On Aug 17, 4:16*pm, DK wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 21:49:17 -0400, DK wrote:

Don't bet on it. *If WAFA has no defense (highly likely) he's done -
quickly. *I hope they allow photos in that courtroom!

Just curious, how do you libel a sockpuppet?

WAFA claims to know exactly who he is.

I'm posting under my own name. So Harry has to prove his statements
accurate, and he will be given as much time as he needs, under oath,
to do so. If he can't prove the statements accurate, then it's liable
of a real person.