Statement shows limited experience.

over the knee, that is the very same arguement put forth by true believers as
to why they believe astrology is valid.

over the knee, you know more about astrology than physics. do you believe in
astrology??

JAXAshby wrote:
Statement shows limited experience.


over the knee, that is the very same arguement put forth by true believers as
to why they believe astrology is valid.

over the knee, you know more about astrology than physics. do you believe in
astrology??


ROFLMAO I'm still trying to figure out how you found the need to work
"Astrology" in to a discussion on DR .... it's a given you'll start
screaming "PHYSICS" when you don't have a clue as to what's being said,
in a vain attempt to sound intelligent when you try to give an answer.

BTW I should have said Astrologer, not astrologist.
Also, BTW .... which is it, you just like seeing your name show up with
as many separate replies to a single message as possible? Or are your
thought processes so fracture that you have to take a "brain freeze"
break between your pearls of knowledge, so you send a bunch of separate
junk rather than just one junk - post?

otn

don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.

JAXAshby wrote:
don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn

ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?



don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn








don't let the facts of science confuse you, over the knee. nevermind that
every last physicist on the planet is laughing at you.


Don't let the facts of navigation confuse you, jaxass. Never mind that
every last navigator on the planet is laughing at you.

ROFLMAO

otn

JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn

yeah, that's it. yesterday means tomorrow, green means frying pan and DR means
whatever you want, today at 7:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time when posting as what
the frick ever.


Date: 7/17/2004 7:52 PM Eastern Daylight Time
Message-id: et



JAXAshby wrote:
ah, yes. now we have over the knee baldly stating that "the facts of
navigation" don't follow the laws of physics. over the knee does not give
any
reason for this, but just flatly states it is true.

the very same arguement made by true believers as to why astrology works.

yeah. well over the knee hasn't crashed yet, so it must be true, right?

ROFLMAO

Ahhhh jaxass, you're always good for a laugh!!

You can't argue any point as to what "DR" is or might be, so you go off
running in circles yelling "physics, physics".
You know nothing about applying set and drift or how it may be
determined, so you claim "astrology,astrology".
You might be qualified to navigate in LI sound in daylight with
unlimited visibility within a mile of the beach, but never offshore, as
you've proven you can't even safely round Hatteras with a couple of GPS's.

BTW Yer right, I haven't crashed yet and I've been doin it fer about 45
years .....course, even idiots like you can do it nowadays .... as long
as you have enough spare gps receivers and batteries and don't lose the
signal for some reason..... then again, mebbe not.

Ahhhh well, enough jaxnonsense for this weekend.

otn