Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"rhys" wrote in message
... I try not to sneer at trimarans and cats, either, because they provide a *different*, but equally valid and perfectly enjoyable alternative to my preferred monohull. Where I tend to get snotty is on the issue of seaworthiness: if you accept that a cat with a big flat sliding glass door on its bridge is going to have issues in a following sea, then you understand my objections are not to catamarans, but to catamarans that want to be patio sunrooms. I'm not sure why you have a problem with "flat sliding doors" since I've never heard of a failure of one. Or are you defining "seaworthiness" as something that "looks proper" as opposed to something that has been proven safe with a perfect safety record? Actually, I consider the door to be a major safety feature since you don't have to climb down a ladder to "go below." Modern cruising cats don't have a problem with seas breaking in the cockpit because the sterns are quite bouyant and lift easily. In many cats the door is almost amidships, so its rather unlikely to be tested even in the worst conditions. And the cockpit drains are usually 3 inch scuppers that drain directly below. I know that traditionally, large comfortable cockpits are not considered the safest for long passages, but they really aren't that bad on a cat. South Africa builds some apparently incredibly tough blue-water cats (they'd have to, given the conditions there), and while I'd personally have to learn to sail 'em, I'd let the brother buy one. You'd figure it out real quick. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Seaworthiness | Boat Building |