Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. I disagree..... I can definitely feel a solid hook up with chain. Matter of fact I can see the chain become taut when the set is placed. If motoring I back down for 30 seconds at 1800rpm.... otherwise I drop on the downwind and pay enough to keep the rode straight.... then come about hard to whichever side the anchor is on and allow the momentum to back me down for the set. I get an 80% success rate and the failures are readily seen, felt and corrected by another attempt. I really don't know how you guys have such a hard time with CQRs... It's a great general purpose anchor. I might have dragged 4 times in the last 20 years... none critical. I've seen many a vessel with supposedly experienced crew unable to place a solid hook. I find it particularly prevalent within the Club Racers.... excellent racing and sailing skillsets but no clue about how to secure their vessels to anchor. I've had Overproof set to my standard anchor for 3 weeks through 2 gales without dragging. This was a set in 30 feet of water with my stainless CQR, 100 ft chain and another 50 ft of 3/4" 3 strand. The bottom is a mix of rounded cobble and gravel containing a plethora of scallops. A dive on the hook prior to weighing anchor showed the plow buried to halfway up the shank and a gentle spiral of chain indicating a positive hold in veering wind. Newbies have a hard time because the do not understand fully what is required and lack experience...... the rest simply lack experience and expect failure. Being able to securely anchor your vessel is a very important skillset to have. I believe that Capt. Neal has an excellent set up and knows what it requires to secure to anchor.... whereas Jon illustrates he does not fully comprehend the actual anchoring skills required to safely secure his vessel. CM |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
... JG wrote: You know, I just can't remember at this point. It would set briefly, then on a short watch, it would drag. So, we'd let out more scope and it would set again briefly. We repeated this until we either ran out of room to let out more scope or it was obvious that no matter how much we let out, it wouldn't make any difference. Adding scope, assuming you had a proper amount to start, hardly ever helps. Its certainly no help if the bottom is too soft for the anchor. The one thing it does is give the anchor some time to dig in by itself. Hmmm... well, it's been my experience that sometimes a bit more chain on the bottom works, especially if there's a surg on. I guess it would give it time to dig in. This was a charter boat, so you got all chain rode and fortunately a windlass. I've use the Danforth in a weed/sand area with a good amount of success. If I could actually get it in a patch of sand encircled by weeds/grass, it would generally hold. Aim was important... there's the sand, NOW! g That's why I use a fishfinder rather than a depthsounder. Fishfinders are great... I have one on my Cal 20. It was less expensive than a regular digital depthsounder. I'm not sure it would help with seeing the bottom that much... as it's the cheapest they make. I don't using need anything other than depth knowledge in the bay, and I don't need a sounder to tell me, because I know the area well. When I first started sailing in situations that required anchoring for lunch or sleep, I remember being quite nervous about doing it and tended to put the engine in hard reverse to try and really, really, set the hook, but I soon figured out that was not helping at all. Who cares if you're staying one the boat for a lunch break? The Fortress is nice as a lunch hook because you can set it by hand and feel when it grabs. This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. This is certainly true, although you can tell. The rope rode tends to vibrate; whereas, the chain rode chatters. When we were off Green Cay recently, I showed this effect to one of the crew. In the bay, we drop the hook and just let the boat drift back on its own. Job done. Occasionally, its necessary to give a light hand to reverse, but this is typically when there's no wind to push the boat back. That's about all I do for overnight setting, though we'll test by revving up, otherwise I wouldn't be able to sleep. We used to go crazy trying to back the Nonsuch, which can't back in a straight line. We learned that plow anchors set themselves best if you give them some time. I'm going to be getting some practice backing in the next couple of days. The Yamaha 30 we have needs to get put away in a different spot, and it's near impossible to turn it around after it gets to its side-tie. I've done it before, and it should be good practice. The most difficult place I found was Cooper's Island, BVI, which is mostly grass. The first time I was there, it took three shots at it before it stuck. The second time, it stuck the first time, but we dragged a bit later that night. Since then, I either didn't have any trouble (checking with a dive on it) or elected to take a mooring. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whereas Mooron is just a fool, and I'm coming to the conclusion that he
