Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.


Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.


Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of
charisma, he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role
model for young blacks, especially taking into account his modest
beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.

On Feb 5, 9:15�pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of
charisma, he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role
model for young blacks, especially taking into account his modest
beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sour grapes. If the D's waltz into office this year it's because the
public is already "fed up" with a few other things. But it ain't over
yet. Watch for third party (ies) spoiler candidates to distort the
equation. There is a history in this country of big donors shelling
out to 3rd party players that they think will draw support *away* from
the opposition. No reason to expect this year will be any different.

Anybody running for either party, and especially the few left
realistically standing, will be a *huge* improvement over what we have
had to put up with for the last hate years. Er, I meant to type eight
years. Don't know what got into me, really. :-)

"Lu Powell" wrote in message
. ..

"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.


Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see it
breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black voters
for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma, he's
really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for young
blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn" medical
care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress back in
2010, the White House in 2012.



Spoken like a true observer.

Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of
charisma, he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role
model for young blacks, especially taking into account his modest
beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and
waiting in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say to
them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say
to them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).


Accurately stated after 9/11.

Eisboch

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say
to them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).


Accurately stated after 9/11.

Eisboch


Sometimes, true doesn't balance stupid, and it was stupid of him to say
that.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.
Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.
And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.



Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say to
them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).



Interesting. I don't think Bush has balls or brains. What he does have
is chutzpah.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}
What would you do if you were president? Macho man. Talk about the balls of
a brass monkey; you got em Harry. Geeeze. Have you forgotten your military
days? Or lack thereof.