Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!

On Aug 31, 8:19 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!

Well seeing that Yamaha was instrumental in the design of the engine
for the Ford Tarus SHO, I can appreciatee that.

In fact,t hat's what I was thinking your post was about, Tom

that Yammie had decided to make an outboard with that SHO sitting on
top.

?:

On Aug 31, 9:19 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!

Oh you love it and you know it

Imagine the carbon footprint you could lay down. All you would need is
a gasoline powered tow vehicle, and a yammy 350, folks here would
start dropping like flies. You could take out Harry and all the Global
Warming lemmings in one clean sweep

On Aug 31, 8:37 pm, wrote:


You could take out Harry and all the Global
Warming lemmings in one clean sweep

Er, you would happen to do this after I questioned Harry about
entering a thread with a snide political remark.....

On Aug 31, 8:37 pm, wrote:
On Aug 31, 9:19 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!

Oh you love it and you know it

Imagine the carbon footprint you could lay down. All you would need is
a gasoline powered tow vehicle, and a yammy 350, folks here would
start dropping like flies. You could take out Harry and all the Global
Warming lemmings in one clean sweep

Well, maybe not political, but I can feel the squeeze coming.

?:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:19:54 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

Something there does not compute unless we are talking twins. That
engine solo should burn about 35 gph at WOT, something like 20 to 25
at 4500 rpm. 52 gph would be entirely plausible for twins at fast
cruise.

"Wayne.B" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:19:54 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

Something there does not compute unless we are talking twins. That
engine solo should burn about 35 gph at WOT, something like 20 to 25
at 4500 rpm. 52 gph would be entirely plausible for twins at fast
cruise.

4500 may be WOT on that big of an engine.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:52:14 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Wayne.B" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:19:54 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

Something there does not compute unless we are talking twins. That
engine solo should burn about 35 gph at WOT, something like 20 to 25
at 4500 rpm. 52 gph would be entirely plausible for twins at fast
cruise.

4500 may be WOT on that big of an engine.

Yamaha is claiming 6000 is WOT.

I'd have to see it to believe it.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:52:28 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 01:19:54 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

Something there does not compute unless we are talking twins. That
engine solo should burn about 35 gph at WOT, something like 20 to 25
at 4500 rpm. 52 gph would be entirely plausible for twins at fast
cruise.

I phrased that wrong - my fault. My only excuse is it was late and my
eyes were crossing.

I was reading a report on it and I was looking at the figures - didn't
account for twins.

However, according to Yamaha, 5900 is WOT - at .9 gph that translates
to - mumble mumble - 34 GPH?

So at 4500, according to Yamaha, 18 GPH?

I ain't buying it.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!


You're doing something wrong:

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/outboard...px?ls=outboard