Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pray that there is no God, for if there is you will most certainly burn in
hell! BC "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Well, **** you anyway. You and yours and your ****ing religion, which is responsible for more death and heartache than all the others combined. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... God will punish you for saying that. After all, he runs the biggest ISP in the universe. Amen! BC "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Go **** yourself. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bob Crantz" wrote in message link.net... bs deleted |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Crantz" wrote ... Pray that there is no God, to whom? |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You've, as usual, got it backwards. *You* need to pray that there
*isn't* a god or if there is that she's benevolent. Otherwise, you will certainly go straight to hell. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... Pray that there is no God, for if there is you will most certainly burn in hell! BC "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Well, **** you anyway. You and yours and your ****ing religion, which is responsible for more death and heartache than all the others combined. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... God will punish you for saying that. After all, he runs the biggest ISP in the universe. Amen! BC "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Go **** yourself. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bob Crantz" wrote in message link.net... bs deleted |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pray that there is no God,
to whom? Damn! Scotty may be getting funny again! RB |
#75
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jeff Morris" wrote in message news ![]() "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "Bobsprit" wrote in message economy collapsed. Their people were starving (many still are). Yeah. A real testament to that socialism you love so much, eh Bubbles. Point was made. You have no answer. Reagan was just a link in the chain of events. No one said that they loved socialism. Not to sharp, are you? Go back and re-read my posts, you brainless, dickless idiot. I never once claimed that Reagan beat the USSR, only that he was at the helm when the USSR failed. Actually you said: "You mean like ending the cold war on his watch?" That really sounds like you're giving Ronnie the credit for ending the Cold War. Typical conservative - first you make a claim and then within two days you're denying it. I'd meant to say "You mean like the cold war ending on his watch." Came out wrong. I stand by my statement that I never claimed Reagan won the cold war. Actually, if any president should get the credit it would be JFK - he set us on the arms race course which, for better or worse, eventually bankrupted the USSR. Typical liberal: giving credit to a man dead for three decades, provided he was a democrat. g Max |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bobsprit" wrote in message No one said that they loved socialism. Not to sharp, are you? Go back and re-read my posts, you brainless, dickless idiot. You just accused "someone" of loving socialism. Care to post where anyone said they did? Please show everyone you're not a liar and a pinhead. Ooops..too late! Since you seem perceptually challenged, Bubbles, I'll clarify. I said YOU love socialism, which is a fact. My statement quoted above referred to something entirely different, dickless. Max |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bobsprit" wrote in message As to a love of socialism, I believe only you fall into that category. LOL!!!! I never even mentioned socialism in ANY context until you just brought it up! Beam him, Scotty Potti!!! You didn't have to, Bubbles. All your verbal defecation reflects an abiding belief that socialism is the only way. Max |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vito" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote ..... As to a love of socialism, I believe only you fall into that category. Rational, intelligent people (all the rest of humanity) don't buy into such a falacious socioeconomic system. The Craft system gave way to the Guild system when advancing technology made crafts to difficult for one to learn on his own. Then the Guild system morphed into capitalism when advancing technology made tools too expensive for individual craftsmen to own. And advancing technology has been eating away at Capitalism for nearly a century. Automation gradually replaces the workers who both create and consume products, but what happens when automation replaces them all? They cannot buy without wages and there can be no profits without sales; so capitalism will collapse. Question is, what will replace it? Socialism? Communism? Something new? The only thing that's certain is that automation will bit by bit destroy our existing system. Even burger-flipping will get automated. Then what will all the MBAs do? Is this guy for real? Max |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() OzOne wrote in message The biggest problem the USSR had was that it spanned so many countries/republics, all with their own levels of corruption that drained the system and its people. Socialism always breeds runaway corruption among those who impose it upon the populace. Too much power over the people. Even capitalism can't hold a candle to such corruption, and we all know what level of corruption it fosters. The problem is that under socialism, no one is creating wealth or jobs--only spending money at an increasing rate, and the whole mess simply collapses due to a lack of funds, all the while the leaders are lining there pockets, knowing full well the eventual outcome. It's nice to have a dacha to fall back to when the **** hits the fan. Couple that with some of the most inhospitable terrain in the world and you have a recipe for disaster. Much of the old USSR is similar to North America and Canada, that is to say arable land rich in resources. And the oil reserves in Siberia, if exploited, could have provided much-needed funding for the economy. But you are correct in that much of the northern Asian continent is wasteland. 'Commune ism' works in it's original form, but can't in a society as large as the USSR where high levels of Govt are required Communism doesn't even work in a commune, and it's a disaster in virtually any larger scale. I spent some time in two communes in the late Sixties--they were hotbeds of jealousy, dissention, and infighting. Some people worked, some didn't, and eventually the workers got fed up with the sponges and threw them out. Communism is an economic system that works only in computer models, but not where humans are involved. One of the best examples of pure and applied communism was a socioeconomic experiment in New Harmony, Indiana. Do a Google search and look it up. And bear in mind that it ultimately failed there, too. Max |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bobsprit" wrote in message Pray that there is no God, to whom? Damn! Scotty may be getting funny again! Scotty's almost always funny. You, OTOH, just make me shake my head and reflect on the damage abusive parents and drug addiction do to a kid. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation | General | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
The Bush Transcript...well, sort of. | General | |||
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General |