Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 5, 11:59?am, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:54:58 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: On Sep 5, 8:34?am, tsi-yu wrote: They are all semi tame. Not much sport in shooting caged bambis. Make that BAM(!)-bye. More and more people can live a lifetime without actually encountering any wildlife. Chuck, how is it you can go through life being so correct all the time? http://www.hsus.org/wildlife/urban_w...ild_neighbors/ http://www.hsus.org/wildlife/wildlif...ction_programs... http://tinyurl.com/3bqoa4 http://www.enviroliteracy.org/article.php/603.html http://wdfw.wa.gov/wlm/backyard/ Hang on to your hat, Tom. Low flying point just went overhead. :-) I draw a distinction between urban deer, coyotes, raccoons, possums, bears, cougars and other animals that have adapted to life in suburbia, or even the central cities, and their cousins living with little or no human contact. In my opinion, an animal that has lost the natural fear of human beings is no longer "wild", and therefore doesn't behave in the same instinctive manner that actual "wildlife" would. Most people consider a bear, for instance, an example of "wildlife". But if you put that bear in a circus, in my opinion, it's now a circus bear and no longer wildlife. I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to round up urban deer, etc, and try to relocate them into some remote wilderness. I suspect that the tame deer would have some difficulty finding food, eluding predators, etc. Don't know, not an expert on deer or etc. But that doesn't prevent me from holding an opinion that forest animals that move into urban areas aren't really "wildlife" anymore. I appreciate that you may hold a different opinion and that's great- the purpose of a forum is to share ideas and opinions. It's like the hatchery-trout fishery they have every spring up this way. They spend $millions breeding trout in state hatcheries, where for a year or two the fish are taught to associate people with food. Even a fish (one of the dumbest animals around) eventually learns that responding to a certain stimulus (the presence of people) by eating anything the people throw into the pond will result in high times and easy livin'. They stuff these trained fish into tanker trucks and will dump thousands upon thousands of them into a variety of lakes -many of which are *not* really suitable trout habitat). Opening Day of fishing season comes around, and it's elbow-to-elbow along the shorelines of these recently stocked lakes. The Game Department usually opens the season on a Sunday, so some of the fish haven't been fed for several days prior and they sign the piscatoral version of the Hallelujah Chorus when people/food appear. Little old ladies, five year old kids, and everybody in between hauls in the poor confused fish as fast as they can cast a hook. The fish bite worms, flies, marshmallows, spoons, chunks of rubber or plastic, you name it. Among the highly effective products is "Power Bait", formulated to smell and taste exactly like the stuff the fish were trained to eat at the hatchery. People walk around bragging about taking a "limit" of little 6-8 inch fish. The upside is that it introduces a lot of people to fishing, and kids in particular need to actually catch a fish in the first outing or two or they are likely to lose enthusiasm for it. I know of serious fishermen who deliberately *avoid* the annual madness and look for more challenging conditions. Um....never mind. You're both an avid fisherman and a staunch conservationist. It would be interesting to read about your perspective of stocked-pond hatchery fishing. It might be different than mine. The feeding operation is a good observation. There didn't seem to be any empathy expressed by the people for the deer, just training them to depend on people for food. Send the rough tough hunter out into the woods in his BMW SUV- but forget about the "deer call". Tell him to start a fire, cook some bacon, and make a noise like a sandwich. The highly conditioned "game" will walk up to within a couple of feet looking for a handout. Even a once-a-year hunter will have a tough time missing from 4-6 feet away. Um...well....er... Back here, it's a little harder. Maybe it's because our deer aren't trained. You aren't a deer trainer by any chance are you? Sure sound familar with the process- The "trained" deer I run into are up in the San Juan Islands. Despite dozens of signs reading "Please Don't Feed the Deer!" a lot of people do. It's to the point where the deer come running down to the dinghy dock everytime somebody rows in from anchor, and they will walk up to within less than a foot of a person and stand there expectantly waiting for food. Once did feed a few deer at a resort marina. We were having a picnic with some friends and the herd of resident deer wandered over to stick their noses into the food. One animal ate right off my wife's plate when she wasn't paying attention. We tried to show them away, but they wouldn't go as long as there was food available. In the end, we fed them some carrot sticks to distract them from the food on the table and our plates. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:49:42 -0700, Chuck Gould
