Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!



Snerk.

Since you have "made your bones here" by posting dozens of personally
insulting (if untrue) messages about me, I suspect you'll be waiting
quite a while. And since you are posting behind an anonymous handle and
since I prefaced my remark about you by stated it was b.s., just like
your remarks about me were, well...if you had a brain, you might be able
to figure out the result.

Don't forget to tell your sister of your months of lying insults
directed towards me, virtually all of which I ignored. And don't forget,
I have *all* of them saved, along with their headers, I'll be glad to
send these along to your sister, so she can see for herself what a
quality guy her brother is.

Crawl back into the litter box with your alter ego, "Loogy."

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

hk wrote:

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 8:53*am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. *As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. *She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. *She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. *It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. *What more could
you ask for! *And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. *Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Hummm, this will be interesting. Would your sibling be interested in a
guy (TB) who called me a child molester several times? I saved the
posts, just in case... Do they work in CT?

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 8:26*am, wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:53*am, camacdonaldiii wrote:

Howdy Harry. *As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. *She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. *She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. *It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. *What more could
you ask for! *And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. *Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Hummm, this will be interesting. Would your sibling be interested in a
guy (TB) who called me a child molester several times? I saved the
posts, just in case... Do they work in CT?

I don't think she's licensed in CT. But she is licensed in DC and MD
among several other states, so this should be more fun than a barrel
of monkeys!

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 9:56*am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. *But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. *I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. *As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. *She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. *She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. *It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. *What more could
you ask for! *And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. *Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has cost
you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 10:42*am, wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:56*am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:





Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. *But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. *I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. *As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. *She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. *She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. *It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. *What more could
you ask for! *And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. *Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. Do you
think she'll find the lobster boat?

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

jamesgangnc wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has cost
you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.





Old MacDonald has made more than 200 posts to this usenet group, and
virtually all of them are insults aimed in my direction. They're now all
saved, including complete headers. He has about as much chance of
winning a case as the Georgians had in sending the Russians back to
Russia with their tails between their legs.

As soon as MacDonald's sister "contacts" me, I'll send her a portfolio
of her brother's posts here.

I wonder if one of these can be converted to a paint sprayer:


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...age-activa.jpg



:}

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

On Aug 16, 12:04*pm, hk wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. *But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. *She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. *You willingly participated in a public forum. *That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. *You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. *A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. *That means jury trial..

3. *Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. *If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. *Personal feelings don't count. *You need to show how this has cost
you money.

5. *Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. *You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? *Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. *It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.

Old MacDonald has made more than 200 posts to this usenet group, and
virtually all of them are insults aimed in my direction. They're now all
saved, including complete headers. He has about as much chance of
winning a case as the Georgians had in sending the Russians back to
Russia with their tails between their legs.

As soon as MacDonald's sister "contacts" me, I'll send her a portfolio
of her brother's posts here.

I wonder if one of these can be converted to a paint sprayer:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/resmed-m...

:}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Must suck to live life, running for cover...;)

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:33:01 -0400, hk wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:53 am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Hummm, this will be interesting. Would your sibling be interested in a
guy (TB) who called me a child molester several times? I saved the
posts, just in case... Do they work in CT?



You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.

To be paid for damages there have to be some. Nobody gives a **** what
is posted on USENET, at least not at this forum.

Casady

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

wrote:
On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, hk wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.
Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.
1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.
2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.
3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.
4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has cost
you money.
5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.
Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.
Old MacDonald has made more than 200 posts to this usenet group, and
virtually all of them are insults aimed in my direction. They're now all
saved, including complete headers. He has about as much chance of
winning a case as the Georgians had in sending the Russians back to
Russia with their tails between their legs.

As soon as MacDonald's sister "contacts" me, I'll send her a portfolio
of her brother's posts here.

I wonder if one of these can be converted to a paint sprayer:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/resmed-m...

:}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Must suck to live life, running for cover...;)


As usual, your post makes no sense.


What think you of the cowards who post here "anonymously"?

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:33:01 -0400, hk wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:53 am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
Hummm, this will be interesting. Would your sibling be interested in a
guy (TB) who called me a child molester several times? I saved the
posts, just in case... Do they work in CT?


You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.

To be paid for damages there have to be some. Nobody gives a **** what
is posted on USENET, at least not at this forum.

Casady


Uh...I was commenting on JustWait's wasting his time here instead of
working on his medical problems.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 10:42 am, wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:





Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the
reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. Do you
think she'll find the lobster boat?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a blowhard! Give it a rest, your bluffing and postering don't impress
me much.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Don White wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 10:42 am, wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:





Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the
reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. Do you
think she'll find the lobster boat?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What a blowhard! Give it a rest, your bluffing and postering don't impress
me much.




Poor MacDonald apparently doesn't sleep too well at night, and takes it
out on rec.boats. And look at the trash who encourages him: Loogy and
Justwait.

