Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. He saved his best bitch slap just for you. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote in message . .. HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. He saved his best bitch slap just for you. Isn't it sad that you have to keep grilling a liar to get at the truth. And even when you get to it you still aren't sure. Aren't you the one who got to the bottom of the Coronado Hotel fabrication? You are good. You must be a cop. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. He saved his best bitch slap just for you. Uh-huh. None of the crap you just posted have anything to do with the issue at hand, dirtnapper. Loogy needs your help. Make a home visit. Replace the AAA battery that serves as his brain. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:59:30 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
"Reggie is Here wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. He saved his best bitch slap just for you. I'm having trouble keeping up with this. How many got booted and who were they? Damn - I can't keep up with this stuff. Screw it - I'm going fishing. :) |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 15:37:30 GMT, Tom The Prophet
wrote: On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:59:30 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. He saved his best bitch slap just for you. I'm having trouble keeping up with this. How many got booted and who were they? Damn - I can't keep up with this stuff. Screw it - I'm going fishing. :) Good luck. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 11:37*am, Tom The Prophet wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:59:30 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. * All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. *In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. *Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. *He saved his best bitch slap just for you. I'm having trouble keeping up with this. How many got booted and who were they? Damn - I can't keep up with this stuff. Screw it - I'm going fishing. *:) FL Jim was permanently binned. JohnH was binned for a week. Harry was binned for 2-3 days. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 6:32*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 11:37*am, Tom The Prophet wrote: On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:59:30 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:21:18 -0400, BAR wrote: HK wrote: snipped I got a note from chuck...I know what he did and why, and I support what he did. Loogy will be permanently banned from chuck's sooner rather than later. Gotta love Loogy's support group here...losers all, and barely a boater in the bunch. Bull****, you didn't get a note from Chuck. I don't believe he did either. But, if he did get a 'sorry about that' note from Chuck, then I don't believe even Harry would be stupid enough to broadcast the fact. So, I believe your statement is correct. However, Chuck could post a message here validating Harry's claim and explaining why Harry got treated so nicely. Chuck sure as hell sent me no message. All I ever saw was the "You've been banned" message. But then again, I'm probably not very special. Let's not have you assholes start up a tale that isn't true. I did not say I got a "sorry" note from Chuck. I said I got a note from Chuck in which he briefly explained his thinking and I said I sent a response saying I supported what he did. Chuck put you in time out because you were doing your best to stir up ****. * All I have to save about Chuck's logic in putting you in time out is "BRAVO". Actually, catlitterbreath, you are wrong. Chuck temporarily put me in the penalty box for an entirely different reason. But not to worry: you'll be out on a permanent basis soon enough. All I have to say about you being one of the first people to be put in time out is Chuck knew who was the trouble maker. *In this forum Chuck told you numerous times that you were the problem, and you got your panties in a wad. *Suddenly Chuck went from your best friend to a piece of ****. Chuck is not dumb, but you either seem to believe he is, or you are so delusional you forgot when he "corrected" you in rec.boats. *He saved his best bitch slap just for you. I'm having trouble keeping up with this. How many got booted and who were they? Damn - I can't keep up with this stuff. Screw it - I'm going fishing. *:) FL Jim was permanently binned. JohnH was binned for a week. Harry was binned for 2-3 days.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It's nice to see you instantly protect your lover, but please use some common sense. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
FL Jim was permanently binned. No! Florida Jim was *permanently banned*? I missed that. Well, that explains certain posts of his here. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 6:40*pm, HK wrote:
JimH wrote: FL Jim was permanently binned. No! Florida Jim was *permanently banned*? I missed that. Well, that explains certain posts of his here. I am sure more will come. Loogy/hidden will be next followed by BAR/ Marooned. Mark my word on that. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 6, 6:51*pm, JimH wrote:
On Jul 6, 6:40*pm, HK wrote: JimH wrote: FL Jim was permanently binned. No! Florida Jim was *permanently banned*? I missed that. Well, that explains certain posts of his here. I am sure more will come. * Loogy/hidden will be next followed by BAR/ Marooned. * *Mark my word on that. Hey, idiot, I've never been a member at Chuck's site. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cell phones at sea | ASA | |||
Cell phones at sea | General | |||
Cell phones at sea | General | |||
east coast cell phones | Cruising | |||
Cell Phones on the Chesapeake | Cruising |