Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
trucks (was Sold the Scout - new twist)
Eisboch wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Speaking of diesel trucks, one of my ex-pat retiree buddies, who lives in Costa Rica, just bought for $18,000, a very nice four-seater Kia diesel pickup truck. Not a model sold in this country. I've been half thinking of trading in the F-350 on something else, but I don't know what to get. I originally got it to tow a big, 5th wheel RV that we used once. I occasionally still tow trailers ... the heaviest being a loaded car trailer ... but I really don't need an F-350 to do that. There's just nothing out there that has caught my eye. I'll avoid diesel Fords until they permanently extinguish the tailpipe fires. (although I understand that their new, 6.4L diesel is quite the performer.) Eisboch Tailpipe fires? You know, I don't really keep track of all these strange happenings with ford diesel trucks. You sure seem to have had some interesting happenings with that vehicle. Maybe I should lower my standing offer of $1000 for that truck of yours... That's $1000 cash... |
#32
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
trucks (was Sold the Scout - new twist)
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tailpipe fires? You know, I don't really keep track of all these strange happenings with ford diesel trucks. You sure seem to have had some interesting happenings with that vehicle. Maybe I should lower my standing offer of $1000 for that truck of yours... That's $1000 cash... The tailpipe fires are occurring on the new models equipped with the EPA required particulate filter. Apparently the filters are routinely and automatically heated to a very high temperature to burn off accumulated soot or something. All new diesel powered trucks have this system ... GM and Dodge included. In the case of Ford, there has already been a recall due to documented cases of unburned fuel or something catching fire in the filter and blowing flames out of the tailpipe. There's a You Tube video of this happening somewhere on the 'net. Eisboch |
#33
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"RJSmithers" wrote in message ... Whenever non-attorney's give you free advice, realize it is worth exactly what you have paid for it. You would not be responsible for any damages or have any more liability than if someone stole your car and had an accident, even if it was a fatal accident. Probably, however Admiralty law is often different than common law. I am not an expert, but it's something about prior liabilities follow the boat, not the past owner. There was a case a few years back where the owner of a boat had caused damage to a restricted sea grass area or reef or something. He subsequently sold the boat. The environmental guys eventually tracked the offending boat down and the new owner .... who knew nothing of the event ..... was held financially responsible. He fought it and got the fine reduced considerably, but still had to pay something like 20K if I recall the story correctly. Eisboch |
#34
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"Eisboch" wrote in message . .. "RJSmithers" wrote in message ... Whenever non-attorney's give you free advice, realize it is worth exactly what you have paid for it. You would not be responsible for any damages or have any more liability than if someone stole your car and had an accident, even if it was a fatal accident. Probably, however Admiralty law is often different than common law. I am not an expert, but it's something about prior liabilities follow the boat, not the past owner. There was a case a few years back where the owner of a boat had caused damage to a restricted sea grass area or reef or something. He subsequently sold the boat. The environmental guys eventually tracked the offending boat down and the new owner .... who knew nothing of the event .... was held financially responsible. He fought it and got the fine reduced considerably, but still had to pay something like 20K if I recall the story correctly. I wonder if things are different if the boat is USCG documented rather than just registered with the state? Isn't documentation akin to title insurance? |
#35
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"Eisboch" wrote in message . .. "RJSmithers" wrote in message ... You would not be responsible for any damages or have any more liability than if someone stole your car and had an accident, even if it was a fatal accident. Whenever non-attorney's give you free advice, realize it is worth exactly what you have paid for it. |
#36
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Eisboch" wrote in message . .. Probably, however Admiralty law is often different than common law. I am not an expert, but it's something about prior liabilities follow the boat, not the past owner. There was a case a few years back where the owner of a boat had caused damage to a restricted sea grass area or reef or something. He subsequently sold the boat. The environmental guys eventually tracked the offending boat down and the new owner .... who knew nothing of the event .... was held financially responsible. He fought it and got the fine reduced considerably, but still had to pay something like 20K if I recall the story correctly. I wonder if things are different if the boat is USCG documented rather than just registered with the state? Isn't documentation akin to title insurance? I don't know. In the case I described the boat was a big one and I am sure it was documented. Eisboch |
#37
