Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I need binoculars for my little boat. I have been told the Steiner
Commander V model is excellent, and it costs about 700 eurobucks. For example it would have these features: -outstanding brightness for twilight use -rangefinder reticle -autofocus -nitrogen filled, the nitrogen won't leak out and there is a guarantee for 10 years they will not get fogged in any conditions -shockproof - drop them and the prisms still won't move -really waterproof http://www.steiner-binoculars.com/bi...arine/392.html The high price however makes me doubt whether this is a good investment at this point. There are some very good marine binoculars for around 200 bucks with similar specs (nitrogen filled etc). The Fujinon models have been praised: http://fujinon.binoculars.com/series...lars-2501.html The question is which of these would be worthwhile - Fujinon, maybe the cheaper Steiners (eg. Observer), others? How much of the above features would I give up by not going for the Commanders right away? Would I get around with the cheaper ones for the few first years, and should they last for years to come after that? I would prefer a model with an integrated compass. Or alternatively I could go for compact generic travel binoculars at first (7x25 or 8x20 or something like that for maybe just 100 bucks), then upgrade in 1-3 years to a real binocular, and use these as the 2nd boat binoculars and just generic binoculars everywhere. Would this be a bad idea - ie. are these kinds of binoculars of any use while boating - for now I'd stick mostly to daylight conditions with fair visibility anyway? Risto |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Harry Krause wrote: Steiner makes waterproof binocs in 8x20, or maybe 8x30. Those might be used more successfully on a small boat. Wouldn't a heavy magnification (8x) however make the movement of the boat more pronounced than with the standard 7x - the field of view would appear to bob and heave more? (Following your advice one might go for say 6x18 binoculars from Helios, which are waterproof and dirt cheap...) Risto |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Varis wrote: I need binoculars for my little boat. I have been told the Steiner Commander V model is excellent, and it costs about 700 eurobucks. For example it would have these features: -outstanding brightness for twilight use -rangefinder reticle -autofocus -nitrogen filled, the nitrogen won't leak out and there is a guarantee for 10 years they will not get fogged in any conditions -shockproof - drop them and the prisms still won't move -really waterproof http://www.steiner-binoculars.com/bi...arine/392.html The high price however makes me doubt whether this is a good investment at this point. There are some very good marine binoculars for around 200 bucks with similar specs (nitrogen filled etc). The Fujinon models have been praised: http://fujinon.binoculars.com/series...lars-2501.html The question is which of these would be worthwhile - Fujinon, maybe the cheaper Steiners (eg. Observer), others? How much of the above features would I give up by not going for the Commanders right away? Would I get around with the cheaper ones for the few first years, and should they last for years to come after that? I would prefer a model with an integrated compass. Or alternatively I could go for compact generic travel binoculars at first (7x25 or 8x20 or something like that for maybe just 100 bucks), then upgrade in 1-3 years to a real binocular, and use these as the 2nd boat binoculars and just generic binoculars everywhere. Would this be a bad idea - ie. are these kinds of binoculars of any use while boating - for now I'd stick mostly to daylight conditions with fair visibility anyway? Risto I've got a wonderful pair of marine binocs that cost around $300 US many years ago. I can't image why the typical boater would really need something beyond this medium price range. I'd get some good quality, genuine marine binoculars and not worry about stepping up to the diamond studded stuff. I agree with most of Harry's binocular comments, particularly including the fact that the range finder is a PITA to use and for most of us not really necessary. My binocs have a range finder, and I don't think I've used it 3 times. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Varis" wrote
I need binoculars for my little boat. Sounds like you need a bigger boat ... |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Jan 2007 06:54:00 -0800, "Varis" wrote:
The high price however makes me doubt whether this is a good investment at this point. There are some very good marine binoculars for around 200 bucks with similar specs (nitrogen filled etc). The Fujinon models have been praised: The right size for marine use is typically 7 x 50 because that gives the best night vision, and can still be held steadily enough on most boats. Steiner and Fujinon both make great binoculars but the Fujinon image stabilized models are reported to be in a class by themselves. I currently have a nice pair of Steiner 7 x 50s on my boat but my next pair will be the 12 x 50 stabilized Fujinons. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Krause wrote:
On 1/5/2007 10:09 AM, Varis wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Steiner makes waterproof binocs in 8x20, or maybe 8x30. Those might be used more successfully on a small boat. Wouldn't a heavy magnification (8x) however make the movement of the boat more pronounced than with the standard 7x - the field of view would appear to bob and heave more? (Following your advice one might go for say 6x18 binoculars from Helios, which are waterproof and dirt cheap...) Risto I dunno. I can't use my 7x50 Fujis on my 25' Parker. I can use a pair of 8x30 Steiner Navigators, though. There's too much motion usually for me to use the 7x50s. I use the binocs mainly to pick out channel marker buoy numbers and to see what the guys in boats nearby are reeling in when they fish. Where I boat, there's little need to do long-distance gazing. If you had a lobster boat, that would be different. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 5 Jan 2007 06:54:00 -0800, "Varis" wrote: Or alternatively I could go for compact generic travel binoculars at first (7x25 or 8x20 7x25 is all you need for a small boat - range finding binocs are useless. Stabilised binocs are fine, but they vary in technique from wet bag to gyro stabilised. The gyro binocs are the best. But for a small boat, go with the 7x25s. I have a pair of 7x35 Nikon's I purchased for less than $50 on sale from a boat store. They have never failed me for my recreational needs. Why folks seem to think they have to spend big bucks for these things is beyond me. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:44:56 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On 5 Jan 2007 16:46:33 -0800, "JimH" wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 5 Jan 2007 06:54:00 -0800, "Varis" wrote: Or alternatively I could go for compact generic travel binoculars at first (7x25 or 8x20 7x25 is all you need for a small boat - range finding binocs are useless. Stabilised binocs are fine, but they vary in technique from wet bag to gyro stabilised. The gyro binocs are the best. But for a small boat, go with the 7x25s. I have a pair of 7x35 Nikon's I purchased for less than $50 on sale from a boat store. They have never failed me for my recreational needs. Why folks seem to think they have to spend big bucks for these things is beyond me. There have been times where I could have used a set of gyro stabilized binoculars - hasn't been often though. If I had my druthers, I'd opt for a good set of light amplifying binoculars for night viewing. And, if you can easily afford the best, why settle for something well down the line. The Canon 10 x42 stabilized is a fine pair of binoculars! -- John |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:43:32 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: I'd prefer gyro to wet bag stabilization - personal preference. The IS Fujinons use piezo cyrstals to create an electronic gyro that drives minature servo operated prisms. Very fast and accurate, best technology available from what I've read. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On 5 Jan 2007 06:54:00 -0800, "Varis" wrote: Or alternatively I could go for compact generic travel binoculars at first (7x25 or 8x20 7x25 is all you need for a small boat - range finding binocs are useless. Stabilised binocs are fine, but they vary in technique from wet bag to gyro stabilised. The gyro binocs are the best. But for a small boat, go with the 7x25s. I have a pair of 7x35 Nikon's I purchased for less than $50 on sale from a boat store. They have never failed me for my recreational needs. Why folks seem to think they have to spend big bucks for these things is beyond me. as was was explained to me, in terms of "Boat Dollars" it is actually pretty cheap. here's a handy conversion chart: 1 "Boat Dollar" is the equivalent to $100 to a non-boater. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Good information on Marine Sealants... | General | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Marine Plywood or plywood for marine uses + links and images | Cruising | |||
FS: Marine Binoculars with Compass, Inflatable Harness, and 3 Great Books | ASA | |||
Good Marine Radio? | General |