:)

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 11:52*am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 16, 10:42*am, wrote:





On Aug 16, 9:56*am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:

Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. *But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. *I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

....
Howdy Harry. *As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. *She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. *She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. *It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. *What more could
you ask for! *And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. *Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. *Do you
think she'll find the lobster boat?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, I can't WAIT to hear the results, and then watch the dancing begin
when Harry tries to explain why that 36' Zimmerman like lobster boat
doesn't show up, as well as his acreage!

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
m...
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has
cost you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause
your sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is
almost certainly unwinable.


This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

On Aug 16, 12:32*pm, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, hk wrote:
jamesgangnc wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
....
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
....
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. *But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. *She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.
Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.
1. *You willingly participated in a public forum. *That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.
2. *You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. *A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. *That means jury trial.
3. *Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.
4. *If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. *Personal feelings don't count. *You need to show how this has cost
you money.
5. *Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. *You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.
Now has you sister informed you of all this? *Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. *It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.
Old MacDonald has made more than 200 posts to this usenet group, and
virtually all of them are insults aimed in my direction. They're now all
saved, including complete headers. He has about as much chance of
winning a case as the Georgians had in sending the Russians back to
Russia with their tails between their legs.

As soon as MacDonald's sister "contacts" me, I'll send her a portfolio
of her brother's posts here.

I wonder if one of these can be converted to a paint sprayer:

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2...us/resmed-m...

:}- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Must suck to live life, running for cover...;)

As usual, your post makes no sense.

What think you of the cowards who post here "anonymously"?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Gee, I don't know, "hk", perhaps you could ask "JimH" or "warp17".
It's funny that all of the experts agree that you should never, ever
reveal your personal information on usenet, but seeing how you don't
know how to post anonymously, you think it's a great idea to do so.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:44:04 -0400, hk wrote:

Poor MacDonald apparently doesn't sleep too well at night, and takes it
out on rec.boats. And look at the trash who encourages him: Loogy and
Justwait.

:)

My mistake, I thought MacDonald and Loogy were the same person.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:



This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 12:17*pm, RMR wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

I've seen that, too. I believe you're using the correct address, but
the mistake is with Google. I've driven by the same address that
you're using for the Google view and it's nothing like the view you're
seeing on Google. I suspect that the crafty "you know who" may have
discovered this mistake a while back and used it for his own benefit
(ie: to brag about acreage, outbuildings, etc.).

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:32:59 -0400, hk wrote:

What think you of the cowards who post here "anonymously"?

Try alt.folklore.urban where most have been posting under their real
names for years, some for more than a decade. Handles are quite rare.

Casady

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 16, 12:17 pm, RMR wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:03:47 -0400, "Jim" wrote:

This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way could
anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.
Uh, I have it.. and for the record, looking at Harry's place via
google sattelite would suggest that he indeed has the outbuildings he
has posted pics of, and the natural boundries and access suggest that
either he owns a lot of land, or he has rented a house in the middle
of a huge section of undeveloped property.. I'm just sayin'...

RowdyMouseRacing "Crap free at last"

I've seen that, too. I believe you're using the correct address, but
the mistake is with Google. I've driven by the same address that
you're using for the Google view and it's nothing like the view you're
seeing on Google. I suspect that the crafty "you know who" may have
discovered this mistake a while back and used it for his own benefit
(ie: to brag about acreage, outbuildings, etc.).





And camac dumps another load of


http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b2.../cam-dumps.jpg










into rec.boats.


Better put on your cpap mask, schitt-for-brains...your brain is
oxygen-starved.







--
If you want to talk boating or fishing, you're in the wrong place.
rec.boats is the domain of the Seven Little Schitts, who mostly
talk trash. The current members are "Reggie," Loogy, Florida Jim,
DK, BAR and JohnH, and alternates Mike and an occasional
floater.

Try thehulltruth.com or other properly moderated discussion boards
if you want to talk about boats.

Old MacDonald lost the farm.
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:32:59 -0400, hk wrote:

What think you of the cowards who post here "anonymously"?

Try alt.folklore.urban where most have been posting under their real
names for years, some for more than a decade. Handles are quite rare.

Casady


At most of the places where I post seriously, the real identities of
virtually all posters are known to all the regulars. It's the cowardly
little schitts in rec.boats that are scared of squirting their shorts if
anyone ID's them properly.


--
If you want to talk boating or fishing, you're in the wrong place.
rec.boats is the domain of the Seven Little Schitts, who mostly
talk trash. The current members are "Reggie," Loogy, Florida Jim,
DK, BAR and JohnH, and alternates Mike and an occasional
floater.

Try thehulltruth.com or other properly moderated discussion boards
if you want to talk about boats.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:44:04 -0400, hk wrote:

Poor MacDonald apparently doesn't sleep too well at night, and takes it
out on rec.boats. And look at the trash who encourages him: Loogy and
Justwait.

:)

My mistake, I thought MacDonald and Loogy were the same person.

Naw... if you look at the wording I would bet on Waylon Smithers.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Don White wrote:
wrote in message
t...
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:44:04 -0400, hk wrote:

Poor MacDonald apparently doesn't sleep too well at night, and takes it
out on rec.boats. And look at the trash who encourages him: Loogy and
Justwait.

:)
My mistake, I thought MacDonald and Loogy were the same person.

