Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:17:33 +0000, Bill McKee wrote: He very much could have had a bomb. Just not able to fire it off. Same as the guy trying to light the fuse on the shoe bomb. Nuts or not, if you make a statement that you have a bomb, while on an airplane or public area with lots of people, I would not fault anybody from shooting the guy in the head, and killing him very quickly. That includes those with Concealed Carry permits. Just make sure there are witnesses to the bomb statement. Those same witnesses would be testifying against you in court. Air Marshals operate to different guidelines, and from the little we know of the circumstances, this shooting was probably justified. However, under the guidelines of most jurisdictions, this man's behavior doesn't fit a policeman's guidelines for deadly force, but the guidelines are in debate as we speak. However, as a civilian, you had better pray for a sympathetic jury, because you would be facing one. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...080301867.html Different guidelines than a cop. But with the amount of suicide bombers in the world, and after 9/11 and the guy with the shoe bomb, would be very hard to get all 12 jurors to say you are guilty. If you come up with a couple of creditable witnesses, even a mediocre lawyer could get you off. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eyewitness: "I Never Heard the Word 'Bomb'" | General |