Dave the lawyer is an example of the typical uninformed asa dolt. He's
been suckered in by the hoax posts that tell everybody to vote AGAINST
H.R. 2550. Jeff, our other resident "genius" also seems to have drunk
the Kool-Aid.

For your information, dear reader, you've been duped by totally bogus
information. You've been told to have your congressman vote AGAINST the
House Rule.

Here's the real scoop from: http://www.boatus.com/gov/


"EPA Discharge Permit Requirement for Recreational Boats

"For 34 years the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has
exempted discharges from recreational boats from the Clean Water Act
permit system. Regretfully, a recent court ruling cancelled this permit
exemption. EPA is required by the court decision to develop and
implement by September 30, 2008 a national permit system for ALL vessels
in the United States for a variety of normal operational discharges.

"We have been working behind the scenes with other boating organizations
to get the exemption reinstated for recreational boats. Fortunately, the
Recreational Boating Act of 2007 (H.R. 2550) has been introduced by
Representatives Gene Taylor (D-Miss) and Candice Miller (R-Mich) which
would protect recreational boats from being swept into this unnecessary
and expensive permitting system.

"It is critically important that H.R. 2550 be passed and your support is
essential. Please contact your Congressman and Senators TODAY and ask
that they co-sponsor or support H.R. 2550."


I hope this helps and I hope it shows the folly of expecting armchair
lawyers like our Daffy Dave the Duffer to know their arses from a hole
in the ground.

Wilbur Hubbard

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:32:34 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

I hope this helps and I hope it shows the folly of expecting armchair
lawyers like our Daffy Dave the Duffer to know their arses from a hole
in the ground.

Having a little trouble with the Alzheimer's, Neal? Then I'll remind
you
that no one here has the foggiest idea what you're talking about
because the
discussion to which you refer took place in another group.

Yes, and if you had checked the headers you would have noted it was
cross-posted to that other group. Doh!


And it looks like you may, finally, have comprehended what Roger Long
told
you in that other forum on September 12 was correct, and that your
rant was
off the wall. I certainly pointed out your difficulties with
comprehension
of Roger's post enough times.

Wrong again, Barrister Boy! Anybody can research the thread and see how
you and others were just taking the dire, bogus warnings as fact. And,
it turned out the OP was totally wrong in asserting that everybody
needed to contact their Congressman or Senator to tell them to vote
AGAINST H.R. 225. My rant that leaving it under Federal control was the
way to go because that keeps 50 states from writing 50 different forms
of legislation. The only reason this whole thing is coming up is because
some stupid liberal judge (and former lawyer) legislated from the bench
and negated existing federal law. Now, with the passage of H.R. 225,
recreational boats will again be exempt from these onerous regulations.

I hope this helps. You should be ashamed, since you claim to be a
lawyer, that you were sucked in by a hoax that YOU could have and should
have dispelled instead of contributing to the false information. What
good are you, anyway? But, I suppose you've heard that question many
times from clients you represented who lost their case. Have a nice
day.

Wilbur Hubbard

OH the IRONY !



"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in
message
anews.com.
...
Dave the lawyer is an example of the typical uninformed
asa dolt. He's
been suckered in by the hoax posts that tell everybody to
vote AGAINST
H.R. 2550. Jeff, our other resident "genius" also seems to
have drunk
the Kool-Aid.

For your information, dear reader, you've been duped by
totally bogus
information. You've been told to have your congressman
vote AGAINST the
House Rule.

Here's the real scoop from: http://www.boatus.com/gov/


"EPA Discharge Permit Requirement for Recreational Boats

"For 34 years the federal Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has
exempted discharges from recreational boats from the Clean
Water Act
permit system. Regretfully, a recent court ruling
cancelled this permit
exemption. EPA is required by the court decision to
develop and
implement by September 30, 2008 a national permit system
for ALL vessels
in the United States for a variety of normal operational
discharges.

"We have been working behind the scenes with other boating
organizations
to get the exemption reinstated for recreational boats.
Fortunately, the
Recreational Boating Act of 2007 (H.R. 2550) has been
introduced by
Representatives Gene Taylor (D-Miss) and Candice Miller
(R-Mich) which
would protect recreational boats from being swept into
this unnecessary
and expensive permitting system.

"It is critically important that H.R. 2550 be passed and
your support is
essential. Please contact your Congressman and Senators
TODAY and ask
that they co-sponsor or support H.R. 2550."


I hope this helps and I hope it shows the folly of
expecting armchair
lawyers like our Daffy Dave the Duffer to know their arses
from a hole
in the ground.

Wilbur Hubbard

"Scotty" wrote in message
...
OH the IRONY !

Ironic that lawyers don't know squat? I'd say that's normal fare. Those
elitists are so uninformed about life in general. Look whom they
associate with - other rich elitists. That's their entire existence.
They know NOTHING about real lfe.

Wilbur Hubbard





"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in
message
anews.com.
..
Dave the lawyer is an example of the typical uninformed
asa dolt. He's
been suckered in by the hoax posts that tell everybody to
vote AGAINST
H.R. 2550. Jeff, our other resident "genius" also seems to
have drunk
the Kool-Aid.

For your information, dear reader, you've been duped by
totally bogus
information. You've been told to have your congressman
vote AGAINST the
House Rule.

Here's the real scoop from: http://www.boatus.com/gov/


"EPA Discharge Permit Requirement for Recreational Boats

"For 34 years the federal Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has
exempted discharges from recreational boats from the Clean
Water Act
permit system. Regretfully, a recent court ruling
cancelled this permit
exemption. EPA is required by the court decision to
develop and
implement by September 30, 2008 a national permit system
for ALL vessels
in the United States for a variety of normal operational
discharges.