Naw... if you look at the wording I would bet on Waylon Smithers.




MacDonald and Loogy are closer to illiteracy than Waylon Smithers.
Besides, I don't believe Reggie the Coward suffers from severe sleep
apnea. MacDonald does. Loogy suffers from toking too many pounds of a
smokable substance. :)





--
If you want to talk boating or fishing, you're in the wrong place.
rec.boats is the domain of the Seven Little Schitts, who mostly
talk trash. The current members are "Reggie," Loogy, Florida Jim,
DK, BAR and JohnH, and alternates Mike and an occasional
floater.

Try thehulltruth.com or other properly moderated discussion boards
if you want to talk about boats.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

Count me in for some of the fees.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of Anglesea, Sir Reginald P.
Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. wrote:
hk wrote:
.

Don't forget to tell your sister of your months of lying insults
directed towards me, virtually all of which I ignored. And don't
forget, I have *all* of them saved, along with their headers, I'll be
glad to send these along to your sister, so she can see for herself
what a quality guy her brother is.

This reminds me of when you used to to tell us you saved all of MadCow's
posts on CD. You must have quiet a collection of CD's saved up. How
many people do you "save" their post to protect yourself from lawsuits?
It must take up a lot of your time that could be used for boating and
fishing.


WAFA has no idea how the legal system works.

It you're reading this...and you ARE...one has NOTHING to do with the
other. Try a counter suit. Drop a few grand on that and kiss it goodbye.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

jamesgangnc wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!



Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 16, 10:42 am, wrote:
On Aug 16, 9:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:





Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
Some people would make Harry dance just for fun! It's about time, he's
slandered and defamed anybody and everybody who would dare call him
out on his hundreds of lies.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And she said she would do an asset search Monday morning. Do you
think she'll find the lobster boat?

Of course not. She may not even find that 1/2 interest in a canoe.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Richard Casady wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 09:33:01 -0400, hk wrote:

wrote:
On Aug 16, 8:53 am, camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!
Hummm, this will be interesting. Would your sibling be interested in a
guy (TB) who called me a child molester several times? I saved the
posts, just in case... Do they work in CT?


You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.

To be paid for damages there have to be some. Nobody gives a **** what
is posted on USENET, at least not at this forum.

Casady

Internet libel IS the real deal.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Jim wrote:

"jamesgangnc" wrote in message
m...
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the
reality of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly
diminishes your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge
can not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury
trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of
cases in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular
is rampant with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this
has cost you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims
that would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You
could find yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to
do with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to
cause your sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case
that is almost certainly unwinable.


This guy is just blowing smoke. Harry is a very private person. No way
could anyone here get his address or phone number without paying for it.

A simple ISP subpoena will take care of that.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

hk wrote:


You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.


You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
explain it to me.

Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?

Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
is in power.

So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
yet. Can any of you be the first?

TJ

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 16, 9:40 pm, TJ wrote:
hk wrote:

You ought to be spending your time trying to find medical care and a way
to get your needed prescriptions at a price you can afford, instead of
drooling into rec.boats.

You know, that brings up a question that I have that nobody seems to be
able to answer in a way that adds up. Of course, I'm just a simple
country boy who doesn't know much about high finance, so maybe you can
explain it to me.

Medicare is just about to the point where it spends out more than it
takes in, and Baby Boomers like me are going to break Social Security by
the time we all retire if something drastic isn't done - and soon.
Medicare could be called a sort of "universal health care" for the aged
and the disabled. My question is simple: If the US taxpayers can't
afford to provide health care to the aged and disabled, how the hell can
we afford to provide it for EVERYBODY? And how can we do it while
simultaneously balancing the budget, restoring the economy, defending
the country, and switching everybody to more expensive "green" energy?

Stopping the war might be enough to balance the budget, but it won't do
the rest, too. Taxing the profits of oil companies until they all go
bankrupt would be bad for the economy, and taxing just the rich won't
help because they don't have enough money. Most of the money in this
country is held by the middle class. Cutting government waste would
help, but you'd have to cut ALL of the pet projects, not just the ones
of the minority party, and that'll never happen, no matter which party
is in power.

So what is the Liberal Democrat solution? And I don't want to hear about
all the things the Republicans have done wrong - I want to hear about
what YOU'D DO. And those of you who are Conservatives, what would YOU
do? I've asked these questions of several political animals, of several
parties, and nobody's given me a straight answer that made any sense
yet. Can any of you be the first?

TJ

Thanks for bringing some means of sanity to the thread...

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:


Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!

Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

On Aug 17, 4:16*pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:

Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!

Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?

WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.

Good Morning Harry Krause
 

camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 17, 4:16 pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:
Don't bet on it. If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!
Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?
WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.


Ask your seeeeeester to email me, and I'll be glad to provide her with
the copies of the 200+ lies you've told about me here, and then ask her
what your chances are with two or three posts of mine, expecially since
the first one you're bitching about stated I was making it up, to show
you that, just as you made lies about me, I could make up lies about you.

Better still, put on your sleep mask and breathe deeply.