On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:51:53 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said "What
would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email". I never
made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.


" JimH" wrote in message
...
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer after
he took you up on it.



You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.

Harry, quote the posts. Smithers allows his posts to be archived, I believe.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:50:35 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:


You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?


Harry, show us where Smithers said he would answer the questions you asked. That's a simple request.
The post you quote says nothing about giving you answers. It simply asks you for information, i.e.,
what do you want to know.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:51:23 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JimH wrote:
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after
he took you up on it.



That's because he's a coward, as I have been suggesting.

No, Jim was mistaken. Smithers did not say he would post whatever
information you requested. He said
to ask him anything you desired.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!



Oh my.

Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said
"What would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email". I
never made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.


" JimH" wrote in message
...
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after he took you up on it.



You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.






--
Abstinence-only sex education=Ignorance-only sex education.

Harry,
I didn't volunteer to answer any of your questions. I asked you "what do
you want to know"? You of all people should be able to understand that my
question does not constitute an offer to answer any and all personal
questions you ask? I thought you were a college graduate who could process
info.

I think you might be obsessed.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Me, I have nothing but compassion for the wives of the righties here.
Imagine what a strong woman you'd have to be to be married to a piece of
crap like Skipper.

And forget not, Fritz's wife divorced him. She probably figured she
could better deal him. She might even be a hottie.


Harry,
Is it possible this is why you wanted all that personal information from
me?




You're a lying coward, Smithers.

In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.













--


--
War is not pro-life.

Harry,
What would you like to know?

grin


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Paul,
It is obvious.


You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.



--
Habeas corpus: Legal term no longer in use.

Harry,
Can you show me one post where I volunteered to give you any information?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said
"What would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email". I
never made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.


" JimH" wrote in message
...
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after he took you up on it.



You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.






--
Abstinence-only sex education=Ignorance-only sex education.

Harry,
What do you want to know?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.





You're welcome to come by my house, break in and try to do something about
it, Bert.
BTW, I'm not whining about Smithers not playing fair. I never expected him
to honor his word.
I'm merely pointing that he's a lying, cowardly weasel.







--
DeLay, Tom: Past tense of De Lie.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.





You're welcome to come by my house, break in and try to do something about
it, Bert.
BTW, I'm not whining about Smithers not playing fair. I never expected him
to honor his word.
I'm merely pointing that he's a lying, cowardly weasel.

Ok, provide me with your address and I'll come over tonight!

Harry,

Publish a verifiable picture of your Lobster Boat, and I will answer all
questions you posted previously.

Since you are a slow learning, this is an actual counter offer verses a
question inquiring what information you request to know.

I hope everyone realizes how dangerous it is to give a lunatic any personal
information. The only reason I would make a counter offer, is I know there
is no Lobster Boat.

..


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry,
I didn't volunteer to answer any of your questions.

Smithers is a cowardly, lying, weaseling assho*le, *exactly* as I have
been stating here for a long, long time, and his latest rationalization
isn't working, except, perhaps, on his fellow weasels.






--
Remove Bush's Feeding Tube!