|
"katysails" wrote in message ... He turned 9 on Dec. 14.....we're watching the surgery site for regrowth....so far, so good....he has two other lumps, though; one on his tail and the other under his armpit, that we're watching...think those are just lipid type lumps...he still thinks he's a puppy... Duh! You said that big lump on his tail was just his haircut . . . CN |
In order for those children to receive the $15, the original donation would
have to be more like %250 to cover the costs of management fees, etc....There is nothing wrong with taking care of one of God's creatures that you love, be it pet or another human being. Most people who are generous and kind to pets are also generous and kind in charitable giving. People who are mean to animals generally don't give a rat's ass about people at all... "Donal" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message If he goes blind they can always have him put to sleep. Seems like I recall somebody here having a poor little kitten put to sleep because it went blind. Cataract surgery for cats and dogs costs roughly $150, takes 10 minutes, and generally only one clear eye is required for a pet to function normally. You could probably feed an African family for 6 months with $150. Anyone who'd put down a pet due to cataracts is slime. Anyone who would spend $150 dollars on a pet has definitely got their priorities wrong. That money could feed 5 hungry African children for months. Regards Donal -- |
You can't see the tumour on his tail, dimbulb...it's under the skin and only
felt....duh... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... "katysails" wrote in message ... He turned 9 on Dec. 14.....we're watching the surgery site for regrowth....so far, so good....he has two other lumps, though; one on his tail and the other under his armpit, that we're watching...think those are just lipid type lumps...he still thinks he's a puppy... Duh! You said that big lump on his tail was just his haircut . . . CN |
"Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message If he goes blind they can always have him put to sleep. Seems like I recall somebody here having a poor little kitten put to sleep because it went blind. Cataract surgery for cats and dogs costs roughly $150, takes 10 minutes, and generally only one clear eye is required for a pet to function normally. You could probably feed an African family for 6 months with $150. Anyone who'd put down a pet due to cataracts is slime. Anyone who would spend $150 dollars on a pet has definitely got their priorities wrong. That money could feed 5 hungry African children for months. Regards Donal -- |
"Donal" wrote You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. WTF are you babbling about? I have a family and a wife/lover/slave. We have a dog too. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Bure bull ****, Donut. Pure British Bull ****! Scotty |
"Donal" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message If he goes blind they can always have him put to sleep. Seems like I recall somebody here having a poor little kitten put to sleep because it went blind. Cataract surgery for cats and dogs costs roughly $150, takes 10 minutes, and generally only one clear eye is required for a pet to function normally. You could probably feed an African family for 6 months with $150. Anyone who'd put down a pet due to cataracts is slime. Anyone who would spend $150 dollars on a pet has definitely got their priorities wrong. That money could feed 5 hungry African children for months. Might we all presume that you'll revisit this inane, left-wing blather and apply it to yourself the next time you spend $150 either frivolously or for something you really don't *need?* Donal, properly cleaned and prepared, could feed 10 hungry African families for months. g Max |
"katysails" wrote in message ... In order for those children to receive the $15, the original donation would have to be more like %250 to cover the costs of management fees, etc.... I think that you have been subjected to propoganda. There are many disreputable charities who deliver very little of their income to the needy. However, most mainstream charities are quite efficient. The St. Vincent de Paul, for example, spends 90% of its income on the needy. http://www.cdi.gov.au/submissions/19...centDePaul.doc There is nothing wrong with taking care of one of God's creatures that you love, be it pet or another human being. Most people who are generous and kind to pets are also generous and kind in charitable giving. People who are mean to animals generally don't give a rat's ass about people at all... That sounds really nice. In fact I'd suggest that it is politically correct rubbish. You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Regards Donal -- |
"Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong? PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act . CM |
"Maxprop" wrote in message Donal, properly cleaned and prepared, could feed 10 hungry African families for months. g I know for a fact they really like Missionaries.... they claim the meat is sweet and tender. CM |
You need to stay away from the chickens.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91... "Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong? PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act . CM |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com