basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

wrote in message
egroups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?

Yes.

In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.


Pot is racist?


Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.

Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.


What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice!

Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.


You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?

Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

wrote in message
egroups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?

Yes.

In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.


Pot is racist?


Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.

Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.


What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice!

Care to take the $5000 challenge? You seem so sure of yourself, so what
have you got to lose? Put up, or shut up?

Bert Robbins wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.


You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?

Irony doesn't work with you I see, because you're not bright enough to
get it.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.


You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?

Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your
definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want
YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it.

I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan,
would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free...


basskisser wrote:
Dan Krueger wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

wrote in message
egroups.com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

If you were a consumer of alcohol the day before Prohibition took
effect,
would you stop consuming it the next day, when it became illegal?

Yes.

In that case, you're exactly the kind of sheep that politicians thrive
on.
Pot is no worse for you than alcohol. Pot does a job on your lungs, and
MAYBE your brain. Booze does a job on your liver, stomach, esophagus, and
MAYBE your brain. Pot is illegal because of outmoded beliefs, many of
which
originated with racist nonsense left over from J. Edgar Hoover's earliest
days.


Pot is racist?


Its use was initially attacked early in the last century by the government
because Southern lawmakers thought its use by black people led to madness
and criminal behavior. Obviously, these lawmakers were happy to ignore all
the violence caused by drunkenness. The next myth used by the law
enforcement mob was that pot use led to harder drugs, an anecdote that's
been totally shredded by actual statistics.

Who's statistics, "High Times"?

You really are a pothead like Kevin.


What proof do you have that Kevin is a pothead, little one?


Referring to yourself in the third person. Nice!

Care to take the $5000 challenge? You seem so sure of yourself, so what
have you got to lose? Put up, or shut up?

wrote:
I would think that you'd finally accept the fact that Bert and Dan,
would jist as soon keep their money and call you Kevin for free...

That may be true. It's amazing at the amount of stuff that those two
post out of ignorance.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.

You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?

Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your
definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want
YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define it.

I am done.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.

You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?

Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is your
definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts. I want
YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can define
it.

I am done.


So, a pothead is someone who uses pot. Doesn't matter if they use it twice a
year. They're a pothead. You use alcohol, therefore you are an alcoholic.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Chuck Gould wrote:
Trying to troll "just a little" is like trying to be only slightly
pregnant.

Congrats to the usual players, as we are up to a gazillion posts and
the conversation is down to "You're a pothead" vs. "You're an
alcoholic"

A proud moment indeed for this group.

We need to stick to the topic, or darn close to the topic, when we
launch threads.

You are most welcome!

What's the next topic?
Oh....we're not done with this yet. I asked you a question. What is
your definition of a pothead, Bert? No links to anyone else's thoughts.
I want YOUR definition. If you use a word, it's safe to assume you can
define it.
I am done.


So, a pothead is someone who uses pot. Doesn't matter if they use it
twice a year. They're a pothead. You use alcohol, therefore you are an
alcoholic.

There's little doubt Bert is an alky.

Personal opinions aside, I'm just using his definition.