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"Eisboch" wrote in message . .. "D.Duck" wrote in message ... I emailed the guy advertising "your" boat on Craig's List. I asked him if it was the same rig with the exact same pictures that is advertised on YachtWorld.com. Funny thing, no reply. 8) I also emailed him at the address he originally contacted me with. Surprise ... no answer. I have his phone number .... but what's the point .... what's done is done. If he's a dealer, which I now suspect, he didn't do anything illegal. I think he was a bit dishonest and shady in the manner in which he represented himself to me but I have to ask myself this: If he had been up front and told me he was a dealer and intended to resell the boat the boat, would it have made any difference to me? The answer is no. He paid my asking price. I think the only thing that bugs me is the fact that I think I was more honest in the description of the boat's condition and history in the original listing and on the referenced link to my website. On the other hand, he may perform all the service and maintenance issues the boat and engine require before selling it. One of the other interested parties that responded to my original listing ... in fact, the one who later discovered and informed me of the boat being listed again on the Providence Craigslist made an offer to him. He worded his offer as follows: "I'll give you 500 bucks more than what you paid for it, $12,500." Eisboch Was he dishonest in his dealing with you, in my opinion no. What gets me, his craigslist ad is very misleading and dishonest by representing the boat he is selling by using pictures of another boat. Did yours even have the ladder on the transom? Just to be a pain in the rear I email the folks at yachtworld.com with the link to the CraigsList ad. Someone in YW sales responded to me that they would try to contact him. Next time you have a deal like this, please let me know. 80 |
#38
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
On Mar 30, 6:26�am, "JimH" wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:15:26 -0400, Eisboch penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: If he's a dealer, which I now suspect, he didn't do anything illegal. There seems to be way more cloak-and dagger stuff going on here for something not to be borderline crooked, if not entirely illegal. Trust me, as a buyer, I got on the wrong end of one of these deals and you don't want to go there..... If he sells the boat (with whatever representations he deems appropriate) and pulls a disappearing act, the two signers of the paperwork are likely left to duke it out..... You and Whomever.... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats Yep. *I would suggest that Richard head down to the brokers place ASAP and force him to sign the title as the buyer. An open title is never a good thing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If the law in that state is the same as the law in Washington, (likely so, they are pretty uniform) the dealer cannot be forced to sign the title as buyer. Dealer's "hold title" rather than "take title". What Eisboch *should* do, if his state is like WA, is file a "Seller's Report of Sale". This document goes into the Department of Licensing and substantiates that the boat was sold on March XX, 2007 to Joe Doaks. This can be critically important. Let's say that before the ultimate buyer gets around to putting the title in his name he takes the boat out for its maiden voyage, does some dumb newbie thing, and badly injures somebody or worse. Let's say he flees the scene. When the authorities start tacking down the ownership of the boat, the last guy they find of record is.......guess who. Not a pretty picture. It will probably cost as much as the boat sold for to pay a lawyer to straigten the whole mess out. Maybe more. If the Seller's Report of Sale is filed, the authorities will find *that*, instead of Eisboch's title, as the last activity. Very important. It sounds like the guy wrote a personal check, or Eisboch would have known that he sold to XYZ Boat Dealer. In most states, that's co- mingling of personal and business funds. In some states that would cost him his license. In a lot of states it is also illegal not to disclose to a buyer or seller that you are a dealer or broker, but I can't say in this case. Tempting as it might be to "go after" this guy, remember that he showed up as promised, paid the asking price without quibbling, and that his check ultimately proved to be good at the bank. He did business on the seller's terms all the way, and performed as promised. It's no crime simply to be a dealer. |
#39
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
trucks (was Sold the Scout - new twist)
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Speaking of diesel trucks, one of my ex-pat retiree buddies, who lives in Costa Rica, just bought for $18,000, a very nice four-seater Kia diesel pickup truck. Not a model sold in this country. I've been half thinking of trading in the F-350 on something else, but I don't know what to get. I originally got it to tow a big, 5th wheel RV that we used once. I occasionally still tow trailers ... the heaviest being a loaded car trailer ... but I really don't need an F-350 to do that. There's just nothing out there that has caught my eye. I'll avoid diesel Fords until they permanently extinguish the tailpipe fires. (although I understand that their new, 6.4L diesel is quite the performer.) Eisboch Tailpipe fires? You know, I don't really keep track of all these strange happenings with ford diesel trucks. You sure seem to have had some interesting happenings with that vehicle. Maybe I should lower my standing offer of $1000 for that truck of yours... That's $1000 cash... Then you'll advertise in on craigslist.com for the true value. 8) |
#40
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Sold the Scout - new twist
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... snip... It's no crime simply to be a dealer. Yes but...they are a shady bunch! ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sold the Scout | General | |||
Scout messed up! | ASA | |||
Last remaining White Star Line vessel to be sold for scrap | Tall Ships | |||
used sail material needed for scout projects | Boat Building | |||
FS: O'Day in NY, SOLD | Marketplace |