Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:29:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****. Loogy, his 'childish bull****' is sucking you in. Please. |
#52
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 7:33*am, John H wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 8, 5:48*am, John H wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 7, 8:21*pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. *I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. * Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? I'd rather not, but on political subjects? Sure! Ignoring means ignoring. But do your own thing. Not necessairily. If it's boating related, why not talk to him in a boating news group. anything else? ignore... |
#53
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim wrote:
On Sep 8, 7:33 am, John H wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 8, 5:48 am, John H wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 7, 8:21 pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? I'd rather not, but on political subjects? Sure! Ignoring means ignoring. But do your own thing. Not necessairily. If it's boating related, why not talk to him in a boating news group. anything else? ignore... What you have to understand here, Tim, is that Herring thinks he is a knight on a holy crusade. What he actually is is queen of the BORG, trying to assimilate everyone by forcing them to conform to his idea of what he thinks is right. Of course, *he* doesn't conform to his standards, either. :) |
#54
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I doubt one person could run Tom out of anywhere. My guess is that he can only tolerate so much crap and with the drone unit and various associates filling the newsgroup on an hourly basis... it just didn't make sense to waste his time here...especially if he has an opportunity for gainful employment. |
#55
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message t... On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote: I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone else doesn't do the same. Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry. Bingo..... and the award goes to.....Mr Thunder |
#56
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... All this because he wouldn't put up with your childish bull****. ---------------------------------- Loogy, an attempt is being made to clean up this NG. Doing so requires restraint by all to stop the insults, attacks and most importantly, instant, knee-jerk responses to those that have contributed to the mess. Doing so only perpetuates the crap. Please join in the effort. Eisboch |
#57
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 8:49*am, Tim wrote:
On Sep 8, 7:33*am, John H wrote: On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:23:17 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 8, 5:48*am, John H wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 7, 8:21*pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. *I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. * Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? I'd rather not, but on political subjects? Sure! Ignoring means ignoring. But do your own thing. Not necessairily. If it's boating related, why not talk to him in a boating news group. anything else? ignore...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Because harry has proven over the years that when he is ignored, he will mix a little boating in with thinly veiled insults and shots just to get things stirred up again. You might not have been here long enough, but that is a definite pattern, look what he did to chuckies place.. Trolling with etec stories, oversize pictures, and other seemingly "boat" related posts that were actually targeted trolls to Reggie, John, and Tom... Harry and salty need to be completely ignored. Ask Eisboch. When Chuckies place got started many of us left here completely ignored harry, things went well for a while. Harry went through his series of moves. Thunder posting, vulgarity, and eventually found a subject or two that Dick would respond to and sucked him back in, despite our pleas to him. He finally came to his senses when he realized that harry was just shooting ducks and hoping one would stick.. It is all a ruse to get someone sucked in so he can start up again... If you want to try to play his game, you can.. But there is nothing there for you or anyone here that you can't get somewhere else... He has one purpose, even with "Boating" posts, if you read between the lines to the not so thinly veiled trolls.... |
#58
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
wrote in message t... On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote: I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone else doesn't do the same. Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry. Bingo..... and the award goes to.....Mr Thunder Look at it this way...if it weren't for me, rec.boats would be nothing but endless drooling about grandchildren, golf, travel trailers, guitars, cholesterol-laden recipes, the good old days in uniform, and watching JustWaitaLoogy ejaculate. :) |
#59
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "John H" wrote in message ... On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 7, 8:21 pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? This is too much. It's always the other guy. Even Waylon couldn't count up the number of posts you've directed to Harry... or talked about him and yet you pick on Tim. People...this is why we go in circles here. The worst offenders feel they are justified in their behaviour and that others should smarten up. |
#60
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hk" wrote in message ... Tim wrote: On Sep 8, 5:48 am, John H wrote: On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote: On Sep 7, 8:21 pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? I'd rather not, but on political subjects? Sure! Uh oh. That won't make Major Major Major Herring happy. I'm sure you'll hear from him. You know how important it is to him for everyone to jump when he issues orders. Especially now that he's been promoted to Lt Colonel. What rank did Marlon Brando hold in ''Apocalypse Now'....mmmmmmmm? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This is a truly sailing post...see ya'll sooon! | ASA | |||
Catch ya'll later... | General | |||
Thanks for the feedback Ya'll. Check out the sky fix | General | |||
Hey Ya'll | ASA |