![]() |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch I doubt it. I frequently go out on organizing calls with union reps, and the companies and employees we visit are not members of unions. You call that being *close* to labor? How about *being* labor for several years .... punching a time clock, wearing company issued uniforms with your name on the shirt, working with, eating lunch with, drinking on Friday nights with, etc.? Maybe we have met. I'll share a little story with you. Back when the "Big Dig" was in high gear up here, welders/fabricators were in short supply for the project. The local unions started a less than covert recruitment drive to find and sign up qualified welders wherever they could find them. We had several good, experienced welder/fabricators at my company. The supervisor, "Big Ed" was a seasoned veteran, having done his time as a union welder at the old Fore River Shipyard in Quincy, MA back in the 60's. Big Ed is nearing retirement but still stands about 6'5" and has forearms the size of my thighs. One day someone came into my office and told me there were two union organizers out in the shop. We had a conventional lobby/reception area where visitors were supposed to sign in, get a badge and safety glasses, but these guys had snuck around back and entered through one of the shop overhead doors. I entered the shop just in time to see "Big Ed" escorting the two union dudes out the door. He had both by the back of their belts and was half dragging, half carrying them out. One guy dropped the folder full of propaganda he was carrying and another of our guys picked it up and threw it in a dumpster. They were handing out information on the local union and job offers for the Big Dig. I've been told this is not normal practice, and I believe it, but they tried and didn't get very far. We lost only one employee to the Big Dig project and he returned a little over a year later, fed up. We simply could not afford to match the pay and overtime offered to him by the union. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are.D'oh. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch D'oh. We don't meet on the premises, and typically we respond to requests from employees for a visit. First meetings usually are held at a local eatery where the employees go for lunch or dinner, or anywhere else convenient to the place of employment. Bull**** alert More like the perimeter of the company's parking lot at the end of the workday .... *if* they are playing by their own rules. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch I doubt it. I frequently go out on organizing calls with union reps, and the companies and employees we visit are not members of unions. You call that being *close* to labor? How about *being* labor for several years .... punching a time clock, wearing company issued uniforms with your name on the shirt, working with, eating lunch with, drinking on Friday nights with, etc.? Maybe we have met. I'll share a little story with you. Back when the "Big Dig" was in high gear up here, welders/fabricators were in short supply for the project. The local unions started a less than covert recruitment drive to find and sign up qualified welders wherever they could find them. We had several good, experienced welder/fabricators at my company. The supervisor, "Big Ed" was a seasoned veteran, having done his time as a union welder at the old Fore River Shipyard in Quincy, MA back in the 60's. Big Ed is nearing retirement but still stands about 6'5" and has forearms the size of my thighs. One day someone came into my office and told me there were two union organizers out in the shop. We had a conventional lobby/reception area where visitors were supposed to sign in, get a badge and safety glasses, but these guys had snuck around back and entered through one of the shop overhead doors. I entered the shop just in time to see "Big Ed" escorting the two union dudes out the door. He had both by the back of their belts and was half dragging, half carrying them out. One guy dropped the folder full of propaganda he was carrying and another of our guys picked it up and threw it in a dumpster. They were handing out information on the local union and job offers for the Big Dig. I've been told this is not normal practice, and I believe it, but they tried and didn't get very far. We lost only one employee to the Big Dig project and he returned a little over a year later, fed up. We simply could not afford to match the pay and overtime offered to him by the union. Eisboch Union organizers typically do not go onto the premises unless management invites them. Being invited, however, is not that unusual in the construction trades, especially at the smaller subcontractor shops, because typically the owner of the shop was and is a union member himself, and most unions allow the non-union owners and white collar employees of such operations to participate in the health insurance program. The guys who visited your site were in error. They should have put flyers on the windshields of those worker cars on public property, or handed out flyers while on public property to workers leaving their shifts. Your "Big Ed" was out of line, too, by the way. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are.D'oh. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch D'oh. We don't meet on the premises, and typically we respond to requests from employees for a visit. First meetings usually are held at a local eatery where the employees go for lunch or dinner, or anywhere else convenient to the place of employment. Bull**** alert More like the perimeter of the company's parking lot at the end of the workday .... *if* they are playing by their own rules. Eisboch We're talking about two different venues here. I'm talking about meetings, not handing out flyer invitations to attend a meeting. I attended a union meeting at Panera Bread a few weeks ago. We were not organizing the Panera employees, although a couple seemed very interested. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch I doubt it. I frequently go out on organizing calls with union reps, and the companies and employees we visit are not members of unions. Harry, At one time you may have frequently gone out on calls, but for the last 10 years, you are posting in rec.boats 360 days a year. