Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,727
Default Yamaha's monster engine...


wrote in message
...
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 22:04:53 -0400, HK wrote:

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!



You're doing something wrong:

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/outboard...px?ls=outboard



I came up with this (52 GPH)

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/assets/p...n-tri-f350.pdf



A single on a Grady 33 gph
http://www.yamaha-motor.com/assets/p...57-f350tur.pdf


  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,536
Default Yamaha's monster engine...

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:17:34 -0400, wrote:

I came up with this (52 GPH)

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/assets/p...n-tri-f350.pdf


Triples! That would definitely do it.

Considering it is 11,000+ lbs as tested, 36 ft long, doing 50+, not
too bad actually for gas engines, just a little tough on the gas
budget. I have neighbors with I/O speed boats in that size range that
burn about the same.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default Yamaha's monster engine...

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:03:39 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:17:34 -0400, wrote:

I came up with this (52 GPH)

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/assets/p...n-tri-f350.pdf


Triples! That would definitely do it.

Considering it is 11,000+ lbs as tested, 36 ft long, doing 50+, not
too bad actually for gas engines, just a little tough on the gas
budget. I have neighbors with I/O speed boats in that size range that
burn about the same.


I was looking at a Cape Horn and the guy is selling the boat, but
keeping his engines. I was seriously considering that Yamaha 350 as I
wouldn't have to use duals - I seriously want to uncomplicate my boat
life.

I'm not so sure I'm going to do that. Yamaha is making some claims
that I'm not convinced are - er...Kosher. :)
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
HK HK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,635
Default Yamaha's monster engine...

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:03:39 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 23:17:34 -0400, wrote:

I came up with this (52 GPH)

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/assets/p...n-tri-f350.pdf

Triples! That would definitely do it.

Considering it is 11,000+ lbs as tested, 36 ft long, doing 50+, not
too bad actually for gas engines, just a little tough on the gas
budget. I have neighbors with I/O speed boats in that size range that
burn about the same.


I was looking at a Cape Horn and the guy is selling the boat, but
keeping his engines. I was seriously considering that Yamaha 350 as I
wouldn't have to use duals - I seriously want to uncomplicate my boat
life.

I'm not so sure I'm going to do that. Yamaha is making some claims
that I'm not convinced are - er...Kosher. :)




Are you referring to Yamaha's performance sheets? My experience with
them, though limited, indicates they are spot-on. The other Yamaha
owners I have talked to with all manner of boats indicate they are
damned close to their results.

Maybe you should come by here after the Annapolis powerboat show. The
local Grady/Parker dealer puts on a couple of days of water demos with
help from the factories. I am sure there will be several boats with
350's mounted, and you can try them out. Some years ago, at that event,
I got a ride in the first and only diesel jackshaft 28' Parker built.
Cool ride on a really rough day. That exact boat is up for resale by its
original owner. Is it just the fuel burn that intrigues you?

My new boat/motor combo hasn't been tested by Yamaha, so I got a
performance sheet from the Parker factory, which runs its own tests. The
guy who ran the tests told me my results would be a bit better than his,
and he was dead on, including the fuel burn. It really serves no purpose
for these guys to put out made-up numbers.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,649
Default Yamaha's monster engine...

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 07:08:59 -0400, HK wrote:

Are you referring to Yamaha's performance sheets? My experience with
them, though limited, indicates they are spot-on. The other Yamaha
owners I have talked to with all manner of boats indicate they are
damned close to their results.


Hmmm- I'll have to take a closer look.

I might take you up on that Anapolis thing.


  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
Default Yamaha's monster engine...

have heard it's 650lbs!


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
Yamaha is claiming .9 mpg cruise (4500 rpm) on it's V-8 350 WOT.

Hmmmm....52 GPH?

EEEWWWWWWW!!!!!!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Monster Smackdown! Capt. Rob ASA 2 June 28th 07 06:04 PM
Monster Skipper General 2 October 12th 05 05:58 PM
Monster waves Rick ASA 58 December 6th 03 12:20 AM
Die Monster Die!!! Bobsprit ASA 71 August 11th 03 11:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017