"We have been working behind the scenes with other boating
organizations
to get the exemption reinstated for recreational boats.
Fortunately, the
Recreational Boating Act of 2007 (H.R. 2550) has been
introduced by
Representatives Gene Taylor (D-Miss) and Candice Miller
(R-Mich) which
would protect recreational boats from being swept into
this unnecessary
and expensive permitting system.

"It is critically important that H.R. 2550 be passed and
your support is
essential. Please contact your Congressman and Senators
TODAY and ask
that they co-sponsor or support H.R. 2550."


I hope this helps and I hope it shows the folly of
expecting armchair
lawyers like our Daffy Dave the Duffer to know their arses
from a hole
in the ground.

Wilbur Hubbard

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in news:46eb03f3$0
:

Now, with the passage of H.R. 225,
recreational boats will again be exempt from these onerous regulations.



Can I **** over the side without going to jail, again?

The dolphins do!

Larry
--
Beer - The natural flush....

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:59:24 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

Yes, and if you had checked the headers you would have noted it was
cross-posted to that other group. Doh!

So, Neal, 'splain to me why all your previous posts on the subject of
H.R.
2550, (the first of which is dated September 12, 2007) have the
following
header:

Newsgroups: rec.boats.cruising

So? Does that mean all of alt.sailing.asa should be forever kept out of
the loop? There are boaters here, ya know. And besides, there are
probably half the subscribers here who also post or lurk on
rec.boats.cruising. This is what I mean about your elitism. You think
you are so great and everybody else is clueless. In reality, you're the
one who is out of touch


And only this latest post has the header:

Newsgroups: alt.sailing.asa,rec.boats.cruising

So? Perhaps you could educate me as to how to post it to alt.sailing.asa
without including that in the Newsgroups: line.


Just as I said, your latest comes totally out of left field in this
group.
You're busted. Best you slink off quietly into a corner rather than
soil
yourself further with foolish bluster.

Again with the elitism. Do they teach that in all the Ivy League
schools? Again, in case it didn't sink through your thick skull there
are people here (many) who also read rec.boats.cruising. As for soiling
myself, treating with a lawyer is debasement worse than feces and I
don't shy away from that, do I?


And,
it turned out the OP was totally wrong in asserting that everybody
needed to contact their Congressman or Senator to tell them to vote
AGAINST H.R. 2550.

The OP was Glen Ashmore. Roger Long quickly set things straight.
See

The problem is that you were so intent on blathering that you
apparently
either ignored or simply didn't comprehend what Roger had said--a
point I've
now made ad nauseam.


Again with the cluelessness. The topic of voting AGAINST H.R. 2550 came
up a couple times before the thread you refer to. Get with it, man.
Don't you have something to do such as hawking your wares to O.J.
Simpson to get him acquitted of his latest armed burglary fiasco?

Wilbur Hubbard

"Larry" wrote in message
...
"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in
news:46eb03f3$0
:

Now, with the passage of H.R. 225,
recreational boats will again be exempt from these onerous
regulations.



Can I **** over the side without going to jail, again?

The dolphins do!

Larry
--
Beer - The natural flush....

You can always **** over the side legally from a waste standpoint but
they can probably get you for indecent exposure.

The interesting thing about existing sewage discharge laws the many
people don't understand is the very definition of discharge involves
dumping sewage from a container overboard. If you don't ever use a
container and just **** or **** directly overboard it's totally legal.

If you really want to make the authorities mad when they come aboard to
check your head/holding tanks for legality excuse yourself saying you
need to take a ****, jump overboard drop your swim trunks and ****
directly in the water; use a sponge you grabbed on the way out to clean
your ass. There's NOTHING illegal about doing this, especially if you
caution any female law officers to turn their head if they are offended
by a naked male ass. Hint: always face any current.

Wilbur Hubbard

"Wilbur Hubbard" wrote in news:46eb2d42$0
:

There's NOTHING illegal about doing this, especially if you
caution any female law officers to turn their head if they are offended
by a naked male ass.

Yeah, but what about that lady on the big trawler screaming obscenities at
me over on F-dock? Do I have to notify her, too? Maybe I should put out a
sitrep on Channel 13, just to be safe...(c; (Notice this simple emoticon
of a smiley face, indicating this is a sarcastic remark to your stupid
reply.)

Larry
--
"Because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in
written form and is easily misinterpreted."

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:40:25 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

So, Neal, 'splain to me why all your previous posts on the subject
of
H.R.
2550, (the first of which is dated September 12, 2007) have the
following
header:

Newsgroups: rec.boats.cruising

So? Does that mean all of alt.sailing.asa should be forever kept out
of
the loop?

No. It simply means you were being economical with the truth.

Don't you have something to do such as hawking your wares to O.J.
Simpson to get him acquitted of his latest armed burglary fiasco?

Yes. As I mentioned in another thread and another group, I published a
50
page article last month.

BTW, I'm still waiting for the answer to the question I posted in that
other
thread--when was the last time you used voice recognition so as to be
such
an expert on the topic.

I tried Dragon Naturally Speaking maybe five years ago period. It was
worthless period. It mixed up words comma it put words together that
weren't supposed to be period. It was a joke exclamation point.

Now tell me how can anybody write a coherent paragraph dictating the
punctuation?

Wilbur Hubbard

On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:09:22 +0000, Larry wrote:


Yeah, but what about that lady on the big trawler screaming obscenities at
me over on F-dock? Do I have to notify her, too? Maybe I should put out a
sitrep on Channel 13, just to be safe...(c; (Notice this simple emoticon
of a smiley face, indicating this is a sarcastic remark to your stupid
reply.)

So that's what that means. I thought you had some type of scientific
notation amid your comments, but were just printing the (c: notes
because the (a: (b: and (d: stuff was top secret. (-: Look Ma! no
letters!