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. I think I am a bit closer to the labor force than you are.D'oh. Union labor force maybe. Small business employees ..... no way. Eisboch D'oh. We don't meet on the premises, and typically we respond to requests from employees for a visit. First meetings usually are held at a local eatery where the employees go for lunch or dinner, or anywhere else convenient to the place of employment. Bull**** alert More like the perimeter of the company's parking lot at the end of the workday .... *if* they are playing by their own rules. Eisboch BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message . .. Union organizers typically do not go onto the premises unless management invites them. Being invited, however, is not that unusual in the construction trades, especially at the smaller subcontractor shops, because typically the owner of the shop was and is a union member himself, and most unions allow the non-union owners and white collar employees of such operations to participate in the health insurance program. The guys who visited your site were in error. They should have put flyers on the windshields of those worker cars on public property, or handed out flyers while on public property to workers leaving their shifts. Your "Big Ed" was out of line, too, by the way. "Big Ed" got a round of applause and a few high 5's from many of the other shop employees. A good shop is self-policing. Management usually doesn't need to get involved. If successful, those union guys would have wiped out the company, causing many others to suffer. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 21, 12:37*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. * I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. * With all due respect (and I mean that) *I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. *In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. Harry gives me the same respect I give him. Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. It works. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 21, 1:23*pm, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. *Harry gives me the same respect I give him. *Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. *It works. Eisboch- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I do. I give Harry the same respect he give me. The only difference is, I absolutely refuse to cave into his many, many lies. If you and others here want to believe things like a fireboat welcome in NYC, be my guest! |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Union organizers typically do not go onto the premises unless management invites them. Being invited, however, is not that unusual in the construction trades, especially at the smaller subcontractor shops, because typically the owner of the shop was and is a union member himself, and most unions allow the non-union owners and white collar employees of such operations to participate in the health insurance program. The guys who visited your site were in error. They should have put flyers on the windshields of those worker cars on public property, or handed out flyers while on public property to workers leaving their shifts. Your "Big Ed" was out of line, too, by the way. "Big Ed" got a round of applause and a few high 5's from many of the other shop employees. A good shop is self-policing. Management usually doesn't need to get involved. If successful, those union guys would have wiped out the company, causing many others to suffer. Eisboch The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch I agree that union membership isn't everyone. There are lots of Americans who prove their rugged anti-union individuality every day by working for crappy wages without benefits in unsafe conditions. :) |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. Harry gives me the same respect I give him. Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. It works. Eisboch You read Loogy's posts? Wait until I call the Amity Alums! :) |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message ... The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk The "few" guys would represent half of the welding/fabrication shop. We only had about 45 employees total at the time and that included management, administrative, engineering, design, electrical, controls and machinists. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message ... The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk The "few" guys would represent half of the welding/fabrication shop. We only had about 45 employees total at the time and that included management, administrative, engineering, design, electrical, controls and machinists. Eisboch Well, that's a management problem, right? I mean, if American corporations are free to dive to the bottom in terms of layoffs, pay reductions, and benefit cuts, employees should be free to jump with their feet. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk The "few" guys would represent half of the welding/fabrication shop. We only had about 45 employees total at the time and that included management, administrative, engineering, design, electrical, controls and machinists. Eisboch Well, that's a management problem, right? I mean, if American corporations are free to dive to the bottom in terms of layoffs, pay reductions, and benefit cuts, employees should be free to jump with their feet. Good grief. Our guys booted them out the door. Don't you get it? |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk The "few" guys would represent half of the welding/fabrication shop. We only had about 45 employees total at the time and that included management, administrative, engineering, design, electrical, controls and machinists. Eisboch Well, that's a management problem, right? I mean, if American corporations are free to dive to the bottom in terms of layoffs, pay reductions, and benefit cuts, employees should be free to jump with their feet. Good grief. Our guys booted them out the door. Don't you get it? It's not unusual for workers who are afraid of management to behave that way, eh? I'm not saying that was the case at your place, but it isn't unusual. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"hk" wrote in message . .. It's not unusual for workers who are afraid of management to behave that way, eh? Heard that line many times before. You aren't even original. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
hk wrote:
