On Aug 18, 10:46*am, hk wrote:
wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:21:49 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:12:10 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:17:12 -0400, John H.
salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote:

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:58:46 -0400, TJ wrote:

John H. wrote:

Giving everyone $1000 is a good start towards fixing those problems. If,
after that, the problems still exist, Obama will probably give everyone
$2000. For sure, the problems will go away then.
--
** Good Day! **
As I said, I'm just a simple country boy. You need to explain things
more fully, or I don't understand them. Assuming by "everyone" you mean
all 300 million or so Americans, That could come to as much as, uh let
me see... Wait a minute, my calculator doesn't go that high, I need a
pencil... Ah! I get $9 trillion. Sounds like a bargain to me, although I
don't see how it would work. The $600 Bush gave almost everyone only
helped during one quarter.

Exactly where do you expect them to get that money? Should they just
print it up? From what I heard, that would devalue our falling dollar
even more than it is now, and that $3000 would have less power than it
might have. They could borrow it from China or somebody, but wouldn't
that increase the deficit even more? Doesn't sound like a good way to
balance the budget. If I did something lie that, I'd hear nasty things
from my banker. But then, I'm not the government, am I?
Hmmm. I'm not so sure about that one, but we'll put it on the list.
Anybody got any other ideas?

TJ
Where does Obama get the money? From the same place Pelosi or Reid would
get the money. Taxes. Higher taxes. Income redistribution on *a grand
scale.
Ya mean like the $1200 that Bush recently sent everybody? Bush simply
borrowed the money from China. He knows you are good for it, or maybe
your children and grandchildren will settle up...
Bush sent me nothing, and I'm part of everybody.

No, tax cheats who don't file a return, are part of a smaller
sub-group.

Herring is retired. If memory serves, you had to have earned income to
get the tax rebate. Your tax dollars are paying for Herring's
retirement, too.

There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.

Whatever one thinks of Jimmy Carter, one has to admire many of his
"retirement" activities that are aimed at helping the less fortunate.
My father in law, retired, is a lifelong conservative Republican, but he
says Carter is his model for "doing good for others" in retirement.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Part of John's compensation for his services to our country (besides
the low pay) is health care, and other compensations for retirement.
It's just that simple. He worked for it, he deserves it. Whether you
or I agree with it, he knew he had it coming, and I'm sure that was
part of his decision to make the military a career.

Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.



You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment or
satisfaction of your efforts in life.
Meanwhile, keep trying.

Eisboch



That's not it at all. It's the utter mindlessness and laziness of it
that I don't like, as in, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's golf day," instead
of, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's my day to cook meals for the needy down
at the shelter," or tutor some kids, or something like that. Not that
retirees should spend every day helping others, but, if they are
physically able and reasonably well off, I think at least a couple of
days a week devoted to helping those who most need it is the mark of
someone who is not entirely self-indulgent.

My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"

hk wrote:
Eisboch wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..

There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage
in self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.



You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment
or satisfaction of your efforts in life.
Meanwhile, keep trying.

Eisboch


That's not it at all. It's the utter mindlessness and laziness of it
that I don't like, as in, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's golf day," instead
of, "Oh...it's Thursday...it's my day to cook meals for the needy down
at the shelter," or tutor some kids, or something like that. Not that
retirees should spend every day helping others, but, if they are
physically able and reasonably well off, I think at least a couple of
days a week devoted to helping those who most need it is the mark of
someone who is not entirely self-indulgent.

My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"

Why don't you take off 1 day a week from rec.boats and volunteer for
something, anything.

"hk" wrote in message
. ..
camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!



Snerk.

Since you have "made your bones here" by posting dozens of personally
insulting (if untrue) messages about me, I suspect you'll be waiting quite
a while. And since you are posting behind an anonymous handle and since I
prefaced my remark about you by stated it was b.s., just like your remarks
about me were, well...if you had a brain, you might be able to figure out
the result.


Where's the preface referring to *B.S.*?

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.gre atnowhere.com!reader.greatnowhere.com!reader.great nowhere.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:30:39 -0400
From: hk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: As part of my brain surgeon training...
References:





In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2008 21:30:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcc8a160.reader.greatnowhere.com
X-Trace:
DXC=nDbl]7NiPT[PRB2FDFEKP]XKbj2VKD@Zn1RJ3gdIg\[UAS9;W3`OaXn4G_eJ;GelYc_2cUMVf;^[l=[9hj@\_S\9jZa0hGD`Vo^4Q85D=_c^_T?6iUPoPYmAc6=_HUg c[HS[Y=C^\lU0^=Sgk?d=PoE64UJPi?PP@aG1k:OP8aYGQ0^D8gFD FT
X-Complaints-To:
Bytes: 1903
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:878799

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT), camacdonaldiii
wrote:

However, his neighbor, with whom I was talking, knew all about his
labor union connections and his "problems,"

Even the "problems" in Florida ?



