Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

HK wrote:
/www.gradywhite.com/336/


Actually, in general, what Chuck said is true. Bowriders generally do
not have drainage scuppers but drain to the bilge. This includes the
bowrider gilly was asking about. Bury the bow in nasty wave and you
most likely will sink the boat.


It's not the lack of a foredeck that makes a boat "less suitable" for
rough water.


I could not agree more, it is the lack of a low transom that makes the
boat "less suitable" for rough water.
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 01:49:00 -0700, gilly
wrote:

I would have thought also,if towing a toy behind the boat,then having
weight up front would be better for getting out of the hole.


Trim tabs are even more effective.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:28:59 -0400, HK wrote:

It's not the lack of a foredeck that makes a boat "less suitable" for
rough water.


Lack of a foredeck combined with low freeboard at the bow makes it
very easy to scoop up a wave and bring it onboard. Low freeboard
forward is the big difference between a typical bowrider and a center
console.

To me, that makes a boat less suitable for rough water.
  #14   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: May 2007
Posts: 13,347
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:28:59 -0400, HK wrote:

It's not the lack of a foredeck that makes a boat "less suitable" for
rough water.


Lack of a foredeck combined with low freeboard at the bow makes it
very easy to scoop up a wave and bring it onboard. Low freeboard
forward is the big difference between a typical bowrider and a center
console.

To me, that makes a boat less suitable for rough water.


A good number of manufacturers of center console boats use the same
hulls to turn out bow riders.
  #15   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 366
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

I think pretty much any serious open water center console has a larger
freeboard in the front as compared to a traditional bowrider. But then you
know that, you're just looking to start an argument.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:28:59 -0400, HK wrote:

It's not the lack of a foredeck that makes a boat "less suitable" for
rough water.


Lack of a foredeck combined with low freeboard at the bow makes it
very easy to scoop up a wave and bring it onboard. Low freeboard
forward is the big difference between a typical bowrider and a center
console.

To me, that makes a boat less suitable for rough water.


A good number of manufacturers of center console boats use the same hulls
to turn out bow riders.





  #16   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

jamesgangnc wrote:
I think pretty much any serious open water center console has a larger
freeboard in the front as compared to a traditional bowrider. But then you
know that, you're just looking to start an argument.

"HK" wrote in message
...
Wayne.B wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 05:28:59 -0400, HK wrote:

It's not the lack of a foredeck that makes a boat "less suitable" for
rough water.
Lack of a foredeck combined with low freeboard at the bow makes it
very easy to scoop up a wave and bring it onboard. Low freeboard
forward is the big difference between a typical bowrider and a center
console.

To me, that makes a boat less suitable for rough water.

A good number of manufacturers of center console boats use the same hulls
to turn out bow riders.





Sorry, bub, but I don't do much boating on inland lakes. The bowriders I
see for the most part are the ones based upon center console hulls, as
are the "dual console" boats that offer the forward "amenities" of
bowriders.

My favorite bowrider is the Grady-White 27-footer. Same hull as the
center console and cabin models. Great-looking boat.


The problem with most bowriders is the ride...if you are in any sort of
choppy water, the bow is the worst place to be.

For for fishing, I prefer flat, open space in the bow:

http://tinyurl.com/355t8c
  #17   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,091
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons


"HK" wrote in message
. ..

For for fishing, I prefer flat, open space in the bow:

http://tinyurl.com/355t8c



Tsk, tsk.

Dirty boat.

Eisboch


  #18   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
For for fishing, I prefer flat, open space in the bow:

http://tinyurl.com/355t8c



Tsk, tsk.

Dirty boat.

Eisboch




Yeah, the leaves are beginning to fall and I didn't put the cover on.
But I'm hoping to get out Sunday and will hose it out before heading for
the water.
  #19   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,557
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
. ..
For for fishing, I prefer flat, open space in the bow:

http://tinyurl.com/355t8c



Tsk, tsk.

Dirty boat.

Eisboch



They must have a ban on washing boats.

I am wondering what is that pole in the middle of all of that open
space? It looks like something that would trip someone as they were
reeling in the fish and send them over the low gunwale. At least it
isn't it the stern or you would be sent over the LT into the prop.

  #20   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,117
Default BOWRIDERS- Pro's and cons

On Sep 20, 6:07?pm, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Sep 20, 2:16?pm, gilly wrote:
Hi guys


I'm thinking of selling my Bayliner 2052 cuddy to buy a bowrider.I've
never had or been in one.


I was wondering the thoughts of the members here what you guys think
of bowriders.


In the past,i've had the occasional night on board but now the cuddy
seems to be used for storage and
a lot of wasted space,although great for the toilet use.
I rather like the idea of being able to sit up front with nothing
infront to block the view and to achieve a little more floor space for
friends rather than all sitting at the back.
So, any pro's and cons.I'm talking trailerable 20-22 foot. Does it
perhaps get a bit too cold to sit up front as your going along?,too
bouncy a ride? too wet from splash?


Any thoughts would be greatful


Thankyou
Simon


The lack of a foredeck makes a bowrider less suitable for rough water
than a traditional runabout. If you never boat in rough conditions,
not as big a deal. Several bowriders are available with a
configuration where there are two "consoles:, one to starboard with
the helm and one to port that opens up to reveal a marine toilet or
porta-potti.


No foredeck, therefore not suitable for rough water:

http://www.gradywhite.com/336/

And, of course, open stern ocean racing sailboats are not suitable for
rough water, either:

http://www.open30.org/galleries.htm

Now, *some* powerboats with no foredeck are not suitable for rough
water, but some are. Grady makes a 27' bowrider that can take on the
same sea conditions as its 27' center console. Same hull.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


If you read s-l-o-w-l-y and carefully you will note that I compared
the bow rider to a "traditional runabout" and gave the nod for rough
water suitability to the latter. No attempt was made to state that any
boat without a foredeck is less suitable for rough water use than any
boat with.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ericson 39: Pros and Cons klubko Cruising 37 June 17th 07 06:02 PM
Newbie question on bowriders Matthew General 6 December 21st 05 12:51 PM
bowriders with head Randy Ross General 10 September 20th 05 04:21 PM
VIP pro's and con's Seriola Dumerili Boat Building 0 March 30th 05 08:52 AM
cat rigs pros?? cons?? jds General 4 November 8th 04 03:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017