JimH wrote:
I will not post the latest one unless he asks me to as I will respect his
privacy.

This is boy is indeed obsessed with me (even though I KF'd him and
previously asked him not to email me) and needs some serious psychiatric
help.

Can you say 'Stalking'?

Harry.......can your wife suggest a therapist in his area?



Wow, when did sending an email become stalking? I probably send out
10-20 emails a day, I would hate to have the police bust in my door for
"Stalking".

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

On Feb 12, 4:42�pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"


For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. *If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.


Wise counsel.

On Feb 12, 8:12 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"




For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

Done...........some 6 months ago.

Perhaps John Herring has a reading comprehension problem.

JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:12 pm, "Chuck Gould" wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"




For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.

Done...........some 6 months ago.

Perhaps John Herring has a reading comprehension problem.


If someone really doesn't want to read anyone's email, all he has to do
is filter that individual. You won't see or even know the email was
sent, but then, you wouldn't be able to pretend you are being "Stalked".
There is no logical reason to start a thread a new thread to express
your concern about "Stalking".

Harry was last person JimH thought was stalking him. That "Stalking"
claim lasted for years, and was injected into just about every thread in
the NG. Hopefully this claim of "Stalking" will have a much shorter
life.

Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42�pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. �If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

But but...

It's funny...

On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.

Wise counsel.

But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.
But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

I'm sorry Jim, but it is hysterical.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.
But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

I'm sorry Jim, but it is hysterical.

Funny, not hysterical.

Calif Bill wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.
But but...

It's funny...
Actually it isn't.
I'm sorry Jim, but it is hysterical.

Funny, not hysterical.

Hysterically funny?

On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 02:11:32 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
JimH wrote:
On Feb 12, 8:27 pm, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Feb 12, 4:42?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"

For what it is worth, it probably makes more sense if all of us used
email for silly fights, instead of cluttering up the NG. ?If JimH
doesn't want JohnH to email him, it would make more sense to make that
request via email, instead of using the NG.
Wise counsel.
But but...

It's funny...

Actually it isn't.

I'm sorry Jim, but it is hysterical.

Funny, not hysterical.


Hysterically funny...?
--
***** Have a super day! *****

John H