I doubt it. I frequently go out on organizing calls with union reps, and the companies and employees we visit are not members of unions. I hate labor unions. Always have. Twenty-two years ago my father worked nights in a clutch factory, having worked his way up over the years from machinist to foreman. The original owner sold to a larger corporation, and after a while it became time to negotiate a new contract. The factory had been breaking even or even losing money on heavy-duty clutches, and the company wanted to start making light-duty ones where there was more demand. They even went so far as to move in equipment to start making them. Even with the new product line, the company would still lose money if they couldn't cut costs. During the negotiations they said they needed the workers to take a small pay cut. The union, of course, wouldn't stand for it. Eventually, the company gave them a take-it-or-leave-it choice: Take a pay cut or we'll close the plant - and they offered a severance package if the plant closed. Well, with severance dollar signs in their eyes, they voted to close the plant. My father, who couldn't even vote on it because he was a foreman, found himself out of a job at age 60. Just try to find a job at 60. It ain't easy to find a job at any age, much less when you're so near retirement. He lived on unemployment insurance for a year, then another year on the severance package, and started collecting Social Security at 62, three years before he planned to. The depression might have killed him had we not been around to help him through it. He was never the same again. The labor union members that decided to throw away their jobs did that to him. I hate labor unions. Always will. TJ |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:00:31 -0400, Eisboch wrote: But, I read. I agree, years ago it was easy and "safe" to hire illegals. Laws with substantial penalties have been put in place to discourage that practice however and they are enforced. Eisboch Perhaps in your business, but in many sectors, construction for instance, there is a large "underground" economy. Not only are illegals hired, but many citizens are paid under the table. Estimates of illegal immigrants are 10-15 million. They are coming here to make a living. Somebody is hiring them. I realize that and have witnessed it. But, they are not typically "corporations". They are often small time construction or landscaper type businesses that simply don't show up on the radar screen. Eisboch Corporations do hire them. They look at the required documentation and hire them. The government may come back a year later and say the SS number is bogus, but there is no way to run legal quick check on an employee's documentation. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"Calif Bill" wrote in message m... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:00:31 -0400, Eisboch wrote: But, I read. I agree, years ago it was easy and "safe" to hire illegals. Laws with substantial penalties have been put in place to discourage that practice however and they are enforced. Eisboch Perhaps in your business, but in many sectors, construction for instance, there is a large "underground" economy. Not only are illegals hired, but many citizens are paid under the table. Estimates of illegal immigrants are 10-15 million. They are coming here to make a living. Somebody is hiring them. I realize that and have witnessed it. But, they are not typically "corporations". They are often small time construction or landscaper type businesses that simply don't show up on the radar screen. Eisboch Corporations do hire them. They look at the required documentation and hire them. The government may come back a year later and say the SS number is bogus, but there is no way to run legal quick check on an employee's documentation. I think the Duck correctly pointed out the error of my initial statement whereby I left out the word "knowingly". Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:23:15 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message om... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:00:31 -0400, Eisboch wrote: But, I read. I agree, years ago it was easy and "safe" to hire illegals. Laws with substantial penalties have been put in place to discourage that practice however and they are enforced. Eisboch Perhaps in your business, but in many sectors, construction for instance, there is a large "underground" economy. Not only are illegals hired, but many citizens are paid under the table. Estimates of illegal immigrants are 10-15 million. They are coming here to make a living. Somebody is hiring them. I realize that and have witnessed it. But, they are not typically "corporations". They are often small time construction or landscaper type businesses that simply don't show up on the radar screen. Corporations do hire them. They look at the required documentation and hire them. The government may come back a year later and say the SS number is bogus, but there is no way to run legal quick check on an employee's documentation. I think the Duck correctly pointed out the error of my initial statement whereby I left out the word "knowingly". Yes, but did you knowingly know it? |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:23:15 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:S66dnexfQf60wjPVnZ2dnUVZ_trinZ2d@earthlink. com... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message t... On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:00:31 -0400, Eisboch wrote: But, I read. I agree, years ago it was easy and "safe" to hire illegals. Laws with substantial penalties have been put in place to discourage that practice however and they are enforced. Eisboch Perhaps in your business, but in many sectors, construction for instance, there is a large "underground" economy. Not only are illegals hired, but many citizens are paid under the table. Estimates of illegal immigrants are 10-15 million. They are coming here to make a living. Somebody is hiring them. I realize that and have witnessed it. But, they are not typically "corporations". They are often small time construction or landscaper type businesses that simply don't show up on the radar screen. Corporations do hire them. They look at the required documentation and hire them. The government may come back a year later and say the SS number is bogus, but there is no way to run legal quick check on an employee's documentation. I think the Duck correctly pointed out the error of my initial statement whereby I left out the word "knowingly". Yes, but did you knowingly know it? No. But now I know I knowingly didn't know it. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "hk" wrote in message . .. Eisboch wrote: "hk" wrote in message ... The company would have been wiped out if a few guys left for better wages? snerk The "few" guys would represent half of the welding/fabrication shop. We only had about 45 employees total at the time and that included management, administrative, engineering, design, electrical, controls and machinists. Eisboch Well, that's a management problem, right? I mean, if American corporations are free to dive to the bottom in terms of layoffs, pay reductions, and benefit cuts, employees should be free to jump with their feet. Good grief. Our guys booted them out the door. Don't you get it? He will never get it. He's been brainwashed. Can't you tell? Talk to any union lemming and you will hear the EXACT SAME sound bytes. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only
