - like a surgical bowl or whatever. Put a cup of salt water in it, and leave it outside. Make sure it doesn't dry up. Check how long it takes to get a pinhole in the bowl. Try again with tap water - you should get the same result..... In that case, oxygen in the air can get at it to maintain the thin layer of chromium oxide that protects it in the manner aluminum oxide protecs aluminum. In the presence of salt and absence of oxygen, the chloride attacks it. It can also rust. I had a stainless bowl develop a pinhole in ordinary kitchen use. In the case of the so called stainless hose clamps, check them with a magnet at the store. The *******s often use plain carbon steel for the worm. Casady |
#45
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
rigging wire
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:26:40 +0100, "Edgar"
wrote: There are various grades of 'stainless' steel. The lower grades will be attracted by a magnet and will be likely to behave as you describe. The better grades are totally non-magnetic and are the only kind that should be on boat fittings. Take a small powerful magnet when you go to buy marine fittings as there is a lot of low-grade stuff on offer even if it is being sold for marine use. My refrigerator is all nonmagnetic stainless, cost three grand more than one with paint. Casady |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
stainless rigging wire - nick in wire | Cruising | |||
Wire Rigging for Ships | ASA | |||
Day Sailer One Mainsheet rigging, Halyards and Vang rigging | ASA | |||
Johnson 3 wire trim motor.. Red, Blue, green.. How to wire up? | General | |||
Reusable rigging wire terminals besides Stalok, Norseman? | Cruising |