Were you aware your new buddy camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors? Got grandkids? Introduce them.


snip

I just don't understand why Gene is putting up with the same old same
old here.. A poster who keeps others on the sidelines not
wanting to fight is not productive.. I know any post I make here is
going to be attacked, I will be called names, and my boats will be put
down by someone who has no clue.. really..On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:03:02
-0400, "Eisboch" wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
...


There's something about Herring's sort of aimless hobby-filled
retirement -a type of retirement apparently shared by several posters
here- that would drive me batty. Not having anything to do but engage in
self-indulgent hobbies...seems mindless to me. I don't even like
"vacations" that last more than a week.



You may feel better if and when you ever get a sense of accomplishment or
satisfaction of your efforts in life.
Meanwhile, keep trying.

Eisboch

On Aug 18, 11:27*am, "Earl of Warwich, Duke of Cornwall, Marquies of
Anglesea, Sir Reginald P. Smithers III Esq. LLC, STP. "
wrote:
hk wrote:

My wife asked me this past weekend if I ever intended to "retire." My
answer: "Why would I want to do *that*?"


Why don't you take off 1 day a week from rec.boats and volunteer for
something, anything.

Hear, hear!!

D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!


Snerk.

Since you have "made your bones here" by posting dozens of personally
insulting (if untrue) messages about me, I suspect you'll be waiting quite
a while. And since you are posting behind an anonymous handle and since I
prefaced my remark about you by stated it was b.s., just like your remarks
about me were, well...if you had a brain, you might be able to figure out
the result.


Where's the preface referring to *B.S.*?

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.gre atnowhere.com!reader.greatnowhere.com!reader.great nowhere.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:30:39 -0400
From: hk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: As part of my brain surgeon training...
References:





In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2008 21:30:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcc8a160.reader.greatnowhere.com
X-Trace:
DXC=nDbl]7NiPT[PRB2FDFEKP]XKbj2VKD@Zn1RJ3gdIg\[UAS9;W3`OaXn4G_eJ;GelYc_2cUMVf;^[l=[9hj@\_S\9jZa0hGD`Vo^4Q85D=_c^_T?6iUPoPYmAc6=_HUg c[HS[Y=C^\lU0^=Sgk?d=PoE64UJPi?PP@aG1k:OP8aYGQ0^D8gFD FT
X-Complaints-To:
Bytes: 1903
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:878799

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT), camacdonaldiii
wrote:

However, his neighbor, with whom I was talking, knew all about his
labor union connections and his "problems,"
Even the "problems" in Florida ?



Were you aware your new buddy camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors? Got grandkids? Introduce them.


snip




Right here, quacker:


From - Thu Aug 14 21:25:33 2008
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys:

Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:25:32 -0400
From: hk
Reply-To:
Organization: Are you kidding?
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Troops vote with their wallets
References:


In-Reply-To:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

camacdonaldiii wrote:


And that would be acreage, not small lot. Hope all goes well
overnight on the acreage. Do you have cattle rustlers in your parts?



snerk

You really are a clueless little schitt.

BTW, I was talking to a neighbor of yours I met at a business meeting,
and he said that not only do most of your neighbors in the Atlanta area
have a restraining order out on you, but that you show up on a sexual
predators list, and it is a felony for you to be within 1000 feet of any
school.

See? I can make up better stories about you than you can about me.


Nice, eh?



See? I can make up better stories about you than you can about me.

I guess I suffixed it rather than prefaced it. Either way, I stated
quite clearly in my first post to "camo" that I was making it up.


Got it?

"hk" wrote in message
...
D.Duck wrote:
"hk" wrote in message
. ..
camacdonaldiii wrote:
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!


Snerk.

Since you have "made your bones here" by posting dozens of personally
insulting (if untrue) messages about me, I suspect you'll be waiting
quite a while. And since you are posting behind an anonymous handle and
since I prefaced my remark about you by stated it was b.s., just like
your remarks about me were, well...if you had a brain, you might be able
to figure out the result.


Where's the preface referring to *B.S.*?

Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ne wsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.k-dsl.de!news.motzarella.org!motzarella.org!news.gre atnowhere.com!reader.greatnowhere.com!reader.great nowhere.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 17:30:39 -0400
From: hk
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: As part of my brain surgeon training...
References:





In-Reply-To:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 13
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2008 21:30:34 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcc8a160.reader.greatnowhere.com
X-Trace:
DXC=nDbl]7NiPT[PRB2FDFEKP]XKbj2VKD@Zn1RJ3gdIg\[UAS9;W3`OaXn4G_eJ;GelYc_2cUMVf;^[l=[9hj@\_S\9jZa0hGD`Vo^4Q85D=_c^_T?6iUPoPYmAc6=_HUg c[HS[Y=C^\lU0^=Sgk?d=PoE64UJPi?PP@aG1k:OP8aYGQ0^D8gFD FT
X-Complaints-To:
Bytes: 1903
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.boats:878799

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT), camacdonaldiii
wrote:

However, his neighbor, with whom I was talking, knew all about his
labor union connections and his "problems,"
Even the "problems" in Florida ?



Were you aware your new buddy camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors? Got grandkids? Introduce them.


snip


Right here, quacker:


From - Thu Aug 14 21:25:33 2008
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00800000
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:25:32 -0400
From: hk
Reply-To:
Organization: Are you kidding?
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16)
Gecko/20080708 Lightning/0.8 Thunderbird/2.0.0.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.boats
Subject: Troops vote with their wallets
References:


In-Reply-To:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

camacdonaldiii wrote:


And that would be acreage, not small lot. Hope all goes well
overnight on the acreage. Do you have cattle rustlers in your parts?



snerk

You really are a clueless little schitt.

BTW, I was talking to a neighbor of yours I met at a business meeting,
and he said that not only do most of your neighbors in the Atlanta area
have a restraining order out on you, but that you show up on a sexual
predators list, and it is a felony for you to be within 1000 feet of any
school.

See? I can make up better stories about you than you can about me.


Nice, eh?



See? I can make up better stories about you than you can about me.

I guess I suffixed it rather than prefaced it. Either way, I stated quite
clearly in my first post to "camo" that I was making it up.


Got it?

Yep, I got it. The message I inserted stands on its own.

"John H." salmonremovebait@gmaildotcom wrote in message
...
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:53:25 -0300, "Don White"
wrote:


"hk" wrote in message
m...
camacdonaldiii wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:36 am, wrote:

If your sister really advises pursuing this that doesn't rate well for
the quality of her advise (sic). Such a suit is practically unwinable
not (sic)
matter what Harry has done in usenet.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Her brother, if she exists, put up a post advising someone not to go out
for a boat ride with me because I "was dangerous." There literally are
dozens of posts from "camac" in which he libels me. Apparently "camac"
likes to dish it out, but he can't take it, and has to go running to his
seeeeeester for help. :)


When that blows up in his face, he'll be running to his mama.


Since you brought them up, how's your mom doing, Don?

--
** Good Day! **

John H

Just fine John.

jamesgangnc wrote:
"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message
...
On Aug 16, 8:56 am, "jamesgangnc" wrote:
Frankly I wish you guys would all disappear. But I'm thinking that your
sister's enthusiasm will start to diminish once she considers the reality
of
her time invested with little or no real possible return. I suspect the
target of your activity could simply file for extensions and delays long
enough to make her lose interest.

"camacdonaldiii" wrote in message

...
Howdy Harry. As it turns out, my next eldest sibling is a very
successful plaintiff lawyer. She’s here for a few days and has
reviewed your statements in “camacdonald is on a list of felons
convicted of crimes involving minors”, etc. She is enthusiastic, even
zealous, about filing a damage action and says that now that we know
exactly where you live, service of process for the action and the
subsequent subpoena for deposition will be no problem. It’ll be fun!
Putting you under oath and taking your deposition. What more could
you ask for! And she says that since the deposition will be a matter
of public record, I could post it to the Internet. Hot damn, I can’t
wait!

James, I'm bragging on family here, so I apologize. But my sister is
very tenacious (especially where family is concerned) and an excellent
plaintiff lawyer. She'll have The Fat One gnawing off his fingernails
like a maniac.

Then your sister is not as well versed in this area as you think.

1. You willingly participated in a public forum. That greatly diminishes
your protection under the laws.

2. You posted a great deal of subjective material yourself. A judge can
not rule upon any of this as a matter of fact. That means jury trial.

3. Historically there is practically no successes for these sort of cases
in spite of the fact that the internet and usenet in particular is rampant
with this behavior.

4. If you even manage to win a case you would then have to prove real
damages. Personal feelings don't count. You need to show how this has cost
you money.

5. Losing such a case would in fact leave you open to counter claims that
would include real expenses incurred by the other party. You could find
yourself having to pay for his lawyer.

Now has you sister informed you of all this? Tenacious has nothing to do
with it. It would take very little effort on the other party to cause your
sister to run up a great deal of time invested in a case that is almost
certainly unwinable.



I think you are missing the whole point of the lawsuit.