works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else.. You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. Harry gives me the same respect I give him. Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. It works. Eisboch |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
SmallBoats.com wrote:
With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else.. You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message . .. BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. Harry gives me the same respect I give him. Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. It works. Eisboch I'll make you a deal, Scott. You behave as Eisboch typically does here, and not in your usual ignorant asshole way, and I'll give you the same respect I give Eisboch. Richard and I don't agree on a lot of things, especially things political, but I don't call him names. Figured it out? |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 22, 10:35*am, hk wrote:
SmallBoats.com wrote: With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else.. You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message om... BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. *Harry gives me the same respect I give him. *Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. *It works. Eisboch I'll make you a deal, Scott. You behave as Eisboch typically does here, and not in your usual ignorant asshole way, and I'll give you the same respect I give Eisboch. Richard and I don't agree on a lot of things, especially things political, but I don't call him names. Figured it out?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nonsense, read your own proposal here. If I were to accept, I have to subscribe to your premise that I am an "ignorat asshole" for being honest and telling true stories.. While you sit here spewing your constant bull****. Your value system and judgement are ****ed, I am not going to even try to subscribe to this weeks version of civil.. You kiss the asses of those who enable you, and no one else.. Period. If I make a post not involving you at all, say about boats, you post "crappy little boat" threads.. If I tell a true story of hate and intimidation at the union shop, you call me an idiot, liar, and of course worse.. You have never meant or kept a deal here, why would anybody trust you to start now? A couple of posters here that you don't attack seem to be ok with it, I don't believe they don't see it however... |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 22, 11:21*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 22, 10:35 am, hk wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else.. You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:I9mdndcnT6SzBTDVnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@comcast .com... BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. *Harry gives me the same respect I give him. *Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. *It works. Eisboch I'll make you a deal, Scott. You behave as Eisboch typically does here, and not in your usual ignorant asshole way, and I'll give you the same respect I give Eisboch. Richard and I don't agree on a lot of things, especially things political, but I don't call him names. Figured it out?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nonsense, read your own proposal here. If I were to accept, I have to subscribe to your premise that I am an "ignorat asshole" for being honest and telling true stories.. While you sit here spewing your constant bull****. Your value system and judgement are ****ed, I am not going to even try to subscribe to this weeks version of civil.. You kiss the asses of those who enable you, and no one else.. Period. If I make a post not involving you at all, say about boats, you post "crappy little boat" threads.. If I tell a true story of hate and intimidation at the union shop, you call me an idiot, liar, and of course worse.. You have never meant or kept a deal here, why would anybody trust you to start now? A couple of posters here that you don't attack seem to be ok with it, I don't believe they don't see it however... I am sure you experienced whatever you claimed to have experienced at your "union shop." I'm also sure you brought it upon yourself. Remmember, you are the guy who said you've been tossed down the stairs a few times by the police. I suspect your behavior is consistent, no?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Listen here you stupid ignoant ****.. I "saw" what happend, it did not happen to me... But of course you will keep saying it, just to avoid the facts.. wafa... |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 22, 11:21*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 22, 10:35 am, hk wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else.. You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message .... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:I9mdndcnT6SzBTDVnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@comcast .com... BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. *Harry gives me the same respect I give him. *Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. *It works. Eisboch I'll make you a deal, Scott. You behave as Eisboch typically does here, and not in your usual ignorant asshole way, and I'll give you the same respect I give Eisboch. Richard and I don't agree on a lot of things, especially things political, but I don't call him names. Figured it out?