Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
On Sat, 27 May 2006 14:00:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "Jack Goff" wrote in message .. . Global warming alarmists are no different than religous fanatics. (and in reality, just another brand) You must believe in their particular brand or you are a heritic. Anything out of the ordinary that happens has roots in their beliefs. There is the constant proclamations of the "end of day" Those that express their disbelief are shouted down etc. etc. If it were found to be true (the connection between warming and human activity), how would you then decide which scientist hadn't been a fanatic? You may be missing the point. It's not that most people don't acknowledge some type of connection between warming and human activity. Rather, it's whether or not human activity plays a *significant* role in the equation, and if anything we might do could make any measurable difference whatsoever. Jack I'm not missing the point. If you acknowledge the connection, then logically, you must stop calling any scientist a political fanatic. I didn't call anyone a fanatic. That was someone else. However, whether or not there's a connection has little to do with a scientist being a political fanatic. Being correct on a single theory does not preclude one from being a fanatic. |
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
"Jack Goff" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 May 2006 14:00:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Jack Goff" wrote in message . .. Global warming alarmists are no different than religous fanatics. (and in reality, just another brand) You must believe in their particular brand or you are a heritic. Anything out of the ordinary that happens has roots in their beliefs. There is the constant proclamations of the "end of day" Those that express their disbelief are shouted down etc. etc. If it were found to be true (the connection between warming and human activity), how would you then decide which scientist hadn't been a fanatic? You may be missing the point. It's not that most people don't acknowledge some type of connection between warming and human activity. Rather, it's whether or not human activity plays a *significant* role in the equation, and if anything we might do could make any measurable difference whatsoever. Jack I'm not missing the point. If you acknowledge the connection, then logically, you must stop calling any scientist a political fanatic. I didn't call anyone a fanatic. That was someone else. However, whether or not there's a connection has little to do with a scientist being a political fanatic. Being correct on a single theory does not preclude one from being a fanatic. It is comical how the Global Warming Alarmists react. Anyone that doesn't believe in the creed is "in denial" or has been bought by the "evil corporate conspiracy" Have you noticed at almost every alarmist has socialist leanings, some even wish to eliminate humans from the earth, they also have short memories........forgetting the "coming ice age" doomsday predictions of the 70's. |
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
"P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "Jack Goff" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 May 2006 14:00:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Jack Goff" wrote in message . .. Global warming alarmists are no different than religous fanatics. (and in reality, just another brand) You must believe in their particular brand or you are a heritic. Anything out of the ordinary that happens has roots in their beliefs. There is the constant proclamations of the "end of day" Those that express their disbelief are shouted down etc. etc. If it were found to be true (the connection between warming and human activity), how would you then decide which scientist hadn't been a fanatic? You may be missing the point. It's not that most people don't acknowledge some type of connection between warming and human activity. Rather, it's whether or not human activity plays a *significant* role in the equation, and if anything we might do could make any measurable difference whatsoever. Jack I'm not missing the point. If you acknowledge the connection, then logically, you must stop calling any scientist a political fanatic. I didn't call anyone a fanatic. That was someone else. However, whether or not there's a connection has little to do with a scientist being a political fanatic. Being correct on a single theory does not preclude one from being a fanatic. It is comical how the Global Warming Alarmists react. Anyone that doesn't believe in the creed is "in denial" or has been bought by the "evil corporate conspiracy" Have you noticed at almost every alarmist has socialist leanings, some even wish to eliminate humans from the earth, they also have short memories........forgetting the "coming ice age" doomsday predictions of the 70's. You sound really smart. I want to learn from you. What is a socialist? |
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:51:33 -0400, P. Fritz wrote:
It is comical how the Global Warming Alarmists react. Anyone that doesn't believe in the creed is "in denial" or has been bought by the "evil corporate conspiracy" Have you noticed at almost every alarmist has socialist leanings, some even wish to eliminate humans from the earth, they also have short memories........forgetting the "coming ice age" doomsday predictions of the 70's. And the difference between a "Global Warming Alarmist" and you, would be? "socialist leanings", "eliminate humans", yup, I can see you are open to the possibility that this planet could be warming. Scientists, who have spent their entire careers studying this issue, have come down on both sides, but the general body of science believes the planet is warming. The only real debate is it natural, or man made. |
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:51:33 -0400, P. Fritz wrote: It is comical how the Global Warming Alarmists react. Anyone that doesn't believe in the creed is "in denial" or has been bought by the "evil corporate conspiracy" Have you noticed at almost every alarmist has socialist leanings, some even wish to eliminate humans from the earth, they also have short memories........forgetting the "coming ice age" doomsday predictions of the 70's. And the difference between a "Global Warming Alarmist" and you, would be? "socialist leanings", "eliminate humans", yup, I can see you are open to the possibility that this planet could be warming. Scientists, who have spent their entire careers studying this issue, have come down on both sides, but the general body of science believes the planet is warming. The only real debate is it natural, or man made. I'll bet you $11.39 that I can make this Fritz unit go off on a tangent that 100% predictable. Say when. |
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
One for the not so swift among us-
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 27 May 2006 12:51:33 -0400, P. Fritz wrote: It is comical how the Global Warming Alarmists react. Anyone that doesn't believe in the creed is "in denial" or has been bought by the "evil corporate conspiracy" Have you noticed at almost every alarmist has socialist leanings, some even wish to eliminate humans from the earth, they also have short memories........forgetting the "coming ice age" doomsday predictions of the 70's. And the difference between a "Global Warming Alarmist" and you, would be? "socialist leanings", "eliminate humans", yup, I can see you are open to the possibility that this planet could be warming. Scientists, who have spent their entire careers studying this issue, have come down on both sides, but the general body of science believes the planet is warming. The only real debate is it natural, or man made. I'll bet you $11.39 that I can make this Fritz unit go off on a tangent that 100% predictable. Say when. Oh, I wouldn't touch that bet, we all know Fritz!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Announcing S.A.L.T.S Pacific Swift Offshore Voyage 2007-2008 | General | |||
Announcing S.A.L.T.S Pacific Swift Offshore Voyage 2007-2008 | ASA | |||
Announcing S.A.L.T.S Pacific Swift Offshore Voyage 2007-2008 | Cruising | |||
Announcing S.A.L.T.S Pacific Swift Offshore Voyage 2007-2008 | Cruising | |||
Swift Kipawa for Sale: Ontario Canada | General |