MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote:

Sure, I'm bored Jhm.

Well, he's good for something, then. My thoughts on his list of points
was exactly the same as yours - get a catamaran.

As someone else said, let's see that thing plane or move at 18 knots in
a nasty chop and 30 knot headwind. Isn't going to happen.

PDW

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Wally wrote:

Jim Cate wrote:

Would I be permitted to buy a chart plotter, depth-knot, autosteering,
or VHF?

What's a "depth-knot"?


Some log or other?

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Flying Tadpole wrote:

What's a "depth-knot"?

Some log or other?

Sink-rate meter?


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk/music

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Wally wrote:

Flying Tadpole wrote:

What's a "depth-knot"?

Some log or other?

Sink-rate meter?

Oh. The perhaps he has a depth-wish?
--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Wally wrote:

Flying Tadpole wrote:

What's a "depth-knot"?

Some log or other?

Sink-rate meter?

Oh. The perhaps he has a depth-wish?

Dam dam dam. The "" o this keyboard is't workg aymore, would't
you kow it. A real uisace whe oe is tryg to commet o the most
recet utcase and attemptig to respod to ew sappy postigs.

--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Flying Tadpole wrote:

Oh. The perhaps he has a depth-wish?

Dam dam dam. The "" o this keyboard is't workg aymore, would't
you kow it. A real uisace whe oe is tryg to commet o the most
recet utcase and attemptig to respod to ew sappy postigs.

Don't worry about t - my '' key is flakey as well.


--
Wally
www.artbywally.com
www.wally.myby.co.uk/music

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Scott Vernon wrote:

"Jim Cate" wrote

I'll be here for whatever time it takes for you to come to the
realization that you aren't going to intimidate me or drive me away.



Then you'll die here.



I'm not afraid to die.

Jim



Get
used to the idea that I'm just wasting
everyone's time.

Jim


Yup.

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

I think he's already brain dead. Does anything else matter?


Johnathan, if I'm that dense and that brain dead, why do you continue to
spend your time following this discussion?

Jim

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Jim Cate wrote:

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

I think he's already brain dead. Does anything else matter?


Johnathan, if I'm that dense and that brain dead, why do you continue to
spend your time following this discussion?


Because he's a sadist with a bent to necrophilia. Tell us more
about a Macgregor 100 miles offshore. The local ones don't seem
to handle a five-foot chop very well.
--
Flying Tadpole

-------------------------
Learn what lies below the waves of cyberspace!
http://www.internetopera.netfirms.com

MacGregor 26M - Valiant 40
 

Scott, in case you hadn't realized it, there's no law requiring you to
continue following this discussion. If I'm really that stupid, and if my
remarks are really that vacuous, why in hell do you continue to waste
your time in this discussion string? There are lots of others that you
might be interested in. (Actually, of course, you are obviously
stressed out over your inability to put me down, even with the help of
your buddies. It's just not supposed to happen like this, is it?
Everyone knows that any half-way knowledgable sailor should be able to
put down a Mac-lover with just a few sarcastic remarks. - But I'm still
here and still cheerfully stating my position. In fact, I'm actually
more confident in my position than I was when I came on the ng, since
it's increasingly obvious that you and your buddies have almost nothing
to say of substance. It's obvious that you have given up on citing any
objective issues, and you are increasingly resorting to personal, ad
hominem attacks. You obviously aren't making any progress at all, and
it's obviously getting to you.)

Jim





Scott Vernon wrote:

"Jim Cate" wrote

Really? If I'm that stupid and my notes are that insignificant, why is
this discussion string the most extensive on the ng, with over 400
responses?


The 'ol bobspit ploy, start a stupid troll, keep fueling it with dumber than
**** remarks, then claim to 'WIN' because ''his thread'' has the most posts.
Yup, you're a winner Jim, you and bob****, a couple of winners.

SV