rarely actually does any sailing. In any case, I was talking to Jeff, not a creep like you. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:qjoWd.15006$fc4.5222@edtnps89... "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. I disagree..... I can definitely feel a solid hook up with chain. Matter of fact I can see the chain become taut when the set is placed. If motoring I back down for 30 seconds at 1800rpm.... otherwise I drop on the downwind and pay enough to keep the rode straight.... then come about hard to whichever side the anchor is on and allow the momentum to back me down for the set. I get an 80% success rate and the failures are readily seen, felt and corrected by another attempt. I really don't know how you guys have such a hard time with CQRs... It's a great general purpose anchor. I might have dragged 4 times in the last 20 years... none critical. I've seen many a vessel with supposedly experienced crew unable to place a solid hook. I find it particularly prevalent within the Club Racers.... excellent racing and sailing skillsets but no clue about how to secure their vessels to anchor. I've had Overproof set to my standard anchor for 3 weeks through 2 gales without dragging. This was a set in 30 feet of water with my stainless CQR, 100 ft chain and another 50 ft of 3/4" 3 strand. The bottom is a mix of rounded cobble and gravel containing a plethora of scallops. A dive on the hook prior to weighing anchor showed the plow buried to halfway up the shank and a gentle spiral of chain indicating a positive hold in veering wind. Newbies have a hard time because the do not understand fully what is required and lack experience...... the rest simply lack experience and expect failure. Being able to securely anchor your vessel is a very important skillset to have. I believe that Capt. Neal has an excellent set up and knows what it requires to secure to anchor.... whereas Jon illustrates he does not fully comprehend the actual anchoring skills required to safely secure his vessel. CM |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "JG" wrote in message Fishfinders are great... I have one on my Cal 20. It was less expensive than a regular digital depthsounder. I'm not sure it would help with seeing the bottom that much... as it's the cheapest they make. I don't using need anything other than depth knowledge in the bay, and I don't need a sounder to tell me, because I know the area well. Yet you can't get a 40lb CQR to hold???.... Bwahahahahahahahahaaa This is certainly true, although you can tell. The rope rode tends to vibrate; whereas, the chain rode chatters. When we were off Green Cay recently, I showed this effect to one of the crew. Chain rattle at anchor off Green Cay... Bwahahahahahahahahahaaa I'm going to be getting some practice backing in the next couple of days. The Yamaha 30 we have needs to get put away in a different spot, and it's near impossible to turn it around after it gets to its side-tie. I've done it before, and it should be good practice. Bwahahahahahahaaaaaa..... Oh you need the "practise" all right! CM |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
JG wrote:
Adding scope, assuming you had a proper amount to start, hardly ever helps. Its certainly no help if the bottom is too soft for the anchor. The one thing it does is give the anchor some time to dig in by itself. Hmmm... well, it's been my experience that sometimes a bit more chain on the bottom works, especially if there's a surg on. I guess it would give it time to dig in. This was a charter boat, so you got all chain rode and fortunately a windlass. As I say, if you had enough, maybe 4:1, to start, and it drags, more won't help. On the other hand, I often try to to set on minimal scope, maybe 3:1, and then lay out more after fully assessing the situation. Of course, sleeping on 10:1 scope is a bit easier than on 3:1! Fishfinders are great... I have one on my Cal 20. It was less expensive than a regular digital depthsounder. I'm not sure it would help with seeing the bottom that much... as it's the cheapest they make. I don't using need anything other than depth knowledge in the bay, and I don't need a sounder to tell me, because I know the area well. Our FF is not that expensive, but it has a fair "white line" bottom read. Its handiest in checking out new anchorages, and especially in Maine where a sandy area can easily have a large ledge in the middle. Who cares if you're staying one the boat for a lunch break? The Fortress is nice as a lunch hook because you can set it by hand and feel when it grabs. This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. This is certainly true, although you can tell. The rope rode tends to vibrate; whereas, the chain rode chatters. When we were off Green Cay recently, I showed this effect to one of the crew. Yes, sometimes you can tell from that - and sometimes I'll put a finger on the line while my wife is backing, hoping to feel the vibration or snag. But you don't get that through a 100 feet of chain to a soft bottom. |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt. Mooron wrote:
"Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. I disagree..... I can definitely feel a solid hook up with chain. Matter of fact I can see the chain become taut when the set is placed. If motoring I back down for 30 seconds at 1800rpm.... otherwise I drop on the downwind and pay enough to keep the rode straight.... then come about hard to whichever side the anchor is on and allow the momentum to back me down for the set. I get an 80% success rate and the failures are readily seen, felt and corrected by another attempt. Backing at 1800 for 30 seconds? You ought to be able to tell with a range if you're holding. I've seen people do the "downwind toss" - it looks slick when it works. But more often than not I'm trying to place the boat within 10 feet of a spot. I usually don't have the luxury of an open anchorage. I really don't know how you guys have such a hard time with CQRs... It's a great general purpose anchor. I might have dragged 4 times in the last 20 years... none critical. As I say, I like to end up in a predictable spot - the CQR felt like a crap shoot. As for dragging, in the 12 years I've used a Delta I've never dragged after setting. In fact, I never dragged with a CQR, I just had trouble setting it and didn't like the weight. Dragging 4 times doesn't sound that great to me. OK, there was one time with the Delta: we anchored for the afternoon and noticed a slow drag immediately. Since we were planning to lunch in the cockpit and relax for a hour or so, and had about 1000 yards to the lee shore, we let it be and enjoyed the changing perspective. We found out later we had anchored in soft spoil from the Boston Big Dig and nothing was going to hold. ... |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Morris" wrote in message Backing at 1800 for 30 seconds? You ought to be able to tell with a range if you're holding. Well a range is a given..... I'm making certain the hook is set and holding. I'll often fire up and back down on a set before turning in just to make certain my tackle is holding solid. I've seen people do the "downwind toss" - it looks slick when it works. But more often than not I'm trying to place the boat within 10 feet of a spot. I usually don't have the luxury of an open anchorage. I can't understand that... I can do it in a mooring field and have. A ten foot spot is the target but you still have a swing radius to contend with after the set. If you are on a downwind approach you should allow sufficent swing radius room for other vessels anchored in that area. The depth of the anchorage as well as the bottom conditions are important in deciding where and how to set... but I'm assuming anyone with experience has already taken these into consideration. As I say, I like to end up in a predictable spot - the CQR felt like a crap shoot. As for dragging, in the 12 years I've used a Delta I've never dragged after setting. In fact, I never dragged with a CQR, I just had trouble setting it and didn't like the weight. Dragging 4 times doesn't sound that great to me. Say what.... dragging 4 times out of maybe a thousand sets isn't bad at all Jeff. I find it hard to believe that you never dragged.... that's just unrealistic. OK, there was one time with the Delta: we anchored for the afternoon and noticed a slow drag immediately. Since we were planning to lunch in the cockpit and relax for a hour or so, and had about 1000 yards to the lee shore, we let it be and enjoyed the changing perspective. We found out later we had anchored in soft spoil from the Boston Big Dig and nothing was going to hold. Ah Hah! ... look Jeff, no matter how good you are at setting hook... you will eventually drag on occasion until you have a system set up that minimizes or neutralizes that possibility. CM |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pretty funny... that's how you demonstrate your "superior" skills??? Backing
for 30 seconds... bwahahahaaaa You're worse than any I've seen here. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:aZpWd.3151$i6.1962@edtnps90... "Jeff Morris" wrote in message Backing at 1800 for 30 seconds? You ought to be able to tell with a range if you're holding. Well a range is a given..... I'm making certain the hook is set and holding. I'll often fire up and back down on a set before turning in just to make certain my tackle is holding solid. I've seen people do the "downwind toss" - it looks slick when it works. But more often than not I'm trying to place the boat within 10 feet of a spot. I usually don't have the luxury of an open anchorage. I can't understand that... I can do it in a mooring field and have. A ten foot spot is the target but you still have a swing radius to contend with after the set. If you are on a downwind approach you should allow sufficent swing radius room for other vessels anchored in that area. The depth of the anchorage as well as the bottom conditions are important in deciding where and how to set... but I'm assuming anyone with experience has already taken these into consideration. As I say, I like to end up in a predictable spot - the CQR felt like a crap shoot. As for dragging, in the 12 years I've used a Delta I've never dragged after setting. In fact, I never dragged with a CQR, I just had trouble setting it and didn't like the weight. Dragging 4 times doesn't sound that great to me. Say what.... dragging 4 times out of maybe a thousand sets isn't bad at all Jeff. I find it hard to believe that you never dragged.... that's just unrealistic. OK, there was one time with the Delta: we anchored for the afternoon and noticed a slow drag immediately. Since we were planning to lunch in the cockpit and relax for a hour or so, and had about 1000 yards to the lee shore, we let it be and enjoyed the changing perspective. We found out later we had anchored in soft spoil from the Boston Big Dig and nothing was going to hold. Ah Hah! ... look Jeff, no matter how good you are at setting hook... you will eventually drag on occasion until you have a system set up that minimizes or neutralizes that possibility. CM |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you on drugs? Where did I say I have or use a CQR?
