On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:03:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:42:16 -0400, HK wrote:

I could run my boat for four hours, including some time at WOT and
cruising speed, and also honestly report a fuel burn of X gallons for
the adventure. But unless the information is presented in a standardized
format, it is only anecdotal.

Well, let's do it.

I'm going down to SC in the middle of October - let's set something up
for when I return. Split the cost of the boat trip.

Test the information and compare results.

Tom, make sure you go for a test run on Harry's other boat, the elusive
Lobster Boat.

Well, here's the way I look at it.

I don't give a flying rats a$$ about it.

How's that?

Further, unless I see an image of your boat, I'll assume that you
don't have one either. You seem intent on phantom boats, prove you
own one.

Otherwise, drop it - it's stupid and silly.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:03:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:42:16 -0400, HK wrote:

I could run my boat for four hours, including some time at WOT and
cruising speed, and also honestly report a fuel burn of X gallons for
the adventure. But unless the information is presented in a standardized
format, it is only anecdotal.
Well, let's do it.

I'm going down to SC in the middle of October - let's set something up
for when I return. Split the cost of the boat trip.

Test the information and compare results.
Tom, make sure you go for a test run on Harry's other boat, the elusive
Lobster Boat.

Well, here's the way I look at it.

I don't give a flying rats a$$ about it.

How's that?

Further, unless I see an image of your boat, I'll assume that you
don't have one either. You seem intent on phantom boats, prove you
own one.

Otherwise, drop it - it's stupid and silly.

I really don't care if anyone believes I have a boat or not, I have
never made my boat a priority and created a long series of threads as
"my boat" was being custom built. I have never used my boat as my basis
of comparison to other individuals boat. But if I wanted to, I could
publish many photos of my boat, and get a new boat every year. I seem to
remember both photos and a sound wave of the Lobster Boats horn.

On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:29:08 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 18:03:11 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:42:16 -0400, HK wrote:

I could run my boat for four hours, including some time at WOT and
cruising speed, and also honestly report a fuel burn of X gallons for
the adventure. But unless the information is presented in a standardized
format, it is only anecdotal.
Well, let's do it.

I'm going down to SC in the middle of October - let's set something up
for when I return. Split the cost of the boat trip.

Test the information and compare results.
Tom, make sure you go for a test run on Harry's other boat, the elusive
Lobster Boat.

Well, here's the way I look at it.

I don't give a flying rats a$$ about it.

How's that?

Further, unless I see an image of your boat, I'll assume that you
don't have one either. You seem intent on phantom boats, prove you
own one.

Otherwise, drop it - it's stupid and silly.

I really don't care if anyone believes I have a boat or not, I have
never made my boat a priority and created a long series of threads as
"my boat" was being custom built. I have never used my boat as my basis
of comparison to other individuals boat. But if I wanted to, I could
publish many photos of my boat, and get a new boat every year. I seem to
remember both photos and a sound wave of the Lobster Boats horn.

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?


I wonder which is more imaginary, the lobsta boat, your lake, or Harry's
'filters'?

Tom, if you're reading this, how would you rate those for 'imagination'?

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:13:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?

I wonder which is more imaginary, the lobsta boat, your lake, or Harry's
'filters'?

Tom, if you're reading this, how would you rate those for 'imagination'?

Here - let me speak very slowly...

I DON'T CARE...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:13:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...
SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?
I wonder which is more imaginary, the lobsta boat, your lake, or Harry's
'filters'?

Tom, if you're reading this, how would you rate those for 'imagination'?

Here - let me speak very slowly...

I DON'T CARE...



But SW, John and his cohorts *want* you to care. Caring about their
cares is very important to them.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:13:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?

I wonder which is more imaginary, the lobsta boat, your lake, or Harry's
'filters'?

Tom, if you're reading this, how would you rate those for 'imagination'?

Here - let me speak very slowly...

I DON'T CARE...

Better make that slower and louder. For a former teacher, our John doesn't
learn his lessons very well!

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:14:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:13:37 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:

That's what you say.

I've yet to see evidence of it.

Therefore, it's imaginary.

Just saying...

SWS,
All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?

I wonder which is more imaginary, the lobsta boat, your lake, or Harry's
'filters'?

Tom, if you're reading this, how would you rate those for 'imagination'?

Here - let me speak very slowly...

I DON'T CARE...

GOOD!

On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 00:58:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote:

All I have to say is I have a really nice imaginary boat, and a really
nice imaginary wife and 3 kids, who love to go the imaginary lake.

Just a demonstration of the how's and why's. I have no reason to
doubt you and I respect your attempt at anonymity, but I would posit
that all it would take is some time, a little effort and the whole
world would know who you were.

My larger point is still valid. It doesn't matter if Harry had a
"lobsta" boat or not - it proves nothing. If he made an attempt to
present evidence that was refuted - so what? It doesn't matter. Does
it make him a "bad" guy? No. A little odd certainly, but a bad
person? Does your insistence on using a numb due plum - an alter ego
- make you a bad guy? No.

It's Usenet - there's a lot of bull**** and Walter Mitty types running
around in electronic form. :) Matters not.

Now, what did I do with those blue pills?

The dog ate 'em.