"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:32:34 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
said:

I hope this helps and I hope it shows the folly of expecting armchair
lawyers like our Daffy Dave the Duffer to know their arses from a hole
in the ground.

Having a little trouble with the Alzheimer's, Neal? Then I'll remind
you
that no one here has the foggiest idea what you're talking about
because the
discussion to which you refer took place in another group.

Yes, and if you had checked the headers you would have noted it was
cross-posted to that other group. Doh!


And it looks like you may, finally, have comprehended what Roger Long
told
you in that other forum on September 12 was correct, and that your
rant was
off the wall. I certainly pointed out your difficulties with
comprehension
of Roger's post enough times.

Wrong again, Barrister Boy! Anybody can research the thread and see how
you and others were just taking the dire, bogus warnings as fact. And,
it turned out the OP was totally wrong in asserting that everybody
needed to contact their Congressman or Senator to tell them to vote
AGAINST H.R. 225. My rant that leaving it under Federal control was the
way to go because that keeps 50 states from writing 50 different forms
of legislation. The only reason this whole thing is coming up is because
some stupid liberal judge (and former lawyer) legislated from the bench
and negated existing federal law. Now, with the passage of H.R. 225,
recreational boats will again be exempt from these onerous regulations.

I hope this helps. You should be ashamed, since you claim to be a
lawyer, that you were sucked in by a hoax that YOU could have and should
have dispelled instead of contributing to the false information. What
good are you, anyway? But, I suppose you've heard that question many
times from clients you represented who lost their case. Have a nice
day.

Wilbur Hubbard