wrote: I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to round up urban deer, etc, and try to relocate them into some remote wilderness. I suspect that the tame deer would have some difficulty finding food, eluding predators, etc. Don't know, not an expert on deer or etc. Other than Harry I don't know anyone who feeds deer in their backyard. They are interesting to watch but almost everyone regards them as an extreme pest. Deer eat expensive shrubbery and vegetable gardens. They wreck cars and propagate deer ticks. They're nice to look at but not very good neighbors. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:49:42 -0700, Chuck Gould wrote: I'm not sure it makes a lot of sense to round up urban deer, etc, and try to relocate them into some remote wilderness. I suspect that the tame deer would have some difficulty finding food, eluding predators, etc. Don't know, not an expert on deer or etc. Other than Harry I don't know anyone who feeds deer in their backyard. They are interesting to watch but almost everyone regards them as an extreme pest. Deer eat expensive shrubbery and vegetable gardens. They wreck cars and propagate deer ticks. They're nice to look at but not very good neighbors. Some of us have a bit of compassion towards the critters whose habitat we are destroying. Now, if they were Republicans, hell, let them eat cake. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Some of us have a bit of compassion towards the critters whose habitat we are destroying. Now, if they were Republicans, hell, let them eat cake. Harry Krause, Anyone who really has compassion would never feed any wildlife. You have seen all of the posts where the experts review how you are actually hurting the wildlife by feeding them anything, yet you believe you should be able to do it so you and your wife can look and photograph the pretty animals, and can pretend you are doing this because you have compassion. while I know you are too self centered to make any changes that would actually be helpful to the wildlife, here is a short article by the Oregon State University conserving feeding wildlife in your backyard. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/new...oryType=garden Many people feed deer, raccoons and other suburban wildlife, thinking they are helping these animals out by providing food. Don't feed the wildlife in your yard, say wildlife biologists, including Oregon State University professor Dan Edge, and Jeff Picton, director of the Chintimini Wildlife Rehabilitation Center in Corvallis. Providing food for wild animals is not a good idea because: Supplemental feeding encourages wildlife to become dependent on handouts that are not a part of their natural diets. Juvenile animals become used to depending on humans and may never develop normal foraging behavior. They could starve if the artificial food sources are removed. Human foods are usually nutritionally inadequate for wildlife and may lead to health problems. Wildlife may lose their fear of humans and pets, leading to unfortunate encounters with aggressive pets and humans. Wild animals being fed supplementally may congregate in unnaturally high numbers, increasing the chances of disease transmission. To discourage wild animals from foraging near your house, Edge and Picton recommend that homeowners keep garbage cans tightly shut. Rinse cans and bottles for recycling thoroughly before putting them out for curbside pick up. Keep your compost pile fenced from animals. This may not keep all animals (such as rodents) out, but it will help. Or used a closed compost container. Feed your pets indoors, or take outdoor food bowls in at night. Put livestock and poultry in pens at night. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:21:34 -0400, Wayne.B wrote: On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:32:45 -0400, wrote: Another point, it makes the predators associate people with food. Sometimes they get confused whether the people provide food or ARE food. Hence most alligator attacks in Florida. I always have to chuckle at the typical environmentalist response to alligator attacks in Florida. The attacks are always blamed on humans feeding the gators. Their logic is irrefutable I guess. It is pretty accurate. Just look at where the attacks in SW Florida occured. People in Sanibel were treating gators like household pets until that real estate lady got ate. They had a 12 footer that hung out at the Dairy Queen on Bullwinkle. Bird Westall would come over about once a week and drag him over to Ding. The next day he was back eating ice cream cones. I think that may have been the one who ate the lady but if not it was his brother. They had a bunch of them. The kid up in Charlotte was a similar story. People had been feeding that gator for years. For some reason people think seeing a gator eat a hot dog makes them a native. BTW the other way people get gator or snake bit is screwing with one that would just as soon run away. Two years ago, I was wading a nice trout stream in October. Next day on the news, "DEC Captures Half of Croc Pair" or something like that. Somehow, they identified the idiot who had releases two of the monsters into that same creek, so they knew there were two. They said winter would take care of the other one. It sure put an end to trout fishing on that stream quickly for the rest of the season. :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looking like a deer caught in the headlights | ASA | |||
TR - Deer Creek, Cougar Sighting! | General |