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:RIoWd.15312$fc4.10673@edtnps89... "JG" wrote in message Fishfinders are great... I have one on my Cal 20. It was less expensive than a regular digital depthsounder. I'm not sure it would help with seeing the bottom that much... as it's the cheapest they make. I don't using need anything other than depth knowledge in the bay, and I don't need a sounder to tell me, because I know the area well. Yet you can't get a 40lb CQR to hold???.... Bwahahahahahahahahaaa This is certainly true, although you can tell. The rope rode tends to vibrate; whereas, the chain rode chatters. When we were off Green Cay recently, I showed this effect to one of the crew. Chain rattle at anchor off Green Cay... Bwahahahahahahahahahaaa I'm going to be getting some practice backing in the next couple of days. The Yamaha 30 we have needs to get put away in a different spot, and it's near impossible to turn it around after it gets to its side-tie. I've done it before, and it should be good practice. Bwahahahahahahaaaaaa..... Oh you need the "practise" all right! CM |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think 4:1 is enough for decent scope... minimally 5 and up to 7 is
more typical. 4 is ok for lunch, even 3, but if it's overnight, longer is better. Since there's rarely room for 10, I've never done it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Jeff Morris" wrote in message ... JG wrote: Adding scope, assuming you had a proper amount to start, hardly ever helps. Its certainly no help if the bottom is too soft for the anchor. The one thing it does is give the anchor some time to dig in by itself. Hmmm... well, it's been my experience that sometimes a bit more chain on the bottom works, especially if there's a surg on. I guess it would give it time to dig in. This was a charter boat, so you got all chain rode and fortunately a windlass. As I say, if you had enough, maybe 4:1, to start, and it drags, more won't help. On the other hand, I often try to to set on minimal scope, maybe 3:1, and then lay out more after fully assessing the situation. Of course, sleeping on 10:1 scope is a bit easier than on 3:1! Fishfinders are great... I have one on my Cal 20. It was less expensive than a regular digital depthsounder. I'm not sure it would help with seeing the bottom that much... as it's the cheapest they make. I don't using need anything other than depth knowledge in the bay, and I don't need a sounder to tell me, because I know the area well. Our FF is not that expensive, but it has a fair "white line" bottom read. Its handiest in checking out new anchorages, and especially in Maine where a sandy area can easily have a large ledge in the middle. Who cares if you're staying one the boat for a lunch break? The Fortress is nice as a lunch hook because you can set it by hand and feel when it grabs. This is one of the problems with a lot of chain: it makes it impossible to feel when the anchor grabs. This is certainly true, although you can tell. The rope rode tends to vibrate; whereas, the chain rode chatters. When we were off Green Cay recently, I showed this effect to one of the crew. Yes, sometimes you can tell from that - and sometimes I'll put a finger on the line while my wife is backing, hoping to feel the vibration or snag. But you don't get that through a 100 feet of chain to a soft bottom. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Engine Efficiency Improvements over 20 years | Cruising | |||
Bush down by 8 in latest CNN poll... | General | |||
Homer Hickam's latest book | General |