Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. Start small...with yourself. |
#32
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don White wrote:
"jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. Start small...with yourself. Bingo. Isn't it amazing how the Seven Little Schitts think themselves blameless? |
#33
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 8:21*pm, jim wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. *I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. * Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. |
#34
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 7, 10:41*pm, Tim wrote:
On Sep 7, 8:21*pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. *I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. * Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Actually, the thing to do is to ignore the offender. If temptation to flame still exists, then get and/or set up filters Or that's how I see it |
#35
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote:
I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone else doesn't do the same. Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry. |
#36
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message t... On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, Mike wrote: I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone else doesn't do the same. Because they can't. They need Harry. Look around, Harry isn't the problem. He *can* be filtered. His cross-posting threads *can* be filtered, but then, what will all the fish do? For a large percentage here, this isn't rec.boats it's rec.harry. That's exactly what harry wants. Ignore him, and it will stop... simple as that. There's no need to "defend yourself" from him. harry knows nothing about any of us. Anything he says is pure fabrication, surely the intelligent here must realize that! --Mike |
#37
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 21:03:42 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. Hell, he has already acknowledged that. Gene's algorithm obviously does not fix the problem. It is a great idea, intended to eliminate OT, but it obviously has holes. One of the historical issues is that "rec.boats" does not have a charter to fall back upon as a reference for conformity of topic or conduct. It's the original boating newsgroup and was started without benefit of a published charter. There is an old "FAQ" list, but no official charter. This is not to say that a charter guaranties civility or even helps, but "rec.boats" lacks a reference for conduct. The problem is not unique to rec.boats however. Virtually all of the unmoderated NGs I've read suffer from the same problems prevalent here. It seems like every one has it's own "Harry". Eisboch And keep in mind that what Harry is doing here, with his crossposting, he is also doing in all those other groups. It is not that hard to filter him and ignore him. If you, or anyone, feel they *must* get into a ****ing contest with Harry, it's always possible to meet him at one of his other groups. |
#38
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:10:55 -0700, "Mike" wrote:
But I might spell it wrong ![]() I just have him filtered... it's easier. I don't understand why everyone else doesn't do the same. Even when you respond with your disclaimer, harry *knows* he's getting attention. That's the problem... he thrives on it postitive or negative. --Mike wrote in message ... On Sep 7, 9:38 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 7, 9:13 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Sep 7, 8:36 pm, jim wrote: It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. We can. It almost happened before when the ones of us left completely ignored him. We could do it again but then he gets crazy and makes some sock puppets or a thinly veiled troll having to do with boats.. I say everyone should have one respons to anything he says, a dot and the words screw off. No matter what he says... Shun anybody stupid enough to engage him, and just let him go... ------------------------------------------------------------- I would suggest forgetting even the Chucky dots or *any* comment. To use them acknowledges presence of the offending poster. Eisboch [The members of this news group have unanimously decided that this poster is detrimental to the group in general. Therefore, this and all future posts, questions, trolls, and sockpuppets will be ignored] ----------------------------------------------------- "Persona non grata" Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But I might spell it wrong ![]() Agreed. Hopefully, Gene will see the light and filter the problem in his 'rec.boats', i.e., Harry Krause. |
#39
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:41:11 -0700 (PDT), Tim wrote:
On Sep 7, 8:21*pm, jim wrote: Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. *I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. * Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. Well, one thing you can do is to remember to remove an offenders post from your reply, then all that people will see is your post. Yay! Tim, are you willing to stop your discussions with Harry? |
#40
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:21:21 -0400, jim wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "jim" wrote in message ... It's so sad to see Tom leave. There must be something we can do to keep this NG alive. A strict filtering regimin to eliminate Krause and any one else who exhibits similar behavior could work. Would anyone like to share any ideas to fix this NG? We could conference over at Chucks via PM if he will allow it. Or maybe we could do it via email. A strictly adhered to filter regiment might work, but many, including me, get sucked back into discussions by quoted references. I am willing to try to totally ignore, if that is the consensus. My concern, in the case of Harry, is that if he runs out of people to insult or listen to his politics, he would just crosspost in an attempt to encourage and draw in new blood. Hell, he has already acknowledged that. SNIP Eisboch I've had him filtered for a couple of weeks but I still see his crap in 90% of the posts here. We have to do something to get rid of him or there will never be peace here. You could get a powerful start by taking away Scotty's computer. He's incapable of stifling himself, and Harry LOVES the attention. He's a troll attractant if ever there was one. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
This is a truly sailing post...see ya'll sooon! | ASA | |||
Catch ya'll later... | General | |||
Thanks for the feedback Ya'll. Check out the sky fix | General | |||
Hey Ya'll | ASA |