On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 21:14:53 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 13:23:56 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

thunder wrote:
On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 08:47:48 -0500, *JimH* wrote:


Sure he did. His actions indicated he was intent on killing hundreds.

No, Jim, his actions were *misinterpreted* as indicating he was intent
on
killing hundreds. If that was his intention, he would have needed a way
to accomplish it. He didn't, no bomb, no weapons.

Again, the Air Marshals may have been justified in the use of deadly
force, but this man did not "deserve" to be killed.


If I were a prosecutor or defense lawyer, Hertvik would be the first
prospective juror I would want removed from the panel.

I would think you'd try to have anyone with an IQ above 80 removed.

As the saying goes...
"Do you really want your fate determined by 12 people who were too stupid to
get out of jury duty?"


HEY!! I showed up when I was called! I didn't get selected, but at least I went. Maybe I just looked
too smart.

--
John H

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.