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nonsense, read your own proposal here. If I were to accept, I have to subscribe to your premise that I am an "ignorat asshole" for being honest and telling true stories.. While you sit here spewing your constant bull****. Your value system and judgement are ****ed, I am not going to even try to subscribe to this weeks version of civil.. You kiss the asses of those who enable you, and no one else.. Period. If I make a post not involving you at all, say about boats, you post "crappy little boat" threads.. If I tell a true story of hate and intimidation at the union shop, you call me an idiot, liar, and of course worse.. You have never meant or kept a deal here, why would anybody trust you to start now? A couple of posters here that you don't attack seem to be ok with it, I don't believe they don't see it however... I am sure you experienced whatever you claimed to have experienced at your "union shop." I'm also sure you brought it upon yourself. Remmember, you are the guy who said you've been tossed down the stairs a few times by the police. I suspect your behavior is consistent, no?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This kind of outright lie is why only you and Dick can talk about this stuff. To the rest of us, the conversation is useless .. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 22, 11:28*am, hk wrote:
wrote: On Aug 22, 11:21 am, hk wrote: wrote: On Aug 22, 10:35 am, hk wrote: SmallBoats.com wrote: With all due respect, and I mean it, You are blind Dick.. It only works for you and shortpants.. I have tried it, even got to the point where we exchanged persoanal info. It doesn't work for anybody else... You are a smart guy, why can't you listen to several of us here who have pointed out your immunity? I just don't get it.. On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:23:18 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Aug 21, 12:37 pm, "Eisboch" wrote: "hk" wrote in message news:I9mdndcnT6SzBTDVnZ2dnUVZ_tCdnZ2d@comca st.com... BTW, you are projecting your experience and not considering everyone else's. I've worked with and for unions since 1971, I think, and have been out on dozens and dozens of organizing drives, and been involved in campaigns that lasted days, weeks, months, and in one case, more than a year. All manner of employees, too...white collar, blue collar and mixed, and not easy work in the sort of anti-worker, anti-union country this is. Well, if nothing else, this little exchange has been enlightening.. I can see now where and how many of your beliefs and opinions come from.. With all due respect (and I mean that) I think your experiences has resulted in a bit of narrow mindedness. Unions aren't for everybody. In fact, they aren't for most. Eisboch But you've got to understand, if Harry thinks they are good, then that means they are good for everyone, and everyone better damned well get with the program, just ask him. If you don't agree with him 100%, he'll start calling you names and telling lies about you. ---------------------------------------------- Doubtful. *Harry gives me the same respect I give him. *Maybe sometimes a little more. Try it sometime. *It works. Eisboch I'll make you a deal, Scott. You behave as Eisboch typically does here, and not in your usual ignorant asshole way, and I'll give you the same respect I give Eisboch. Richard and I don't agree on a lot of things, especially things political, but I don't call him names. Figured it out?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nonsense, read your own proposal here. If I were to accept, I have to subscribe to your premise that I am an "ignorat asshole" for being honest and telling true stories.. While you sit here spewing your constant bull****. Your value system and judgement are ****ed, I am not going to even try to subscribe to this weeks version of civil.. You kiss the asses of those who enable you, and no one else.. Period. If I make a post not involving you at all, say about boats, you post "crappy little boat" threads.. If I tell a true story of hate and intimidation at the union shop, you call me an idiot, liar, and of course worse.. You have never meant or kept a deal here, why would anybody trust you to start now? A couple of posters here that you don't attack seem to be ok with it, I don't believe they don't see it however... I am sure you experienced whatever you claimed to have experienced at your "union shop." I'm also sure you brought it upon yourself. Remmember, you are the guy who said you've been tossed down the stairs a few times by the police. I suspect your behavior is consistent, no?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This kind of outright lie is why only you and Dick can talk about this stuff. To the rest of us, the conversation is useless .. What outright lie? I recall you stating the police had tossed you down the stairs. I don't recall what problems you had with your "union shop," nor do I care. Everyone has had "problems" sometime in life. Most of us get over them and move on.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nope, they shoved, I caught myself.. This is why nobody else can get into your conversations, you can't be honest about anything.. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
On Aug 22, 12:45*pm, John H. salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:10:50 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Aug 22, 11:28*am, hk wrote: wrote: snipped This kind of outright lie is why only you and Dick can talk about this stuff. To the rest of us, the conversation is useless .. What outright lie? I recall you stating the police had tossed you down the stairs. I don't recall what problems you had with your "union shop," nor do I care. Everyone has had "problems" sometime in life. Most of us get over them and move on.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Nope, they shoved, I caught myself.. This is why nobody else can get into your conversations, you can't be honest about anything.. Why try? Because I represent my business here and when he makes up deliberate lies, distortions, and insinuations about me, someone needs to clear it up. I come here to learn and talk about what I have learned.. Take the wood boat thread for instance.. I have a lot to learn there, but was pretty much unable to participate having to defend wafa's continuous distortions. This is not productive, I gotta' go.. |
For TJ: Health Care Proposals
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com